I humbly submit a new word and send it forth into the blogosphere: “blargument.” Definition? An argument on a blog, especially of the substantive type rather than mere name-calling. Does an argument sparked by trolling qualify? Yes.
Update: as Emily Litella would say, “Never mind.”
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, December 15th, 2004 at 12:06 am and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Previously a lifelong Democrat, born in New York and living in New England, surrounded by liberals on all sides, I've found myself slowly but surely 
March 3rd, 2007 at 12:00 am
Armchair Capitalists: July 2005
I wrote a while back about a blargument (Did I just coin a new phrase? Sadly,
Google says no.) between Brad DeLong and Will Wilkinson. …
Heh, google says no.
March 3rd, 2007 at 12:00 am
Very nice! I’ll pass it along, with acknowlegement of course.
But if I were you, I’d ditch the troll. They get off on themselves without a hat-tip from someone else. Blargument would be useful for something that’s more intense than comments or discussion, but is by people who actually want to be engaged, not just get up other folks’ noses.
(Just an ol’ fashion Truman Democrat)
HTTP://CHEZNADEZHDA.BLOGHARBOR.COM>chez Nadezhda and Liberals Against Terrorism
March 3rd, 2007 at 12:00 am
Yo, you should link to our blargument as an example.