<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It must be true&#8211;after all, it&#8217;s in the FBI report</title>
	<link>http://neoneocon.com/2005/05/26/it-must-be-true-after-all-its-in-fbi/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2005/05/26/it-must-be-true-after-all-its-in-fbi/#comment-1149</link>
		<author>chuck</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://neoneocon.com/2005/05/26/it-must-be-true-after-all-its-in-fbi/#comment-1149</guid>
					<description>These days "where there is smoke there is a journalist."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days &#8220;where there is smoke there is a journalist.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neo-neocon</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2005/05/26/it-must-be-true-after-all-its-in-fbi/#comment-1150</link>
		<author>neo-neocon</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://neoneocon.com/2005/05/26/it-must-be-true-after-all-its-in-fbi/#comment-1150</guid>
					<description>Bryan J. Weitzel:  I'm with you on that.  I wrote an entire post on the subject, entitled, "The alleged accused suspected suspect is in custody."  It's &lt;A HREF="http://neo-neocon.blogspot.com/2005/03/alleged-accused-suspected-suspect-is.html" REL="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan J. Weitzel:  I&#8217;m with you on that.  I wrote an entire post on the subject, entitled, &#8220;The alleged accused suspected suspect is in custody.&#8221;  It&#8217;s <a HREF="http://neo-neocon.blogspot.com/2005/03/alleged-accused-suspected-suspect-is.html" REL="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meander</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2005/05/26/it-must-be-true-after-all-its-in-fbi/#comment-1151</link>
		<author>meander</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://neoneocon.com/2005/05/26/it-must-be-true-after-all-its-in-fbi/#comment-1151</guid>
					<description>Definitely #2 "not so subtle" and yet, and yet, do they even know they are doing this? Sometimes I get furious at this nonsense and other times, I just shake my head in disgust. However, since we have soldiers overseas in the midst of a volatile muslim population, I think furious is a justifiable response. What on earth is going to change the overall tone of the MSM?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely #2 &#8220;not so subtle&#8221; and yet, and yet, do they even know they are doing this? Sometimes I get furious at this nonsense and other times, I just shake my head in disgust. However, since we have soldiers overseas in the midst of a volatile muslim population, I think furious is a justifiable response. What on earth is going to change the overall tone of the MSM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan J Weitzel</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2005/05/26/it-must-be-true-after-all-its-in-fbi/#comment-1152</link>
		<author>Bryan J Weitzel</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://neoneocon.com/2005/05/26/it-must-be-true-after-all-its-in-fbi/#comment-1152</guid>
					<description>There are two trends in the MSM that I find disturbing:&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;1) The use of annonymous sources that you have previouly pointed out.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;2) The use of the word "allegedly".&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Two recent headlines are prime examples of the misuse of this word.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;WOMAN ALLEGEDLY LEAVES BABY IN CAR WHILE PARTYING&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;The problem with this headline was that the baby was found in the car and the woman was found in the bar partying.  Where is the "allegedly"?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;HUSBAND BOUGHT FINGER ALLEGEDLY FOUND IN CHILI&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;The problem here is that the finger was not found in the chili.  If anything should be "allegedly" it is that the husband "allegedly" bought it.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Especially when dealing with criminals who are caught red-handed, I wish the MSM would just say the facts.  Hinkley didn't allegedly shoot Reagan.  It was on national TV.  He did it.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;This is from an article in the Washington Post (not a headline): "Nichols, who was on trial for rape and on the run from allegedly killing a judge, two law enforcement officers and a court reporter, shoved Smith into her own apartment in suburban Atlanta at 2 a.m., tied her up and held her at gunpoint."&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;He didn't allegedly kill a judge and two law enforcement officers.  He DID kill a judge and two law enforcement officers.  Witnesses were there and some of his actions are even on film.  What's "allegedly" about it?  It hasn't been proven in a court of law perhaps, but he still did it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two trends in the MSM that I find disturbing:</p>
<p>1) The use of annonymous sources that you have previouly pointed out.</p>
<p>2) The use of the word &#8220;allegedly&#8221;.</p>
<p>Two recent headlines are prime examples of the misuse of this word.</p>
<p>WOMAN ALLEGEDLY LEAVES BABY IN CAR WHILE PARTYING</p>
<p>The problem with this headline was that the baby was found in the car and the woman was found in the bar partying.  Where is the &#8220;allegedly&#8221;?</p>
<p>HUSBAND BOUGHT FINGER ALLEGEDLY FOUND IN CHILI</p>
<p>The problem here is that the finger was not found in the chili.  If anything should be &#8220;allegedly&#8221; it is that the husband &#8220;allegedly&#8221; bought it.</p>
<p>Especially when dealing with criminals who are caught red-handed, I wish the MSM would just say the facts.  Hinkley didn&#8217;t allegedly shoot Reagan.  It was on national TV.  He did it.</p>
<p>This is from an article in the Washington Post (not a headline): &#8220;Nichols, who was on trial for rape and on the run from allegedly killing a judge, two law enforcement officers and a court reporter, shoved Smith into her own apartment in suburban Atlanta at 2 a.m., tied her up and held her at gunpoint.&#8221;</p>
<p>He didn&#8217;t allegedly kill a judge and two law enforcement officers.  He DID kill a judge and two law enforcement officers.  Witnesses were there and some of his actions are even on film.  What&#8217;s &#8220;allegedly&#8221; about it?  It hasn&#8217;t been proven in a court of law perhaps, but he still did it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Zacek</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2005/05/26/it-must-be-true-after-all-its-in-fbi/#comment-1153</link>
		<author>Ray Zacek</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://neoneocon.com/2005/05/26/it-must-be-true-after-all-its-in-fbi/#comment-1153</guid>
					<description>Don't let this get around, but that is what is in the confidental FBI background check on judicial nominee Henry Saad: he flushed a Koran down the toilet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t let this get around, but that is what is in the confidental FBI background check on judicial nominee Henry Saad: he flushed a Koran down the toilet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
