It’s called freedom.

This is not a war of honor and duty, but one in which we match our ruthlessness to theirs.

Cruel people always assume that other kinder, more merciful people, lack their ruthlessness.

It is justice incarnate to prove them utterly wrong, and to be proud in the proof.

A war of mercy, simply gets more people killed, which is fine if the United States cares to lose their best and brightest over the decades.

Maybe you could use these statements next time, they are not political rebukes. Rather, they are rapier witticisms meant to slip beneath an opponent’s guard and gut him without him ever knowing his ignominous defeat.

Bush is evil, why else would he make it harder for our Special Forces to fight terrorism by spreading tales of cowardice about how burning dead Taliban bodies to psychologically upset the terroists, is somehow “not representative of America”.

Only a pack knows another pack of people howling for vengeance, as America knows the fury of the Kurds and the Shia. Therefore we supply them with weapons of murder, mayhem, and terror, though we are polite enough to leave most of the killing to them, even though we are slavering at the mouth to kill some ourselves. Especially those Southern crackers that killed Vincent, a free lance journalist.

Ya, I wish we could have sent the National Guardsmen that embarassed America to a death camp. Not a fitting reward for people who have exposed the truth, but order must be kept.

They just turn into Jekyl-Hyde dimwits when politics rears its ugly head.

That is probably cause they are nearing maximum entropy. Any strictly ordered system becomes chaotic in the end through decay, and any fully chaotic system has an order to it. They have just reached so high up in “international Law” order, that they are approaching maximum entropy, the state of absolute and ignoramus like collapse.

Their balance is lost. Only through ironies, can they ever understand the joke of their circumstance.

To lose one’s balance in chaos and order, is to not know water from sewage.

Quite sad. On your part, quite frustrating perhaps as well.

We do (or at least read their blogs and the things they say to reporters), that’s why we supported the removal of Saddam, and the reconstruction of Iraq. Since they have enough hope for their country to buy real estate and durable goods and volunteer in droves for their new military and police force, we have hope too.

How many Iraqis spoke at any of the huge world-wide antiwar rallies of the past 3 years? The antiwar movement has repeatedly shown it only cares about Iraqis when it can position them as victims of the US.

I would like to respond that I voted Republican, and that I’ve been growing even more conservative lately, and find these messages somewhat offensive. I could consult The Gentle Art of Verbal Self-Defense (1980, Suzette Haden Elgin), and look up an appropriate response to the empowering “Everyone knows” claim. I’m more inclined to send back a snappy comeback, and go about my business:

“You better watch it with your Bush-Bashing, you terrorist sympathasizing Dhimmi-crat, or I’ll have my good friend and co-conspirator, President George W. Bush sic his Roveian Hurricane Machine on you! And George Bush Hates Black People!”

My gay uncle Jerry is White, but if I wanted to be mean, I would substitute Kayne West’s use of “black people” with “gay people” (not that there’s anything wrong with that.) I’m not certain that would help salvage the relationship with this relative, while stemming the influx of unwanted liberal commentary. So, with reluctance, I opened the Verbal Self-Defense book to chapter 8, “Everyone Understands Why You…” This is more of a personal attack than the bandwagon fallacy of “everyone agrees with me.” The best advice I can come up with is something like… respond in Computer Mode and nominalize the presupposition, which produces a response like this:

“Yes, the shame and embarassment of the 51% of us who voted for Bush (or who support the war on terror) certainly is astounding, isn’t it?”

A snarky response like that might get through to the smarter ones. Anymore, I don’t care to spend the energy to construct such a response, and remember to use it the next time that particular attack comes up. But a decisive response is necessary, otherwise they assume that silence is acquiescence. So, I think I’d be better off sending back the first response.

peace

82% Of Iraqis Oppose Foreign Troops
A new poll commissioned by the British military has found that 82 percent of Iraqis strongly oppose the continued presence of foreign troops. Less than 1 percent of the population feels foreign troops have helped improve security in Iraq. The poll also found 45 percent of Iraqis feel attacks against US troops are justified.

Poll finds support for attacks on coalition forces

Liberalism eventually leads useful idiots down The Road to Serfdom, this is why they are slaves to their cause. To recognize otherwise would admit they were used as idiots. A purple finger scares them.

Today, for example, I am laughing loudly at the anti-liberators because the people of Brazil rejected the gun-ban proposed by their own useful idiots of artists, governmental oppressors and peace for genocide people.

Around the world the common person is not as stupid as the useful idiots would lead us to believe. Power to the people, down with Serfdom!

That said, the useful idiots are bringing out the death under an Ice Age arguement, only unlike in the 1970′s, they they say are now going to declared we will all die now from a climate change of an Ice Age caused by Global Warming.

Useful idiotism make for great comedy.

I laugh.