Home » An apology? Not good enough!

Comments

An apology? Not good enough! — 21 Comments

  1. I have been following a site now for almost 2 years and I have found it to be both reliable and profitable. They post daily and their stock trades have been beating
    the indexes easily.

    Take a look at Wallstreetwinnersonline.com

    RickJ

  2. Yeah, Bush is a sweetie, all right. Good thing he’s a uniter, not a divider.

    tequilamockingbird

  3. As you can see, if Bush wasn’t as sweet as I portray him as, he would be a lot better at countering propaganda like Tequila’s.

    But Bush can’t even get out the gate in this respect.

    And that’s a bad thing for the War on Terror, it means more people will die and the war will be longer. Maybe as long as Vietnam, with a final victory at the end of the decade.

    It is a good thing that the basic strategy doesn’t require Bush to do much… but that’s a secret, don’t tell the Democrats that.

  4. I’ve read several suggestions lately from both sides of the divide as to how Bush can re-energize his second term the way Ronald Reagan did. Perhaps one thing that would help would be a statement something like “I’ve been telling the American people that no one in my administration was involved in illegally disclosing the identity of a CIA operative. My heart and my best intentions still tell me that’s true, but the facts and the evidence tell me it is not.”

    tequilamockingbird

  5. I suppose they could always use one of Saddam’s iron maidens.

    Maybe that would suffice.

  6. Ymarsakar: I’m not so sure Bush is as sweet as you fear, and, in any case, the cabal came in to the office as usual this morning so I think we’re in pretty good hands vis a vis the war.

    As for Reid, he and Dodd are really out of control. Since Fitzgerald didn’t give them what they wanted in the investigation, they go on the Sunday talk shows and demand the Republicans just hand them Cheney and Rove. It’s pathetic.

  7. So, the Democrat Party is doing all it can to cover Joe Wilson’s rotting lies? Covering Berger’s National Security theft? Defending Sowcrofts insane poicy of ‘stability’? What’s next an appology for not hiding our pigs, our women, our Christians/Jews/Hindus/Atheists?

    I will NEVER forget the Democrat Party’s treason.

  8. At this very moment, only a few people like myself clearly see the obvious absurdity of a trial. The consensus view will soon be that a prosecutor will not be able to convict Scooter Libby. No jury will unanimously find him guilty. I suspect that all this nonsense should cease in a few weeks. Does anyone disagree? If so, please explain why.

  9. This is just an attempt to turn “Fitzmas” into a Boxing Day donation bonanza. This was supposed to be Watergate, where the Evil Insiders get caught, the glorious left brings down a President and ends a war.

    Instead, “Fitzmas” turned out to be a bad Halloween party: the dreaded conviction is a Big Nothing, and it could backfire as it’s dragging Joe Wilson’s lies back into the MSM.

  10. Scooter Libby will probably not even have his day in court. The prosecutor’s case is extremely weak. It borders on complete lunacy. Libby is rumored to have earned millions of dollars before entering the White House. He is not a moron. Libby knew that no law was initially broken. He had no reason to lie. We can therefore logically conclude that his memory is playing tricks on him. No group of twelve jurors will ever unanimously vote to convict.

  11. The planted axiom behind such calls for apologies, or, during the election for any example of a mistake, is that the other side won’t use it to beat your head in.

    Dealing with democrats, it’s not a good idea to presume good faith.

  12. Remember the old adage, ” Absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Will Rogers said that we have the best politicians that money can buy and he had a point. GWB is so insulted (plausible deniabilty priciple in effect here ) that one wonders if he knows what is really going on. And I voted for him !

  13. It could be worse ymarsaker. The troops could have specifically request armor, (in the form of M1A1 Abrams tanks, something that had existed in large numbers), and have that request turned down as had done by Clintons Sec. Def. While we were in Somalia.

    I dont recall the outrage then.

  14. A lot more people would love Bush if he only told a couple of lies, (propaganda) that man is too honest and not fond of the quick reparte.

    I don’t even approve of his job conduct anymore, and that’s saying something.

    Roosevelt was not a very nice man, but one thing you could not call him was a bad or weak leader.

    Bush is a very nice man, but most of America don’t really want a nice man in charge of the War on Terror, they want a killer, some dude with coldly calculating eyes bent on vengeance, mayhem, death and destruction.

    In times of savagery, lies and distortions, propaganda and death, I would feel very safe to have people who are masters in deception, death, and manipulation on my side.

    Oh well, fight a war with the army you got, not the one you would wish for.

  15. Apology, eh? I think not.

    And now for something entirely different –

    “The Reverse of The Medal” by Patrick O’Brian contains a tremendous pillory scene. Good stuff. Great stuff, actually.

  16. Well said. I had something about a pound of flesh and Sandy Berger, but it wasn’t very appetizing.

  17. I got an apology for them.

    Bush should say on national tv,

    “I am sorry that the leaking of national documents pertaining to the security of the United States have gotten so bad even the Democrats are worrying about it”

    I promise to do my best to bring the situation back to a more acceptable venue, where the leaks only harmed American prestige, my Administration, and mundane matters concerning troop casualties, lack of armor, and low morale.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>