To find out more, visit my work at home online business internet business site. It successfully covers FREE information exposing FREE traffic and work at home online business internet business related stuff. Don’t forget – FREE, FREE, FREE. You have nothing to lose!

And the conservatives did win seats in the GTA. 905 is very much a part of the GTA. They just didn’t win any seats in the city of Toronto.

For some reason that sounds really familiar to me.

When a democratic party only represents the rich, then I’m pretty sure they are no longer a representative of democracy anymore.

The nanny state will probably be decentralized. The Conservatives favour stripping the federal government of many of the responsibilities it has assumed over the years, like health care or more recently day care. The BQ are largely in agreement on this and together the two parties can get something done on this issue. See pedro’s comment about the devolution of power.

Also the proposed Federal Accountability Act is acceptable to the BQ and possibly the NDP but its passage will seriously hurt the Liberals because it will outlaw donations from corporations and unions and also limit personal donations. The Liberals rely on a small number of large donors, while the other parties fund themselves mainly through many small individual donors. They are currently heavily in debt

“I occasionally think how quickly our differences, worldwide, would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world.”
— Ronald Reagan, 1988.

NOTE: I feel this story is overplayed by too many.

Is it luck, national destiny, the will of a mercurial God, that the US has such a perfect balance of powers?

If the Founding fathers had ditched the Electoral System, and favored Majority Votes only and all that it entailed (think Socrates), where would the United States be right now…

There was a very good reason to balance large states vs small states. As Americans should have studied in their Civics classes. That debate created a balance of powers, where small states could not be leeched of resources and power by bigger and more populous states. The defense of the weak, as well as the rule of the strong.

Even 2 centuries afterwards, we see the very real effects of the Founding Fathers.

Which is why george soros, Michael Moore, Syndey Sheehan, and all others of their ilk show such dishonor in not repaying a cent in blood or vigilance, to repay the debt the Founders of this nation paid in full.

What worth is a man or a woman that does not pay their debts? And how does Canada ever go off the path of British doom.

In some ways, America has benefited from the Athenians, the Spartans, the Romans, and the British common law. Including all the immigrant cultures, from East to West, from Ireland to Africa and India.

Yet, the synthesis is very weird. Britain itself was overrun by Saxons after the Roman Empire left them to fend for themselves. So Britain held their heritage as much to Rome as we do, yet… their synthesis didn’t come out right.

Somehow after WWII, the British convinced themselves that national unity and national character could be produce by the government what a fatal mistake. And Canada, probably suffered from this cultural miasma infusion until independence.

I think if Canada were forced into defending themselves, alone, against an invasion, I think things might change. But that’s not likely.

There will certainly be a more tactful diplomatic relationship:

A tribute to America’s Ambassador to Canada [comedy skit]

Excellent beer.

When you get down to it beer and hockey are all that matter anyway, so we pretty much rule your ass.