Comments on: From insurgency to civil war http://neoneocon.com/2006/03/20/from-insurgency-to-civil-war/ Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:02:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1 By: Bezuhov http://neoneocon.com/2006/03/20/from-insurgency-to-civil-war/#comment-11705 Bezuhov Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2006/03/20/from-insurgency-to-civil-war/#comment-11705 "he Left is saying we have lost. Some conservatives are saying we have lost. The right is saying we are winning. Some conservatives are saying we are winning."<BR/><BR/>This isn't a fricking pennant race.<BR/><BR/>Lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way already. “he Left is saying we have lost. Some conservatives are saying we have lost. The right is saying we are winning. Some conservatives are saying we are winning.”

This isn’t a fricking pennant race.

Lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way already.

]]> By: douglas http://neoneocon.com/2006/03/20/from-insurgency-to-civil-war/#comment-11706 douglas Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2006/03/20/from-insurgency-to-civil-war/#comment-11706 Steve, ever pessimistic and helpless... Thank God there are those who DO feel they can do something. Steve, ever pessimistic and helpless… Thank God there are those who DO feel they can do something.

]]> By: Ymarsakar http://neoneocon.com/2006/03/20/from-insurgency-to-civil-war/#comment-11707 Ymarsakar Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2006/03/20/from-insurgency-to-civil-war/#comment-11707 http://www.blogger.com/%20%20http://fallbackbelmont.blogspot.com/2006/03/reason-to-believe.html<BR/><BR/>Found that in my Clip cache.<BR/><BR/>That was the actual link I saw. http://www.blogger.com/%20%20http://fallbackbelmont.blogspot.com/2006/03/reason-to-believe.html

Found that in my Clip cache.

That was the actual link I saw.

]]> By: Ymarsakar http://neoneocon.com/2006/03/20/from-insurgency-to-civil-war/#comment-11708 Ymarsakar Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2006/03/20/from-insurgency-to-civil-war/#comment-11708 From what I saw, there was something in front of the link. All I did was copy and paste it, then delete the www.blogger. &%$*( part in front.<BR/><BR/>Now it works. From what I saw, there was something in front of the link. All I did was copy and paste it, then delete the www.blogger. &%$*( part in front.

Now it works.

]]> By: neo-neocon http://neoneocon.com/2006/03/20/from-insurgency-to-civil-war/#comment-11709 neo-neocon Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2006/03/20/from-insurgency-to-civil-war/#comment-11709 I tried to fix the link, and it looks fine to me, but it still won't take me there! I'll try one more time, <A HREF="http://fallbackbelmont.blogspot.com/2006/03/reason-to-believe.html" REL="nofollow">here</A>. I tried to fix the link, and it looks fine to me, but it still won’t take me there! I’ll try one more time, here.

]]> By: Ymarsakar http://neoneocon.com/2006/03/20/from-insurgency-to-civil-war/#comment-11710 Ymarsakar Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2006/03/20/from-insurgency-to-civil-war/#comment-11710 Your link is broken Neo.<BR/><BR/>Perhaps you might help from using Mozzila's "save link text" and CoodClip.<BR/><BR/>I use CoodClip and it is very very useful. I suggest it highly.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.freedownloadscenter.com/Utilities/Clipboard_Management_Tools/CoodClip.html" REL="nofollow">Link</A><BR/><BR/>When you're going to be copying and pasting as much as you do while blogging, a clipboard program is an absolute necessity. Your link is broken Neo.

Perhaps you might help from using Mozzila’s “save link text” and CoodClip.

I use CoodClip and it is very very useful. I suggest it highly.

Link

When you’re going to be copying and pasting as much as you do while blogging, a clipboard program is an absolute necessity.

]]> By: Steve http://neoneocon.com/2006/03/20/from-insurgency-to-civil-war/#comment-11711 Steve Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2006/03/20/from-insurgency-to-civil-war/#comment-11711 I have made it clear in prior posts that I don't know if Iraq is having a civil war or will have a civil war; I don't even know when our mission will be accomplished.<BR/><BR/>Having said that, I think what's going on now is a very transparent rhetorical struggle to get control of the truth-football. The Left is saying we have lost. Some conservatives are saying we have lost. The right is saying we are winning. Some conservatives are saying we are winning. The key term is, "civil war" which translates as "longterm internecine warfare that the US cannot control, so, we lost, let's get out." That is why whether or not we designate "civil war" is important.<BR/><BR/>I think as a debate it's casuistry. Either things will calm down, or they won't. Not much we can do about it now. I have made it clear in prior posts that I don’t know if Iraq is having a civil war or will have a civil war; I don’t even know when our mission will be accomplished.

Having said that, I think what’s going on now is a very transparent rhetorical struggle to get control of the truth-football. The Left is saying we have lost. Some conservatives are saying we have lost. The right is saying we are winning. Some conservatives are saying we are winning. The key term is, “civil war” which translates as “longterm internecine warfare that the US cannot control, so, we lost, let’s get out.” That is why whether or not we designate “civil war” is important.

I think as a debate it’s casuistry. Either things will calm down, or they won’t. Not much we can do about it now.

]]>