This is quite unofficial, but I got an email about the verdict in the Lurçat trial. It was in French, so I used Babelfish to decipher it; therefore the following information is extremely preliminary and rather suspect. However, from what I could discern, it appears he may have gotten off on a technicality that doesn’t go to any of the important issues in the trial.
When I wrote this piece about the trial, I mentioned, “one of [Lurçat's] defenses appeared to be that he hadn’t actually written the words in question on his website; someone else had.”
And that appears to be the point on which he may have been successful. More later, as I learn it.