<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 56-41 and fight: the Senate&#8217;s latest vote on Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38318</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38318</guid>
		<description>&quot;Every American likes a cheap war for funs and giggles. Maybe not every American, but certainly every American Leftist.&quot;

So Noam Chomsky ordered Grenada.

&quot;Only when the slaves started getting uppity and disagreeing with the cheap war loving Left, did he start losing support.&quot;

Usually conservatives are good writers. Why are the ones here so inept?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Every American likes a cheap war for funs and giggles. Maybe not every American, but certainly every American Leftist.&#8221;</p>
<p>So Noam Chomsky ordered Grenada.</p>
<p>&#8220;Only when the slaves started getting uppity and disagreeing with the cheap war loving Left, did he start losing support.&#8221;</p>
<p>Usually conservatives are good writers. Why are the ones here so inept?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wanderer</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38301</link>
		<dc:creator>wanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38301</guid>
		<description>Of course the same WSJ was editorially supporting the Taliban during the Clinton years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the same WSJ was editorially supporting the Taliban during the Clinton years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38163</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38163</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;90% of Americans, including me were on the Bush’s side regarding Afghanistan.&lt;/b&gt;

Every American likes a cheap war for funs and giggles. Maybe not every American, but certainly every American Leftist.

&lt;b&gt;only then he started to lose the support of American people.&lt;/b&gt;

Only when the slaves started getting uppity and disagreeing with the cheap war loving Left, did he start losing support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>90% of Americans, including me were on the Bush’s side regarding Afghanistan.</b></p>
<p>Every American likes a cheap war for funs and giggles. Maybe not every American, but certainly every American Leftist.</p>
<p><b>only then he started to lose the support of American people.</b></p>
<p>Only when the slaves started getting uppity and disagreeing with the cheap war loving Left, did he start losing support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stumbley</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38116</link>
		<dc:creator>stumbley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 04:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38116</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;for fear to be exposed as a duped brainwashed fraud, the member of the GOP fan club, no matter how bad or well they play in the tournament.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Dang! I forgot to launder my brown shirt today...guess I&#039;ll have to wear the sheet tonight...

I cower before the onslaught of such withering humiliation! I&#039;ll never be able to comment again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;for fear to be exposed as a duped brainwashed fraud, the member of the GOP fan club, no matter how bad or well they play in the tournament.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Dang! I forgot to launder my brown shirt today&#8230;guess I&#8217;ll have to wear the sheet tonight&#8230;</p>
<p>I cower before the onslaught of such withering humiliation! I&#8217;ll never be able to comment again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sashal</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38093</link>
		<dc:creator>sashal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 02:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38093</guid>
		<description>Ymarsakar, do you know what is the interesting point you inadvertently brought into  our discussion?( thanks for the link, btw)
90% of Americans, including me were on the Bush&#039;s side regarding Afghanistan. Only when he started uncalled for and unnecessary invasion of Iraq ,  only then  he started to lose the support of American people.
some could see it right away how stupid and hurting our cause against AQ that Iraq war was(including me), for some it took a little longer.

Where are you?
Still on the brainwashed deluded side?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ymarsakar, do you know what is the interesting point you inadvertently brought into  our discussion?( thanks for the link, btw)<br />
90% of Americans, including me were on the Bush&#8217;s side regarding Afghanistan. Only when he started uncalled for and unnecessary invasion of Iraq ,  only then  he started to lose the support of American people.<br />
some could see it right away how stupid and hurting our cause against AQ that Iraq war was(including me), for some it took a little longer.</p>
<p>Where are you?<br />
Still on the brainwashed deluded side?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sashal</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38090</link>
		<dc:creator>sashal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 02:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38090</guid>
		<description>very disappointing , Sally.
Now you can of course keep conflating Bin Laden and Saddam, after all your bettors do it all the time, but that shtick only works for a few delusioned  ones, that&#039;s all.
So you  were not able to justify the attack on Iraq .
That&#039;s what I thought. If I were  you, I would acknowledge the  defeat and inability to refute even one of kadet&#039;s points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very disappointing , Sally.<br />
Now you can of course keep conflating Bin Laden and Saddam, after all your bettors do it all the time, but that shtick only works for a few delusioned  ones, that&#8217;s all.<br />
So you  were not able to justify the attack on Iraq .<br />
That&#8217;s what I thought. If I were  you, I would acknowledge the  defeat and inability to refute even one of kadet&#8217;s points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38087</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38087</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;8. He constantly tries to separate Congress from the people, when in his job, Congress IS the people&lt;/b&gt;

Right. That&#039;s what the South said concerning State&#039;s Rights to use slaves as parts of a man concerning population votes and representation. The &quot;states&quot; are the people, obviously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>8. He constantly tries to separate Congress from the people, when in his job, Congress IS the people</b></p>
<p>Right. That&#8217;s what the South said concerning State&#8217;s Rights to use slaves as parts of a man concerning population votes and representation. The &#8220;states&#8221; are the people, obviously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38086</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38086</guid>
		<description>matt-sanchez.com&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.matt-sanchez.com/2007/07/marines-mentor-.html#more&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;There are plenty of liberators that have spoken well for the cause of the United States&lt;/a&gt;

But none of that matters if one will not believe.

One thing that will make people believe is if Bush uses MIRV nukes via authorization to his submarine force, and also starts executing folks in the United States on demand.

That&#039;ll convince almost anybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>matt-sanchez.com<a href="http://www.matt-sanchez.com/2007/07/marines-mentor-.html#more" rel="nofollow">There are plenty of liberators that have spoken well for the cause of the United States</a></p>
<p>But none of that matters if one will not believe.</p>
<p>One thing that will make people believe is if Bush uses MIRV nukes via authorization to his submarine force, and also starts executing folks in the United States on demand.</p>
<p>That&#8217;ll convince almost anybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38084</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38084</guid>
		<description>sashel: &lt;i&gt;Say, if you were Iraqi and hated Saddam would you be still glad for his removal using the methods employed by historically and diplomatically illiterate neoconservatives if that would cause the death of one of your children or husband or relative? Or even you-yourself ?&lt;/i&gt;

See, sash, this is just the sort of question that just makes you and your ilk look -- and there&#039;s no polite term for it, I&#039;m afraid -- a bit slow.  Let me make a few changes and see if that helps you see why (or, if not you, others): &quot;Say, if you were Iraqi and hated America  would you be still side with that country&#039;s historically and diplomatically illiterate enemies if that would cause the death of one of your children or husband or relative? Or even you-yourself?&quot;

And if you think kadet&#039;s points were &quot;legitimate&quot;, I can only speculate what you might think about Bin Laden&#039;s &quot;points&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sashel: <i>Say, if you were Iraqi and hated Saddam would you be still glad for his removal using the methods employed by historically and diplomatically illiterate neoconservatives if that would cause the death of one of your children or husband or relative? Or even you-yourself ?</i></p>
<p>See, sash, this is just the sort of question that just makes you and your ilk look &#8212; and there&#8217;s no polite term for it, I&#8217;m afraid &#8212; a bit slow.  Let me make a few changes and see if that helps you see why (or, if not you, others): &#8220;Say, if you were Iraqi and hated America  would you be still side with that country&#8217;s historically and diplomatically illiterate enemies if that would cause the death of one of your children or husband or relative? Or even you-yourself?&#8221;</p>
<p>And if you think kadet&#8217;s points were &#8220;legitimate&#8221;, I can only speculate what you might think about Bin Laden&#8217;s &#8220;points&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sashal</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38083</link>
		<dc:creator>sashal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2007/07/11/56-41-and-fight-the-senates-latest-vote-on-iraq/#comment-38083</guid>
		<description>yes stumbley, you are an intellectual  light weight.
Keep ignoring , you have no other choice for fear to be exposed as a duped brainwashed fraud, the member of the GOP fan club, no matter how bad or well they play in the tournament.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes stumbley, you are an intellectual  light weight.<br />
Keep ignoring , you have no other choice for fear to be exposed as a duped brainwashed fraud, the member of the GOP fan club, no matter how bad or well they play in the tournament.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

