Comments on: Israeli Press Office: al Durah a hoax

By: Abe Bird

Abe Bird — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:23:22 +0000

More recent news about the French trial:
http://backspin.typepad.com/backspin/2008/02/closing-argumen.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3Z4_11wLjw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzsCBFhCsyY&feature=related

http://www.take-a-pen.org/

http://honestreporting.com/a/alDuraResources.asp

By: info@esmafix.ee

info@esmafix.ee — Thu, 27 Dec 2007 19:26:20 +0000

http://tonyamorse.freeweb7.com/free1158.html

By: Lee

Lee — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:32:24 +0000

Does your free workout guide include tips for staging atroticies?

By: Judicious Asininity

Judicious Asininity — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:59:47 +0000

[...] Neo-Neocon draws out some interesting parallels with Dan Rather’s suit against CBS. The people who celebrated 9/11, largely on our dime, may soon get exposed. I suspect that the late Alex, when shown the “authentic” Bush TANG memo, and the copy made by typing the same words into MS Word, would have said “same”. It says something about Mapes and Rather that they say “different”. That something is “mind-numbingly stupid”. Bird-brained would be grossly unfair to birds. Posted by: Pat on Oct 05, 07 | 12:22 am | [0] comments [0] Views | Permalink | [0] TrackBack | Go to Main Page Random Posts Cultural Relativism Those missing weapons of mass destruction Malibu Babs: Snapshots of an eco-hypocrite var site=”sm6blogger” Judicious Asininity >>www.asininity.com 2004PHP [...]

By: Steve

Steve — Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:34:51 +0000

For some reason, the URL did not convert, so, here again:

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/908851.html

By: Steve

Steve — Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:34:12 +0000

Hi, Neo. When I read the following in Ha’aretz I thought you might be commenting on this. For the sake of balance, so should you.

By: njcommuter

njcommuter — Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:30:49 +0000

It will be good to see the victims of lawfare press a counterattack. A few successful countersuits may do a great deal of good in the court of public opinion. Even if a guilty verdict is not forthcoming, the ugliness may be seen for what it is.

Of course, that depends in part on the MSM. Hmmm ….