Thanks,
Jim Mirkalami

Because it’s always wrong to criticize intolerant, medieval murderers.

“Western appeasement.”

Yes, but with a caveat: Western appeasement has taught Muslims that they can silence their critics by demanding “sensitivity” and “respect”, but these are very recent tactics. For the previous 1400 years Muslims have relied on openly-stated policies of intolerance for dissent, backed up by murder. So Islam deserves to be condemned for its barbaric traditions, and progressives deserve to be condemned for their embrace of barbarism.

No, they are ridiculous comments for anyone to make in a free society. As a poster above mentioned, it took a lot of time and effort by our forebears to rid secular society of blasphemy laws. Our forefathers bequeathed free speech to us for a reason – because it was a necessary part of running a free society. There is simply no cause to reinstate blasphemy laws (religious or secular) through the back door.

How stupid can one be not to see that one day the tools of censorship might very well (and most probably will) fall into the wrong hands? It’s very nearly a given, in fact. Why would you create and give an intellectual and moral imprimatur to a tool that can and will be used against you one day. What will you say then? Oh, that’s right, you won’t say anything for you will have handed over your free speech rights for 30 shekels of silver. I’m not a great believer in slippery slopes but this is one path that it would be foolish to start down.

Western appeasement.

Looks like we are about to find out:

Al Qaeda Comes to Britain

http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2008/01/al-qaeda-comes-to-britain.html

LONDON (Reuters) – Britain’s intelligence services are investigating an Islamist Web site that says it is establishing a branch of al Qaeda in Britain, BBC television reported on Tuesday.

According to the report, security experts fear a posting on the site, http://www.alekhlaas.net, declaring “the creation of the al Qaeda organization in Britain” may be genuine.

I think Siggy thinks Britain can dig themselves out of this hole, but there will come a point in which the energy it takes to dig themselves out will not be within their affordability range.

Also the people that got things to the way they are in Canada, cannot be relied upon to get Canada out of the situation they put her in. So it doesn’t really matter whether their media is talking about incidents like this or not.

Britain has spent decades ensuring that their people are individually weak and incapable of acting on their own initiative. Americans still can be armed in mind, body, and attachment weapons. That’s the critical difference to Canada and Britain.

It is more like cognitive psychology. The belief that so long as you change your thinking, like say to a more multicultural thing, your feelings can get better.

Too many people grew up learning that the only way you get ahead is by sacrificing somebody else you don’t care about to the altar of socialism.

The Arabs when they imbibe free speech gets high on it and overdoses. They get really extreme with such speech and confuse “free” with “can say whatever you want to say”. Not the same thing. In the West, liberty has something called responsibility attached to it.

Then again, Europe stopped being part of the West since awhile ago.

Death tends to conclusively decide things all in all. Theo Van Gogh included. This is why people want to stop America from going to war. Cause they can kill us in peace time and we aren’t allowed to, and this is good for them and bad for us. Whereas in war, we can fight back.

All these loopholes in democracies are there because without those loopholes, it would be called an empire. We’re not even including the multicultural parasitic time bombs put in purposefully to blow up the system.

Neo-Nazis is not an issue to be dealt with by the 1st Amendment, it is dealt with by the 2nd Amendment. You got a problem, you crush it and them.

Of course the Left saw the Nazis before, they allowed it to go up. And we expect the Left to be wise now? They haven’t learned jack. They will screw it up just like they did before, if not more so.

Arabs may be broken, but so is the West. It wouldn’t be a problem if the Arabs were the only broken people around, you know. That war would be really short.

Only the strong can protect the “minority” or “weak”. The only reason Europe can’t tolerate neo-Nazis is because Europe knows that they can’t be trusted to decide upon the rational course in human history. Europe doesn’t have the strength to resist the temptation of evil. America does, though, and that’s why American can tolerate hate speech and not have it go nuclear. Same can’t be said for Europe or even Canada.

Well, I suppose if it makes people feel better that they are willingly destroying their way of life, instead of the fear of terrorism, then I suppose that’s how people are.

They’re not supposed to imagine what will happen to the tool when the tool is of no use. That’s not what they are for.

It is exactly what the Left wanted. It just so happens that most of the Left are made up of useful idiots. Only the elite and the intellectual spiritual leaders know what is really up.

“but what on Earth made” some “Muslims this sensitive in the first place”

Because we ignore their supremacy? It has got to hurt to see dhimmis wealthier and more powerful. At one time the stretch and wealth of Islam made the Roman Empire look backwater by comparison.

But then again, look at what Christians do when their religion is insulted. They take out petitions. Have you ever been hit by a petition? It hurts. And the papercuts!!