Comments on: Foreign policy hypocrisy http://neoneocon.com/2008/04/10/foreign-policy-hypocrisy/ Fri, 04 Jul 2008 08:07:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1 By: expat http://neoneocon.com/2008/04/10/foreign-policy-hypocrisy/#comment-63530 expat Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:09:06 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2008/04/10/foreign-policy-hypocrisy/#comment-63530 I read that he spent 3 whole weeks in Pakistan--yep that ought to do it. And his great Indonesian experience was as a child, when I'm sure he was interested in the fine points of diplomacy. What an arrogant idiot. He doesn't even begin to know what he doesn't know. I read that he spent 3 whole weeks in Pakistan–yep that ought to do it. And his great Indonesian experience was as a child, when I’m sure he was interested in the fine points of diplomacy. What an arrogant idiot. He doesn’t even begin to know what he doesn’t know.

]]> By: Vanderleun http://neoneocon.com/2008/04/10/foreign-policy-hypocrisy/#comment-63535 Vanderleun Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:58:14 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2008/04/10/foreign-policy-hypocrisy/#comment-63535 Well, he knows how stupid a large chunk of Americans are. That's a start. Well, he knows how stupid a large chunk of Americans are. That’s a start.

]]> By: strcpy http://neoneocon.com/2008/04/10/foreign-policy-hypocrisy/#comment-63583 strcpy Fri, 11 Apr 2008 05:45:41 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2008/04/10/foreign-policy-hypocrisy/#comment-63583 "He doesn’t even begin to know what he doesn’t know." My guess is that he is one that made fun of Rumsfeld's whole "unknown unknowns" statement because they didn't understand it. How can you have unknown unknowns when you, well, know everything? “He doesn’t even begin to know what he doesn’t know.”

My guess is that he is one that made fun of Rumsfeld’s whole “unknown unknowns” statement because they didn’t understand it.

How can you have unknown unknowns when you, well, know everything?

]]> By: Ymarsakar http://neoneocon.com/2008/04/10/foreign-policy-hypocrisy/#comment-63652 Ymarsakar Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:51:27 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2008/04/10/foreign-policy-hypocrisy/#comment-63652 <b>I suppose “dignity-promotion” is only a good thing if it’s a Democratic administration doing the promoting.</b> Spending money is all well and good, Neo, but if you aren't the one in power spending it, then what good does that do your ideological tribe, Neo? No, good at all. Sure, Republicans refused to question and attack Roosevelt's war policy in WWII, even though they had torpedoes that refused to explode in the Pacific, thus endangering US submarine crews, but we're talking about Democrats not being in power here. And that's unacceptable, Neo. I suppose “dignity-promotion” is only a good thing if it’s a Democratic administration doing the promoting.

Spending money is all well and good, Neo, but if you aren’t the one in power spending it, then what good does that do your ideological tribe, Neo?

No, good at all. Sure, Republicans refused to question and attack Roosevelt’s war policy in WWII, even though they had torpedoes that refused to explode in the Pacific, thus endangering US submarine crews, but we’re talking about Democrats not being in power here. And that’s unacceptable, Neo.

]]>