<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The WaPo isn&#8217;t pleased with Obama today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:55:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75526</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75526</guid>
		<description>Bonnie Erbe, columnist, wrote today in connection with Obama&#039;s flip-flopping: &quot;There are many, many other examples, some of which I&#039;ve noted in prior posts. Change we can believe in? No, change we can count on, because as soon as he takes a position, we can count on the fact he&#039;s going to change it in front of the next audience.&quot;

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/erbe/2008/6/23/barack-obama-serial-flip-flopper.html

~&#039;Change we can count on&#039; sounds like as good a bumper sticker as I&#039;ve come across in a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonnie Erbe, columnist, wrote today in connection with Obama&#8217;s flip-flopping: &#8220;There are many, many other examples, some of which I&#8217;ve noted in prior posts. Change we can believe in? No, change we can count on, because as soon as he takes a position, we can count on the fact he&#8217;s going to change it in front of the next audience.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usnews.com/blogs/erbe/2008/6/23/barack-obama-serial-flip-flopper.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.usnews.com/blogs/erbe/2008/6/23/barack-obama-serial-flip-flopper.html</a></p>
<p>~&#8217;Change we can count on&#8217; sounds like as good a bumper sticker as I&#8217;ve come across in a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strcpy</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75311</link>
		<dc:creator>strcpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 06:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75311</guid>
		<description>&quot;I was thinking — does anyone think this might cause some backlash accruing benefit to the right? &quot;

Depends on what you mean by the &quot;Right&quot;. If you mean the 90&#039;s Contract with America Right then very much - in fact there has *never* been a period where that philosophy has failed to win elections. As of right now with the Republicans in the Toilet and the Dems in the plumbing a small govt strong defense candidate who promotes lower taxes and increasing oil drilling/refinery would sweep the elections in a heart beat (otherwise known as &quot;The Right&quot;). 

If by the &quot;Right&quot; you mean Republicans (and this seems to be what you mean) then most likely not. They aren&#039;t really liked and the fact that the Democrats are liked even less will not cause some type of backlash. 

Further any individual election tends to be more based on personalities than party. For many a year a Democrat Vs Republican Democrat wins. In the last election cycle Bush vs a Democrat the Democrat won by a large margin. However Bush Vs Kerry and, well, who was president with the popular vote by a fairly large percentage?

As is we have either a strong global warming, anti-defense, huge govt, environmentalist candidate vs a weak global warming, large govt, environmentalist that is at least strong on defense. McCain wins there but not because he is good, but because he isn&#039;t as bad. However since neither is really liked they both can easily sink to the bottom quickly.

Were the Republicans to go back and actually do the Contract With America idea they would do well with both their base *and* the general public. I will never ever understand why after sweeping elections with that message they abandoned it to embrace what the ones they soundly defeated believed in. Yea, I get that the news media harped on it - but hey you freaking killed the competition when they predicted mass failure so why remotely believe them? At some point a conservative party is going to have to come about that realizes that the media is totally against them and just do what wins them elections, not what makes the MsM happy. We have a truly liberal party but do not have a truly conservative - the only time we came close we soundly thumped the liberals and then caved to them complaining about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I was thinking — does anyone think this might cause some backlash accruing benefit to the right? &#8221;</p>
<p>Depends on what you mean by the &#8220;Right&#8221;. If you mean the 90&#8242;s Contract with America Right then very much &#8211; in fact there has *never* been a period where that philosophy has failed to win elections. As of right now with the Republicans in the Toilet and the Dems in the plumbing a small govt strong defense candidate who promotes lower taxes and increasing oil drilling/refinery would sweep the elections in a heart beat (otherwise known as &#8220;The Right&#8221;). </p>
<p>If by the &#8220;Right&#8221; you mean Republicans (and this seems to be what you mean) then most likely not. They aren&#8217;t really liked and the fact that the Democrats are liked even less will not cause some type of backlash. </p>
<p>Further any individual election tends to be more based on personalities than party. For many a year a Democrat Vs Republican Democrat wins. In the last election cycle Bush vs a Democrat the Democrat won by a large margin. However Bush Vs Kerry and, well, who was president with the popular vote by a fairly large percentage?</p>
<p>As is we have either a strong global warming, anti-defense, huge govt, environmentalist candidate vs a weak global warming, large govt, environmentalist that is at least strong on defense. McCain wins there but not because he is good, but because he isn&#8217;t as bad. However since neither is really liked they both can easily sink to the bottom quickly.</p>
<p>Were the Republicans to go back and actually do the Contract With America idea they would do well with both their base *and* the general public. I will never ever understand why after sweeping elections with that message they abandoned it to embrace what the ones they soundly defeated believed in. Yea, I get that the news media harped on it &#8211; but hey you freaking killed the competition when they predicted mass failure so why remotely believe them? At some point a conservative party is going to have to come about that realizes that the media is totally against them and just do what wins them elections, not what makes the MsM happy. We have a truly liberal party but do not have a truly conservative &#8211; the only time we came close we soundly thumped the liberals and then caved to them complaining about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince P</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75306</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75306</guid>
		<description>I just watched the most unique anti-Obama video ever 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_R6gcbC9Hz4

This one seems to be making analogies between the movement that formed the Weather Underground, and the crowd that is forming around Obama today.


And if i&#039;m not mistaken, the message, from former underground members, is ... dont repeat our misakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just watched the most unique anti-Obama video ever </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_R6gcbC9Hz4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_R6gcbC9Hz4</a></p>
<p>This one seems to be making analogies between the movement that formed the Weather Underground, and the crowd that is forming around Obama today.</p>
<p>And if i&#8217;m not mistaken, the message, from former underground members, is &#8230; dont repeat our misakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrapiron</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75300</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrapiron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75300</guid>
		<description>O&#039;dumbo set up collection sites all over the middle east with instructions on how much and hot to send money so he didn&#039;t have to identify the donor. At one time the link was on his site, it disappeared, the Middle East sites are in operation. He even has two &#039;fund raisers&#039; scheduled in Communist China. Clinton/Gore gave them the guidance system for the missiles they are using today. Wonder what O&#039;dumbo promised them out of the U.S. military warehouse? He is set to be the most &#039;bought&#039; by foreign money POTUS in history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#8217;dumbo set up collection sites all over the middle east with instructions on how much and hot to send money so he didn&#8217;t have to identify the donor. At one time the link was on his site, it disappeared, the Middle East sites are in operation. He even has two &#8216;fund raisers&#8217; scheduled in Communist China. Clinton/Gore gave them the guidance system for the missiles they are using today. Wonder what O&#8217;dumbo promised them out of the U.S. military warehouse? He is set to be the most &#8216;bought&#8217; by foreign money POTUS in history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrapiron</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75297</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrapiron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 04:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75297</guid>
		<description>O&#039;dumbo says &#039;this is not the O&#039;dumbo I&#039;ve known for 40 years&#039;. Yes it is, a liar who evidently doesn&#039;t know when he lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#8217;dumbo says &#8216;this is not the O&#8217;dumbo I&#8217;ve known for 40 years&#8217;. Yes it is, a liar who evidently doesn&#8217;t know when he lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FredHjr</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75288</link>
		<dc:creator>FredHjr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 03:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75288</guid>
		<description>Obonga&#039;s nose keeps getting longer.  Most certainly a &quot;change.&quot;

The more things change the longer it gets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obonga&#8217;s nose keeps getting longer.  Most certainly a &#8220;change.&#8221;</p>
<p>The more things change the longer it gets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bad haikumenter</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75280</link>
		<dc:creator>bad haikumenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75280</guid>
		<description>Hot embrace of cash
Change you can believe in - tossed:
Under the short bus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hot embrace of cash<br />
Change you can believe in &#8211; tossed:<br />
Under the short bus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince P</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75276</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 00:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75276</guid>
		<description>How do they know where this credit card money is coming from?  how can international funds be detected?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do they know where this credit card money is coming from?  how can international funds be detected?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cSimon</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75275</link>
		<dc:creator>cSimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 00:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75275</guid>
		<description>&quot;The techniques of Internet fund-raising that his aides have so effectively mastered could in a future election be used to assemble a mass donor base with a more self-interested agenda.”


Gee......ya think?   In a FUTURE election?  (Well...November IS in the future...)

I was thinking -- does anyone think this might cause some backlash accruing benefit to the right?  Obama&#039;s really piling on those straws on my camel&#039;s back and it&#039;s sure tempting me to write a check as big as I can afford to either McCain or Republican Party!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The techniques of Internet fund-raising that his aides have so effectively mastered could in a future election be used to assemble a mass donor base with a more self-interested agenda.”</p>
<p>Gee&#8230;&#8230;ya think?   In a FUTURE election?  (Well&#8230;November IS in the future&#8230;)</p>
<p>I was thinking &#8212; does anyone think this might cause some backlash accruing benefit to the right?  Obama&#8217;s really piling on those straws on my camel&#8217;s back and it&#8217;s sure tempting me to write a check as big as I can afford to either McCain or Republican Party!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75274</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/06/20/the-wapo-isnt-pleased-with-obama-today/#comment-75274</guid>
		<description>I wonder if WaPo is beginning to get a little scared at the idea of Obama actually winning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if WaPo is beginning to get a little scared at the idea of Obama actually winning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

