<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The evolution of Queen Nancy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: neo-neocon</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109664</link>
		<dc:creator>neo-neocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109664</guid>
		<description>Baklava: your comment ties in nicely with &lt;a href=&quot;http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/18/surprise-the-rich-act-in-their-own-self-interest-when-taxed/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one of today&#039;s posts&lt;/a&gt;.  As does the link you offered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baklava: your comment ties in nicely with <a href="http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/18/surprise-the-rich-act-in-their-own-self-interest-when-taxed/" rel="nofollow">one of today&#8217;s posts</a>.  As does the link you offered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109658</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109658</guid>
		<description>There is a grand total of 13% Republicans because all the smart people are leaving.....

Only the felons, illegal immigrants, free loaders (wanting college for free) and hardcore leftists are left as the NORMAL people can&#039;t take the assault on their pocket book to pay for that crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a grand total of 13% Republicans because all the smart people are leaving&#8230;..</p>
<p>Only the felons, illegal immigrants, free loaders (wanting college for free) and hardcore leftists are left as the NORMAL people can&#8217;t take the assault on their pocket book to pay for that crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huxley</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109547</link>
		<dc:creator>huxley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 19:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109547</guid>
		<description>Nice job, someone-else!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job, someone-else!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artfldgr</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109544</link>
		<dc:creator>Artfldgr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 17:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109544</guid>
		<description>&quot;She is the Napoleon of crime, FredHjr. She is the organizer of half that is evil and of nearly all that is undetected in this great city. She is a genius, a philosopher, an abstract thinker. She has a brain of the first order. She sits motionless, like a spider in the center of its web, but that web has a thousand radiations, and she knows well every quiver of each of them. She does little herself. She only plans. But her agents are numerous and splendidly organized. Is there a crime to be done, a paper to be abstracted, we will say, a house to be rifled, a man to be removed -- the word is passed to the &quot;Professor&quot;, the matter is organized and carried out. The agent may be caught. In that case money is found for his bail or his defence. But the central power which uses the agent is never caught -- never so much as suspected.&quot; Sherlock Holmes, in &quot;The Final Problem&quot;

couldnt resist...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;She is the Napoleon of crime, FredHjr. She is the organizer of half that is evil and of nearly all that is undetected in this great city. She is a genius, a philosopher, an abstract thinker. She has a brain of the first order. She sits motionless, like a spider in the center of its web, but that web has a thousand radiations, and she knows well every quiver of each of them. She does little herself. She only plans. But her agents are numerous and splendidly organized. Is there a crime to be done, a paper to be abstracted, we will say, a house to be rifled, a man to be removed &#8212; the word is passed to the &#8220;Professor&#8221;, the matter is organized and carried out. The agent may be caught. In that case money is found for his bail or his defence. But the central power which uses the agent is never caught &#8212; never so much as suspected.&#8221; Sherlock Holmes, in &#8220;The Final Problem&#8221;</p>
<p>couldnt resist&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artfldgr</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109543</link>
		<dc:creator>Artfldgr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 17:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109543</guid>
		<description>she is now starting to back peddle faster than a drunk clown falling backwards on a unicycle!!!


&lt;i&gt;House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has backed down slightly in her fight with the CIA, saying that she really meant only to criticize the Bush administration rather than career officials.

&quot;My criticism of the manner in which the Bush Administration did not appropriately inform Congress is separate from my respect for those in the intelligence community who work to keep our country safe,&quot; Pelosi said in a statement.
&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;b&gt;&quot;As you are aware, Watson, there is no one who knows the higher criminal world of London so well as I do. For years past I have continually been conscious of some power behind the malefactor, some deep organizing power which forever stands in the way of the law, and throws its shield over the wrong-doer. Again and again in cases of the most varying sorts -- forgery cases, robberies, murders -- I have felt the presence of this force, and I have deduced its action in many of those undiscovered crimes in which I have not been personally consulted. For years I have endeavored to break through the veil which shrouded it, and at last the time came when I seized my thread and followed it, until it led me, after a thousand cunning windings, to ex-Professor Moriarty of mathematical celebrity.&quot;


Sherlock Holmes, in &quot;The Final Problem&quot;
&lt;/b&gt;

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>she is now starting to back peddle faster than a drunk clown falling backwards on a unicycle!!!</p>
<p><i>House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has backed down slightly in her fight with the CIA, saying that she really meant only to criticize the Bush administration rather than career officials.</p>
<p>&#8220;My criticism of the manner in which the Bush Administration did not appropriately inform Congress is separate from my respect for those in the intelligence community who work to keep our country safe,&#8221; Pelosi said in a statement.<br />
</i></p>
<p><b>&#8220;As you are aware, Watson, there is no one who knows the higher criminal world of London so well as I do. For years past I have continually been conscious of some power behind the malefactor, some deep organizing power which forever stands in the way of the law, and throws its shield over the wrong-doer. Again and again in cases of the most varying sorts &#8212; forgery cases, robberies, murders &#8212; I have felt the presence of this force, and I have deduced its action in many of those undiscovered crimes in which I have not been personally consulted. For years I have endeavored to break through the veil which shrouded it, and at last the time came when I seized my thread and followed it, until it led me, after a thousand cunning windings, to ex-Professor Moriarty of mathematical celebrity.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sherlock Holmes, in &#8220;The Final Problem&#8221;<br />
</b></p>
<p> <img src='http://neoneocon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grackle</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109542</link>
		<dc:creator>grackle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 16:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109542</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;CIA leaking is never a good thing.&lt;/i&gt;

I feel the same way. The leaks have let her know what the evidence against her will look like if it ever comes down to some kind of legal process, such as a hearing before a committee. The correct response from the CIA is the public statement by Panetta, which was scathing in its contempt for Nancy P. 

The link by nyomythus is nice, Gingrich is very good in debate. By all means let’s have a national debate on this issue. Priceless, especially the interviewer being absolutely blown away by the quick-thinking Gingrich. Too bad there wasn’t a video for more of an impact. 

The Obama team must be extremely chagrined at what they have unleashed. It must be that you get ‘tone-deaf’ when you’ve had nothing but praise from the MSM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>CIA leaking is never a good thing.</i></p>
<p>I feel the same way. The leaks have let her know what the evidence against her will look like if it ever comes down to some kind of legal process, such as a hearing before a committee. The correct response from the CIA is the public statement by Panetta, which was scathing in its contempt for Nancy P. </p>
<p>The link by nyomythus is nice, Gingrich is very good in debate. By all means let’s have a national debate on this issue. Priceless, especially the interviewer being absolutely blown away by the quick-thinking Gingrich. Too bad there wasn’t a video for more of an impact. </p>
<p>The Obama team must be extremely chagrined at what they have unleashed. It must be that you get ‘tone-deaf’ when you’ve had nothing but praise from the MSM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FredHjr</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109541</link>
		<dc:creator>FredHjr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 16:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109541</guid>
		<description>I think that people, including me, who, in order to cope with the results of the election and needing to keep our sanity, laugh at her need to get a grip on the serious side of this.  She is where she is because of the qualities she possesses.  And she perfectly represents the Democratic Party right now.  There is s certain logic to it all, and that chain of logic goes back to George Soros&#039; Open Society Institute.  Obonga also owes fealty to it.  They all do.

It is a hardened, intractable position.  Notice that two days ago, Gen. Odierno had prevailed upon Obonga to relent about releasing the tapes and photos of the waterboarding.  Then, yesterday, the President backtracked on it and now says he will delay the release.  Imagine being a fly on the wall in Odierno&#039;s office at CENTCOM?

I rest my case.  Obonga finally succumbed to pressure from his real master - and it was neither the U.S. military nor his oath of office.

God save our nation from calamity before this is all over.  But maybe He won&#039;t, since God does have a history of letting humanity face the consequences of its own sloth and malice.

Somewhere on a guarded estate on the island of Curacao Georgy Soros is smiling that Cheshire Cat smile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that people, including me, who, in order to cope with the results of the election and needing to keep our sanity, laugh at her need to get a grip on the serious side of this.  She is where she is because of the qualities she possesses.  And she perfectly represents the Democratic Party right now.  There is s certain logic to it all, and that chain of logic goes back to George Soros&#8217; Open Society Institute.  Obonga also owes fealty to it.  They all do.</p>
<p>It is a hardened, intractable position.  Notice that two days ago, Gen. Odierno had prevailed upon Obonga to relent about releasing the tapes and photos of the waterboarding.  Then, yesterday, the President backtracked on it and now says he will delay the release.  Imagine being a fly on the wall in Odierno&#8217;s office at CENTCOM?</p>
<p>I rest my case.  Obonga finally succumbed to pressure from his real master &#8211; and it was neither the U.S. military nor his oath of office.</p>
<p>God save our nation from calamity before this is all over.  But maybe He won&#8217;t, since God does have a history of letting humanity face the consequences of its own sloth and malice.</p>
<p>Somewhere on a guarded estate on the island of Curacao Georgy Soros is smiling that Cheshire Cat smile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oldflyer</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109537</link>
		<dc:creator>Oldflyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109537</guid>
		<description>I believe that Pelosi&#039;s big problem now is the WH.  She has been upstaging the &quot;Big O&quot; a little bit all along; now she has become a major distraction.  She is actually cutting into his face time with the media.  Cannot continue.

This isn&#039;t original with me; but it is curious and a little sad to read that the CIA leaking is now a good thing because they are leaking on the other guys.  CIA leaking is never a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that Pelosi&#8217;s big problem now is the WH.  She has been upstaging the &#8220;Big O&#8221; a little bit all along; now she has become a major distraction.  She is actually cutting into his face time with the media.  Cannot continue.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t original with me; but it is curious and a little sad to read that the CIA leaking is now a good thing because they are leaking on the other guys.  CIA leaking is never a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyomythus</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109534</link>
		<dc:creator>nyomythus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 14:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109534</guid>
		<description>This interview with ABC and Newt Gingrich is very good.

http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex?id=7595688

I&#039;ve thought for a long time that Newt would make a great President. Get &#039;em before he&#039;s too old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This interview with ABC and Newt Gingrich is very good.</p>
<p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex?id=7595688" rel="nofollow">http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex?id=7595688</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve thought for a long time that Newt would make a great President. Get &#8216;em before he&#8217;s too old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artfldgr</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109533</link>
		<dc:creator>Artfldgr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 14:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/15/the-evolution-of-queen-nancy/#comment-109533</guid>
		<description>Oh how i hope all this is an overshoot recovery game.  in that as long as the game was going on, everything will keep moving their way..  the problem being most who are on the left tend to displace the facts of what their side does onto the other side. so the more bad their side does the more they hate the opposite side. as i said, this is what happens in inverted rule and destabilization is inversion of the current system. any other direction and the people would have to consider the argument. but 180 degrees the same symetry exists and so they dont realize they are walking the wrong way. 

since cleaning house would be painful and would show that the people would not be in power, they have to make cleaning house less painful than something else. and so the reason that things are going this far without a lot of opposition is that they are going to let the one side do what they want without moderation of the side that gets the blame. 

when i have an issue. i sometimes let the issue ride for a long long time while making small comments as to it. I am VERY patient. at some point it reaches a head and of course there is some form of argument as to who is to blame or why or what. then i just say, its been going on for several years now, and so there are no more excuses or explanations.

the point is that rather than face things while they are ambiguous, and the games that happen there are not easily assailable. but remove your pressure, concede the territory, remove the ambiguity, show who causes the pain.  then rather have a split force behind you, you will have a unified point from which to work in which cleaning house is possibe because its no longer a painful thing but a less painful thing. 

wishful thinking...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh how i hope all this is an overshoot recovery game.  in that as long as the game was going on, everything will keep moving their way..  the problem being most who are on the left tend to displace the facts of what their side does onto the other side. so the more bad their side does the more they hate the opposite side. as i said, this is what happens in inverted rule and destabilization is inversion of the current system. any other direction and the people would have to consider the argument. but 180 degrees the same symetry exists and so they dont realize they are walking the wrong way. </p>
<p>since cleaning house would be painful and would show that the people would not be in power, they have to make cleaning house less painful than something else. and so the reason that things are going this far without a lot of opposition is that they are going to let the one side do what they want without moderation of the side that gets the blame. </p>
<p>when i have an issue. i sometimes let the issue ride for a long long time while making small comments as to it. I am VERY patient. at some point it reaches a head and of course there is some form of argument as to who is to blame or why or what. then i just say, its been going on for several years now, and so there are no more excuses or explanations.</p>
<p>the point is that rather than face things while they are ambiguous, and the games that happen there are not easily assailable. but remove your pressure, concede the territory, remove the ambiguity, show who causes the pain.  then rather have a split force behind you, you will have a unified point from which to work in which cleaning house is possibe because its no longer a painful thing but a less painful thing. </p>
<p>wishful thinking&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

