<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama the car czar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:36:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean the Maggot</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110396</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean the Maggot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 09:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110396</guid>
		<description>&quot;Also, where the heck did the figure 39 come from? Why not 38 or 40? I think it came out of thin air.&quot;

Mr.  Frank

Nah, think lower and also body cavity.

&quot;...they will save us billions of dollars in money we’ve been sending to the Persian Gulf and elsewhere...&quot;


Mitsu

Dude, it&#039;s called &quot;domestic oil production&quot;.  No, it&#039;s not just for oil, it&#039;s also for petroleum products that you use in the production of plastics and other materials.  Can you say polyester?  Surely you must be thinking of those leisure suits you heard about, that is true.  Hmmm, go a head and take off that R.E.I fleece you&#039;s wearin&#039; and look inside the collar, vas dis?  POLYESTER!!!!!

Energy independence is a nice goal we want to get to, but the current plan just don&#039;t factor in the domestic need for oil and the use of domestic production during the transition period to cleaner and greener fuel.  

Clue, get some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Also, where the heck did the figure 39 come from? Why not 38 or 40? I think it came out of thin air.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mr.  Frank</p>
<p>Nah, think lower and also body cavity.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;they will save us billions of dollars in money we’ve been sending to the Persian Gulf and elsewhere&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Mitsu</p>
<p>Dude, it&#8217;s called &#8220;domestic oil production&#8221;.  No, it&#8217;s not just for oil, it&#8217;s also for petroleum products that you use in the production of plastics and other materials.  Can you say polyester?  Surely you must be thinking of those leisure suits you heard about, that is true.  Hmmm, go a head and take off that R.E.I fleece you&#8217;s wearin&#8217; and look inside the collar, vas dis?  POLYESTER!!!!!</p>
<p>Energy independence is a nice goal we want to get to, but the current plan just don&#8217;t factor in the domestic need for oil and the use of domestic production during the transition period to cleaner and greener fuel.  </p>
<p>Clue, get some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artfldgr</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110181</link>
		<dc:creator>Artfldgr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 22:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110181</guid>
		<description>waltj  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>waltj  <img src='http://neoneocon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gringo</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110100</link>
		<dc:creator>Gringo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110100</guid>
		<description>My remark about emissions  standards related to decades past. How they are right now, I don&#039;t know, but I doubt that they are currently much less stringent than the rest of the world. 

Consider the air quality of the LA basin 40 years ago, and the # of cars then and now. Much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My remark about emissions  standards related to decades past. How they are right now, I don&#8217;t know, but I doubt that they are currently much less stringent than the rest of the world. </p>
<p>Consider the air quality of the LA basin 40 years ago, and the # of cars then and now. Much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gringo</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110098</link>
		<dc:creator>Gringo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 03:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110098</guid>
		<description>The point about  putting in mileage and/or emission standards right now is that you couldn&#039;t pick a worse time to implement them. The auto industry is under a great amount of stress like now. More stringent standards will simply make it less likely that it will recover.

BTW, US emission standards were way ahead of the rest of the world. 

Having Obama run the auto industry is like putting a 14 year old behind a semi on a curving mountain road. He couldn&#039;t even run the Annenberg Challenge, and he thinks he can run the auto industry? Lords preserve us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point about  putting in mileage and/or emission standards right now is that you couldn&#8217;t pick a worse time to implement them. The auto industry is under a great amount of stress like now. More stringent standards will simply make it less likely that it will recover.</p>
<p>BTW, US emission standards were way ahead of the rest of the world. </p>
<p>Having Obama run the auto industry is like putting a 14 year old behind a semi on a curving mountain road. He couldn&#8217;t even run the Annenberg Challenge, and he thinks he can run the auto industry? Lords preserve us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waltj</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110055</link>
		<dc:creator>waltj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 18:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110055</guid>
		<description>&quot;...one of the more interesting thing to see in indonesia is a family of 6 on one motor scooter...&quot;

Saw 8 in Cambodia once.  Dad, driving, Mom (holding baby), Grandpa, four young kids (one in front of dad, one between Mom &amp; Dad, one on Grandpa&#039;s lap, one behind him).  Plus a dog and a chicken.  And not a helmet in sight.  It was truly amazing.  But 6 is also the max I&#039;ve seen in Indonesia.  If Obama wants to ride around that way, that&#039;s his business, but he shouldn&#039;t be forcing it on the rest of us.  But &quot;for thee, not for me...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;one of the more interesting thing to see in indonesia is a family of 6 on one motor scooter&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Saw 8 in Cambodia once.  Dad, driving, Mom (holding baby), Grandpa, four young kids (one in front of dad, one between Mom &amp; Dad, one on Grandpa&#8217;s lap, one behind him).  Plus a dog and a chicken.  And not a helmet in sight.  It was truly amazing.  But 6 is also the max I&#8217;ve seen in Indonesia.  If Obama wants to ride around that way, that&#8217;s his business, but he shouldn&#8217;t be forcing it on the rest of us.  But &#8220;for thee, not for me&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomass</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110052</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110052</guid>
		<description>jackscrow Says: 

&quot;Nothing more deserving or entertaining than Union Thugs beating and getting beaten by Government Thugs!&quot;

Blue on blue!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jackscrow Says: </p>
<p>&#8220;Nothing more deserving or entertaining than Union Thugs beating and getting beaten by Government Thugs!&#8221;</p>
<p>Blue on blue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110051</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110051</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Mitsu Says: 

May 20th, 2009 at 7:09 pm 
You guys are writing as though these mandates only apply to American car manufacturers. They don’t — they will apply to ALL manufacturers, obviously, foreign and domestic, across the board. And they’re long overdue, as they will save us billions of dollars in money we’ve been sending to the Persian Gulf and elsewhere. Not to mention reducing greenhouse gases and pollution.

Furthermore these standards are already in place in Europe, Japan, and elsewhere. We’re simply playing catch-up.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Mitsu, I don&#039;t believe that the rest of the world has such strict emission standards. Car companies specifically make cars for US vs non US, and the US ones are typically the neutered version. That&#039;s why some of the best Jeep and Toyota products are sold elsewhere, but not in the US. 

You will also note that some of the most efficient vehicles are not sold in the US. The reason is that CAFE standards are at odds with efficiency; hence our industry is hampered at attaining top fuel efficiency.

Furthermore, CAFE has hampered efficiency by punishing big cars, with the result that people now buy trucks. The 70s station wagon was replaced by minivans and SUVs, an unintended consequence of CAFE. This Obamanation will further this effect. Soon, everyone will be driving a truck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Mitsu Says: </p>
<p>May 20th, 2009 at 7:09 pm<br />
You guys are writing as though these mandates only apply to American car manufacturers. They don’t — they will apply to ALL manufacturers, obviously, foreign and domestic, across the board. And they’re long overdue, as they will save us billions of dollars in money we’ve been sending to the Persian Gulf and elsewhere. Not to mention reducing greenhouse gases and pollution.</p>
<p>Furthermore these standards are already in place in Europe, Japan, and elsewhere. We’re simply playing catch-up.</p></blockquote>
<p>Mitsu, I don&#8217;t believe that the rest of the world has such strict emission standards. Car companies specifically make cars for US vs non US, and the US ones are typically the neutered version. That&#8217;s why some of the best Jeep and Toyota products are sold elsewhere, but not in the US. </p>
<p>You will also note that some of the most efficient vehicles are not sold in the US. The reason is that CAFE standards are at odds with efficiency; hence our industry is hampered at attaining top fuel efficiency.</p>
<p>Furthermore, CAFE has hampered efficiency by punishing big cars, with the result that people now buy trucks. The 70s station wagon was replaced by minivans and SUVs, an unintended consequence of CAFE. This Obamanation will further this effect. Soon, everyone will be driving a truck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armchair pessimist</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110047</link>
		<dc:creator>armchair pessimist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110047</guid>
		<description>One reason why there isn&#039;t more indignation is that Obama is continuing a process that began  with TR and Wilson.  To take a trivial example of just how thoroughly we&#039;ve been tamed to follow the Federal Government&#039;s orders, take Daylight Savings.  Twice a year we all change our clocks...like clocks. 

Face it.  We&#039;ve all been slowly marinated in the sauce of Government knows best and now America is cooked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One reason why there isn&#8217;t more indignation is that Obama is continuing a process that began  with TR and Wilson.  To take a trivial example of just how thoroughly we&#8217;ve been tamed to follow the Federal Government&#8217;s orders, take Daylight Savings.  Twice a year we all change our clocks&#8230;like clocks. </p>
<p>Face it.  We&#8217;ve all been slowly marinated in the sauce of Government knows best and now America is cooked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110044</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110044</guid>
		<description>Just thinking out loud: what will happen if Detroit makes a bunch of trucks and SUVs they can&#039;t sell because people aren&#039;t buying enough hybrids/electrics to offset the bigger vehicles? BOGO sales? The buyer parks his tiny smart car and doesn&#039;t drive it much. Old large cars start appreciating on the used car market? I forsee waiting lists to buy large cars and the government subsidizing (picking your pocket) the purchase of small cars. More bailout money to the automakers.  Isn&#039;t ownership of corporations by the government the definition of fascism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thinking out loud: what will happen if Detroit makes a bunch of trucks and SUVs they can&#8217;t sell because people aren&#8217;t buying enough hybrids/electrics to offset the bigger vehicles? BOGO sales? The buyer parks his tiny smart car and doesn&#8217;t drive it much. Old large cars start appreciating on the used car market? I forsee waiting lists to buy large cars and the government subsidizing (picking your pocket) the purchase of small cars. More bailout money to the automakers.  Isn&#8217;t ownership of corporations by the government the definition of fascism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: br549</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110043</link>
		<dc:creator>br549</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/20/obama-the-car-czar/#comment-110043</guid>
		<description>Just because because I&#039;m paranoid doesn&#039;t mean my own government isn&#039;t out to get me.

Never miss an opportunity to take advantage of ........

I submit the current catastrophes were oh so more than &quot;allowed to happen&quot; in order to &quot;take advantage of it&quot;.

Too many things have occurred at once, basically, and fallen into place, causing the constituent freezing fear that has allowed us to be where we are. W is way too silent. Surely, he has a mouthful he could say. Quietest ex-president I&#039;ve ever seen. I mean...the man has disappeared. Is it him, or the MSM making sure he is missing by exclusion? They don&#039;t even seem to be curious. I never hear a word from them wondering where Bush is and what he&#039;s doing.

We are at a point where one can no longer look at these things individually. The cumulative result is what matters. The snowflakes have become avalanche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because because I&#8217;m paranoid doesn&#8217;t mean my own government isn&#8217;t out to get me.</p>
<p>Never miss an opportunity to take advantage of &#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>I submit the current catastrophes were oh so more than &#8220;allowed to happen&#8221; in order to &#8220;take advantage of it&#8221;.</p>
<p>Too many things have occurred at once, basically, and fallen into place, causing the constituent freezing fear that has allowed us to be where we are. W is way too silent. Surely, he has a mouthful he could say. Quietest ex-president I&#8217;ve ever seen. I mean&#8230;the man has disappeared. Is it him, or the MSM making sure he is missing by exclusion? They don&#8217;t even seem to be curious. I never hear a word from them wondering where Bush is and what he&#8217;s doing.</p>
<p>We are at a point where one can no longer look at these things individually. The cumulative result is what matters. The snowflakes have become avalanche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

