<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The strategy behind Obama&#8217;s war on Fox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:12:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peggy Katsch</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-183257</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggy Katsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-183257</guid>
		<description>Who knows what happens next... All I know is: 

Don’t let yesterday take up to much of today. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who knows what happens next&#8230; All I know is: </p>
<p>Don’t let yesterday take up to much of today. <img src='http://neoneocon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Driscoll &#187; The Flak Catchers Continue To Mao-Mao</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-130393</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Driscoll &#187; The Flak Catchers Continue To Mao-Mao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-130393</guid>
		<description>[...] Neo-Neocon on the five-step strategy behind Obama’s war on Fox. Filed under: Liberal Fascism, Oh, That Liberal Media!, The Memory [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Neo-Neocon on the five-step strategy behind Obama’s war on Fox. Filed under: Liberal Fascism, Oh, That Liberal Media!, The Memory [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mia</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-129778</link>
		<dc:creator>Mia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-129778</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always been a Republican - but after last year when McCain ran back to sign a bailout bill, I call myself an independent fiscal/social conservative.  

Anyway, I used to think Glenn Beck was nuts.  Then, he broke the story about ACORN...then Vann Jones.  I have become a fan and, although I don&#039;t watch every night - and I hate it when he gets all emotional and sheds tears (I&#039;m very cynical)- I do watch when I have a chance.  I put the coffee on about 5 minutes before 5 pm and stake my claim on the TV.  In fact, my 11 y/o daughter sometimes watches (a little) with me.  I (jokingly) tell her to join me for some right-wing propaganda!  ;)

I love what he&#039;s done with the Anita Dunn story.  I watched the video again online, but I can&#039;t stand to see her tongue darting in and out of her mouth like a lizard.  Her mouth seemed to be very dry because she was nervous or something.

As for why Obama&#039;s attacking Fox - I&#039;m not sure.  But I wouldn&#039;t give them too much credit for being slick or wiley or having some sort of stragegy behind it.  Why is he letting the Russians inspect our nuclear facilities?  Why is he spending so much money?  Most importantly, why did he go 70 days without talking to General McChrystal, but had the time to go off willy nilly on a mission to get the Olympics for Chicago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always been a Republican &#8211; but after last year when McCain ran back to sign a bailout bill, I call myself an independent fiscal/social conservative.  </p>
<p>Anyway, I used to think Glenn Beck was nuts.  Then, he broke the story about ACORN&#8230;then Vann Jones.  I have become a fan and, although I don&#8217;t watch every night &#8211; and I hate it when he gets all emotional and sheds tears (I&#8217;m very cynical)- I do watch when I have a chance.  I put the coffee on about 5 minutes before 5 pm and stake my claim on the TV.  In fact, my 11 y/o daughter sometimes watches (a little) with me.  I (jokingly) tell her to join me for some right-wing propaganda!  <img src='http://neoneocon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I love what he&#8217;s done with the Anita Dunn story.  I watched the video again online, but I can&#8217;t stand to see her tongue darting in and out of her mouth like a lizard.  Her mouth seemed to be very dry because she was nervous or something.</p>
<p>As for why Obama&#8217;s attacking Fox &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure.  But I wouldn&#8217;t give them too much credit for being slick or wiley or having some sort of stragegy behind it.  Why is he letting the Russians inspect our nuclear facilities?  Why is he spending so much money?  Most importantly, why did he go 70 days without talking to General McChrystal, but had the time to go off willy nilly on a mission to get the Olympics for Chicago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-129758</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-129758</guid>
		<description>This is being way overthought: Abusers don&#039;t have strategies for attacking those around them; they have justifications after the fact.  

Politicians in general don&#039;t rate high in the forethought area; they succeed by telling people what they want to hear right now, not by invoking &quot;what about the day after tomorrow&quot; - and the current group of fools is worse in this area than most. 

Fox was attacked because it seemed like a good idea at the time, or in the words of every wife beater, &quot;The B**ch deserved it.&quot;

I am sure also, that like every abuser, they are genuinely confused as to why anyone thinks this is a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is being way overthought: Abusers don&#8217;t have strategies for attacking those around them; they have justifications after the fact.  </p>
<p>Politicians in general don&#8217;t rate high in the forethought area; they succeed by telling people what they want to hear right now, not by invoking &#8220;what about the day after tomorrow&#8221; &#8211; and the current group of fools is worse in this area than most. </p>
<p>Fox was attacked because it seemed like a good idea at the time, or in the words of every wife beater, &#8220;The B**ch deserved it.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am sure also, that like every abuser, they are genuinely confused as to why anyone thinks this is a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opining Online &#187; Obama&#8217;s &#8220;War&#8221; on Fox News</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-129582</link>
		<dc:creator>Opining Online &#187; Obama&#8217;s &#8220;War&#8221; on Fox News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-129582</guid>
		<description>[...] neo-neocon may be correct in her assessment of the strategy behind Obama&#8217;s war on Fox, I think it&#8217;s possible that she is over-thinking the whole [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] neo-neocon may be correct in her assessment of the strategy behind Obama&#8217;s war on Fox, I think it&#8217;s possible that she is over-thinking the whole [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gringo</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-129579</link>
		<dc:creator>Gringo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-129579</guid>
		<description>Ted: which shows that &#8709;bama   and much of the left consider Fox and Rethuglicans to be greater enemies than Bin Laden and the Mullahs.

Talk sweetly with the Mullahs, but grind the Rethuglicans into the ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted: which shows that &empty;bama   and much of the left consider Fox and Rethuglicans to be greater enemies than Bin Laden and the Mullahs.</p>
<p>Talk sweetly with the Mullahs, but grind the Rethuglicans into the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-129551</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-129551</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Barry Soetaro calls his own guiding diplomatic principle &quot;ridiculous&quot;&lt;/b&gt;
&quot;...the notion that somehow not talking to them is punishment to them — which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of this administration - is ridiculous.&quot;

It adheres to the Obama Formula
Words ≠ Actions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Barry Soetaro calls his own guiding diplomatic principle &#8220;ridiculous&#8221;</b><br />
&#8220;&#8230;the notion that somehow not talking to them is punishment to them — which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of this administration &#8211; is ridiculous.&#8221;</p>
<p>It adheres to the Obama Formula<br />
Words ≠ Actions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occam's Beard</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-129524</link>
		<dc:creator>Occam's Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-129524</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Unless Obama is always playing two or three moves ahead of everyone&lt;/i&gt;

I think the Skip Gates fiasco puts paid to that notion, as does (especially) the Olympics one. 

There&#039;s nothing Europeans (of pretty much any political stripe) love more than sticking a finger in Uncle Sam&#039;s nose. (It&#039;s the way many feel about seeing the NY Yankees lose.) 

An American President coming over hat in hand to grovel before the Europeans to get something from them? My wife (whom I met in Europe) and I rolled our eyes and laughed. That was just was too much temptation for flesh and blood to resist. If only we had a department that was familiar with matters of state...

So two or three steps ahead? No. Two or three steps &lt;i&gt;behind&lt;/i&gt; looks like a better bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Unless Obama is always playing two or three moves ahead of everyone</i></p>
<p>I think the Skip Gates fiasco puts paid to that notion, as does (especially) the Olympics one. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing Europeans (of pretty much any political stripe) love more than sticking a finger in Uncle Sam&#8217;s nose. (It&#8217;s the way many feel about seeing the NY Yankees lose.) </p>
<p>An American President coming over hat in hand to grovel before the Europeans to get something from them? My wife (whom I met in Europe) and I rolled our eyes and laughed. That was just was too much temptation for flesh and blood to resist. If only we had a department that was familiar with matters of state&#8230;</p>
<p>So two or three steps ahead? No. Two or three steps <i>behind</i> looks like a better bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama: &#8220;Not talking&#8230;is ridiculous&#8221; &#187; The Anchoress &#124; A First Things Blog</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-129511</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama: &#8220;Not talking&#8230;is ridiculous&#8221; &#187; The Anchoress &#124; A First Things Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-129511</guid>
		<description>[...] But even I would never have imagined that he would carry this over to an entire cable news network! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But even I would never have imagined that he would carry this over to an entire cable news network! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artfldgr</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-129494</link>
		<dc:creator>Artfldgr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/10/13/the-strategy-behind-obamas-war-on-fox/#comment-129494</guid>
		<description>we should have a thread on the left MAKING false history. 

from this fox thing...  which will later label fox this way if they succeed... to the false i can see russia statement... to fake nooses, swasticas, etc. 

stuff like this... 
&quot;You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray…” phony quote has been traced back to a left-wing blogger using the handle &quot;Cobra,&quot; who began seeding the quote on left-wing blogs beginning in 2005. The quote has also been linked to an activist with the Communist Party-USA. 

and =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

For those of you have been watching the sad descent of LGF Blogger Charles &quot;Nancy&quot; Johnson into deranged moonbattery, this latest comes as sweet irony. The guy who exposed the Dan Rather TANG Memos as forgeries, is now using the Dan Rather Defense on his own allegations. Nancy posted the phony/out-of-context Rush Limbaugh quotes. When someone pointed out that it at least one was fake, Nancy shrieked &quot;The quote is disputed, but it has not been proven false.&quot; This is exactly how Dan Rather defends the TANG memos to this very day. 


you can put it ALL into one category of making history rather than lettig history happen. 

the whole effort on fox is to control history, not let it happen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we should have a thread on the left MAKING false history. </p>
<p>from this fox thing&#8230;  which will later label fox this way if they succeed&#8230; to the false i can see russia statement&#8230; to fake nooses, swasticas, etc. </p>
<p>stuff like this&#8230;<br />
&#8220;You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray…” phony quote has been traced back to a left-wing blogger using the handle &#8220;Cobra,&#8221; who began seeding the quote on left-wing blogs beginning in 2005. The quote has also been linked to an activist with the Communist Party-USA. </p>
<p>and =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-</p>
<p>For those of you have been watching the sad descent of LGF Blogger Charles &#8220;Nancy&#8221; Johnson into deranged moonbattery, this latest comes as sweet irony. The guy who exposed the Dan Rather TANG Memos as forgeries, is now using the Dan Rather Defense on his own allegations. Nancy posted the phony/out-of-context Rush Limbaugh quotes. When someone pointed out that it at least one was fake, Nancy shrieked &#8220;The quote is disputed, but it has not been proven false.&#8221; This is exactly how Dan Rather defends the TANG memos to this very day. </p>
<p>you can put it ALL into one category of making history rather than lettig history happen. </p>
<p>the whole effort on fox is to control history, not let it happen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

