Fortunately, this blog has a pretty decent spam-blocker. So only a couple per week of the pesky little things escape its pincher grip to actually be deposited in the comments section.
They tend to rather resemble one another. But one that came through today had a certain extra je ne sais quoi:
Can you provide more information on this? So far the info in your post is awesome . In the mean while I think im gonna stick around and read about 2 of your posts.
I love the casualness of the “gonna”—nice touch, spambot!—as well as the odd specificity of the plan to read 2 posts, a precision negated by the wishy-washy qualifier “about.” Make up your mind, bot!
I thought I’d write a little post about spambots and how they use flattery as a technique to sucker us poor bloggers in. And then I realized that the whole thing had a familiar feel—and I discovered that yes, I’ve passed this way before. Back in my first months of blogging, I wrote a piece on the subject, and nothing much has changed, except the amount of time I have to give over to the task of weeding out the bots (fortunately, a lot less than it used to be). So rather than re-invent the wheel, here’s an only slightly edited version of the original:
For those of you who don’t know what spambots are, a spambot comment (or, to be technical, a UBS, an unsolicited bulk comment) is an automatically-generated message sent out to many blogs at a time and deposited, like little turdlike droppings, in the comments sections of blogs. Spambots masquerade as real people making real comments.
What is their purpose? To make money for somebody, in this case increasing Google rankings and/or persuading you to click on a link and thereby inflate the hit counter of a commercial blog, or a blog front, and maybe even order something (although that must be extra-rare).
The spambots are very friendly. Whoever designs the spambot programs know that we humans are suckers for praise. So the spambots give out a sentence or two that sounds enthusiastic and is apparently music to the ears of many a lonely blogger who’s been waiting in vain to receive a comment or two: “You’ve got a great blog here! I’ve bookmarked it. Hope you visit mine, http://lawnmowers.blogspot.com. It’s all about lawnmowers and other cool stuff like that.”
I once clicked on one of these spambot sites out of curiosity, despite knowing that the comment was spam and would probably lead me to a dummy site and make money for the spambot designers (my lips are sealed as to the URL of the site, but let’s just say the blog had something to do with recipes for a certain dessert). It consisted of two posts—that was the whole blog—each with a short list of recipes.
But that blog had a very active comments section. There were over fifty on one of the posts, as I recall. So it was clear that the spambot had achieved its aim of getting a fair number of people to the site (note how I’m anthropomorphizing the spambot; it’s hard not to do so, they seem so pesky and duplicitous). Quite a few of the commenters on the spam blog, however, were not pleased; they posted little messages on the order of “You effing a-hole spambot, get off my blog and never come back”
But a large number of the commenters seemed touchingly grateful. They said things like, “So glad you liked my blog! Come back soon. Thanks for the recipes.”
At first I thought these might be second-generation counter-spambots, like in some sci-fi movie, evolving to make war on the original spambots and kill them with kindness. But no, they seemed to be real people with real blogs, seduced by flattery into thinking that finally, finally, they’d found a grateful and appreciative reader in the spambot, which of course they took to be a real person.
I’m not meaning to mock these people. I well remember the times when I was getting a grand total of five readers a day on this blog—and three of them were me, because I didn’t know how to block my own IP address; and the other two had reached here in error. So I know what it’s like to plod away in isolation and hope to be discovered. But I like to think that even in those days a spambot wouldn’t have fooled me.

November 9th, 2009 at 8:43 pm
Hell, I’ve been sticking around all day and refresh the screen every 15 seconds to read just one Neo post…. and when it finally comes it’s this?
November 9th, 2009 at 8:59 pm
vanderleun: Oy, what a day I had today!
November 9th, 2009 at 10:47 pm
I had a crappy day too:
My vascular surgeon found another superficial (not life threatening) clot in my calf = three more months of compression hose.
My boss’ elderly mother called and made him cry, which in gang-bang cublicle land we could all enjoy.
My other boss and a former colleague stopped by to tell me that I am a fool, and am letting down my family, by staying on my defense project and not diving for cover in a government job as they did.
My wife is sick to her stomach and has a fever.
The good side? The poodle did a great job cleaning up the dinner that the 3yo spilled on the floor.
The day would’ve been sunk if not for that toy poodle….
November 10th, 2009 at 1:24 am
But it’s always a sunshiny day for the spambots.
November 10th, 2009 at 9:52 am
Nice blog you got here.
Be a shame if, you know, something were to… you know… like… happen to it.
Real, real sad.
You should click this link.
You really should. A shame…. Ya know?
November 10th, 2009 at 10:39 am
Hey Guido, >waves hand
November 10th, 2009 at 10:40 am
Hey Guido, waves hand this is not the blog you’re looking for. Move along. Move along.
November 10th, 2009 at 12:26 pm
Hi! This was a really great post! I really learned a lot! You should check out my blog at http://neoneocon.com/ I think that you would really enjoy it!
November 10th, 2009 at 4:52 pm
Whoever designs the spambot programs know that we humans are suckers for praise.
That’s just like Obama. Have you hit upon the True Blue secret, Neo?
November 10th, 2009 at 6:54 pm
Ah Neo, don’t knock five readers a day. That’s about what my blog gets, and they’re mostly people who love me. I actually got some spambot stuff that linked to rather nasty blogs, so I enabled comment moderation. I’m sure that’s more effort than you want to make, but it works for me.
November 10th, 2009 at 7:02 pm
marine’s mom: yes, but remember—back then, three of those five readers of my blog were me!
I have other ways of dealing with spam now, fortunately.
November 11th, 2009 at 5:36 am
[...] did a wonderful post about Spam-Bots and being seduced by silico-flattery. In it she touched on some things I have been [...]
October 25th, 2010 at 3:12 am
spam blockers are always needed these days because of the growing number of spammers online*;: