<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lindsey Graham gives Eric Holder a lesson in the law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:40:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marine's mom</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134773</link>
		<dc:creator>marine's mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134773</guid>
		<description>It seemed as if Holder didn&#039;t understand the ramifications of the realities that Graham was outlining. Scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seemed as if Holder didn&#8217;t understand the ramifications of the realities that Graham was outlining. Scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huxley</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134518</link>
		<dc:creator>huxley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134518</guid>
		<description>Browsing around in the hacked files, I get the impression that most of the material is genuine. It would be way too much trouble to create these many megabytes of emails plus all the data and code from scratch.

The only two possibilities I can see:

(1) All of the material is true in which case all hell breaks loose for global warming advocates, including Barack Obama.

(2) Most of it is true, but someone has lightly salted some of the documents with incriminating material, which is going to be a mess to sort out and a black eye for global warming skeptics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Browsing around in the hacked files, I get the impression that most of the material is genuine. It would be way too much trouble to create these many megabytes of emails plus all the data and code from scratch.</p>
<p>The only two possibilities I can see:</p>
<p>(1) All of the material is true in which case all hell breaks loose for global warming advocates, including Barack Obama.</p>
<p>(2) Most of it is true, but someone has lightly salted some of the documents with incriminating material, which is going to be a mess to sort out and a black eye for global warming skeptics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huxley</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134513</link>
		<dc:creator>huxley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134513</guid>
		<description>Blockbuster story breaking on global warming.

The Hadley Climate Research Unit has been hacked. 61 meg of emails and data have been released, and some of the emails are damning indeed. If true, these climate scientists have been exposed in an ongoing conspiracy of scientific fraud.

I saw this story yesterday when it started to break but wanted to let it simmer longer. However, the Hadley director says that the emails are genuine, admits that a hacker did the damage, and the Center has canceled all passwords.

This is huge. I&#039;ll be following the story further and looking at the files myself. It seems too good to be true and yet...

A couple links to get you started:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/19/breaking-news-story-hadley-cru-has-apparently-been-hacked-hundreds-of-files-released/
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/hadley_hacked/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blockbuster story breaking on global warming.</p>
<p>The Hadley Climate Research Unit has been hacked. 61 meg of emails and data have been released, and some of the emails are damning indeed. If true, these climate scientists have been exposed in an ongoing conspiracy of scientific fraud.</p>
<p>I saw this story yesterday when it started to break but wanted to let it simmer longer. However, the Hadley director says that the emails are genuine, admits that a hacker did the damage, and the Center has canceled all passwords.</p>
<p>This is huge. I&#8217;ll be following the story further and looking at the files myself. It seems too good to be true and yet&#8230;</p>
<p>A couple links to get you started:</p>
<p><a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/19/breaking-news-story-hadley-cru-has-apparently-been-hacked-hundreds-of-files-released/" rel="nofollow">http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/19/breaking-news-story-hadley-cru-has-apparently-been-hacked-hundreds-of-files-released/</a><br />
<a href="http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/hadley_hacked/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/hadley_hacked/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: br549</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134511</link>
		<dc:creator>br549</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134511</guid>
		<description>The real tragedy (or BS) in this and all the other problems with the Obama administration, his czars, appointees, etc. is glaring right at all of us in the bottom right hand corner of the videos you display.

It says you tube. It never says NBC, CBS, ABC, rarely says CNN or MSNBC, and never even says FOX enough. Were the videos concerning anyone in the W or Nixon administrations, well, we all know, you couldn&#039;t be anywhere without it being flashed in front of you.

The MSM is but a group not unlike the voters who placed him where he is. They will ride this thing all the way down. They &quot;have to&quot;. Obama may be about him, but they bought into him, and they are about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real tragedy (or BS) in this and all the other problems with the Obama administration, his czars, appointees, etc. is glaring right at all of us in the bottom right hand corner of the videos you display.</p>
<p>It says you tube. It never says NBC, CBS, ABC, rarely says CNN or MSNBC, and never even says FOX enough. Were the videos concerning anyone in the W or Nixon administrations, well, we all know, you couldn&#8217;t be anywhere without it being flashed in front of you.</p>
<p>The MSM is but a group not unlike the voters who placed him where he is. They will ride this thing all the way down. They &#8220;have to&#8221;. Obama may be about him, but they bought into him, and they are about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huxley</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134500</link>
		<dc:creator>huxley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134500</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;…. but what should we be looking at?&lt;/i&gt;

All of Obama&#039;s failures.

I don&#039;t know what will happen with the Senate healthcare bill, whether the Democrats can jam it through by year&#039;s end or (latest moved goalpost) by the State of the Union address.

However, if Obama and Reid fail to get healthcare, Obama really is a lame duck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>…. but what should we be looking at?</i></p>
<p>All of Obama&#8217;s failures.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what will happen with the Senate healthcare bill, whether the Democrats can jam it through by year&#8217;s end or (latest moved goalpost) by the State of the Union address.</p>
<p>However, if Obama and Reid fail to get healthcare, Obama really is a lame duck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon baker</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134495</link>
		<dc:creator>jon baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134495</guid>
		<description>mezzrow  says &quot;.... but what should we be looking at?”


The collapsing dollar....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mezzrow  says &#8220;&#8230;. but what should we be looking at?”</p>
<p>The collapsing dollar&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huxley</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134492</link>
		<dc:creator>huxley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134492</guid>
		<description>expat: That sounds about right to me. 

However, many on this blog credit Obama with much more competence than that. Outside his prowess within academia and Democratic campaigns, I&#039;m just not seeing competence.

I&#039;m worried about the damage that Obama will do when his failures become undeniable, the fantasy implodes, and he starts thrashing around trying to get his mojo back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>expat: That sounds about right to me. </p>
<p>However, many on this blog credit Obama with much more competence than that. Outside his prowess within academia and Democratic campaigns, I&#8217;m just not seeing competence.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m worried about the damage that Obama will do when his failures become undeniable, the fantasy implodes, and he starts thrashing around trying to get his mojo back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidt</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134491</link>
		<dc:creator>davidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134491</guid>
		<description>mezzrow asks, &quot;So then, what is this circus distracting us from? We’re staring at the shiny object, but what should we be looking at?&quot;

Obama isn&#039;t closing Gitmo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mezzrow asks, &#8220;So then, what is this circus distracting us from? We’re staring at the shiny object, but what should we be looking at?&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama isn&#8217;t closing Gitmo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoffrey Britain</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134486</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoffrey Britain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134486</guid>
		<description>This.is.not.a.&lt;i&gt;legal&lt;/i&gt;.decision. It&#039;s.an.&lt;i&gt;ideological/political&lt;/i&gt;.decision.

Ideological/political decisions do not need to be defended because they&#039;re based upon an unprovable ideological premise, they merely need to be implemented.

This was not Holder&#039;s decision, it was Obama&#039;s. Holder is merely Obama&#039;s water carrier.

Everything Obama and Holder say about this issue is simply smoke and mirrors.

The political price the democrats will pay for this decision will be severe. 

They&#039;re blind to the future price they will pay and the nature of the &#039;two-edged sword&#039; they wield because their ideological premises are in denial as to the very nature of the threat to the west that radical Islamic terrorism represents. 

It shall come as a great shock to them when the bill comes due.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This.is.not.a.<i>legal</i>.decision. It&#8217;s.an.<i>ideological/political</i>.decision.</p>
<p>Ideological/political decisions do not need to be defended because they&#8217;re based upon an unprovable ideological premise, they merely need to be implemented.</p>
<p>This was not Holder&#8217;s decision, it was Obama&#8217;s. Holder is merely Obama&#8217;s water carrier.</p>
<p>Everything Obama and Holder say about this issue is simply smoke and mirrors.</p>
<p>The political price the democrats will pay for this decision will be severe. </p>
<p>They&#8217;re blind to the future price they will pay and the nature of the &#8216;two-edged sword&#8217; they wield because their ideological premises are in denial as to the very nature of the threat to the west that radical Islamic terrorism represents. </p>
<p>It shall come as a great shock to them when the bill comes due.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: expat</title>
		<link>http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134485</link>
		<dc:creator>expat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/11/19/lindsey-graham-gives-eric-holder-a-law-lesson/#comment-134485</guid>
		<description>huxley: I don&#039;t think that thinking things through is an Obama strong point. His method is: 1) Make a promise that sounds good, 2) Give an order to his staff, 3) Throw staff member 1 under the bus and appoint staff member 2, and 4) when failure becomes apparent, blame Bush. It&#039;s Obama&#039;s automatic pilot mode and it leaves him lots of time to admire himself in the mirror.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huxley: I don&#8217;t think that thinking things through is an Obama strong point. His method is: 1) Make a promise that sounds good, 2) Give an order to his staff, 3) Throw staff member 1 under the bus and appoint staff member 2, and 4) when failure becomes apparent, blame Bush. It&#8217;s Obama&#8217;s automatic pilot mode and it leaves him lots of time to admire himself in the mirror.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

