=================================
After Coakley’s defeat, Obama pretended that the real cause was a generalized anger and frustration “not just because of what’s happened in the last year or two years, but what’s happened over the last eight years.”
Let’s get this straight:
The antipathy to George W. Bush is so enduring and powerful that . . .
it just elected a Republican senator in Massachusetts?
=================================

ROTLMAO.

The gerble’s running full tilt but the wheel’s off the spindle.

.

I see that they just had senate votes on the debt limit, and all 60 democrats voted to raise it.

That implies that Paul Kirk (Massachusetts) voted with them.

WHAT THE HELL IS DOING STILL VOTING?!!!.

I understood that his term ENDED when the special election was over.

-

You mean like

We could all vote no and still not stop legislation

or

We could all go home and Harry and Nancy would still be able field a quorum.

The Senate can’t get a cloture vote since Brown was elected (but I’ll note that he’s still not seated and sworn in…talk about obstructionism!)

the reason thy are saying that its the republicans is that if any of the republicans were progressive enough to do what the progressives want, then they could end aroudn the dems who are not progressive.

like feminism being an umbrella over others using the power of the contradictory groups (which is impossible in true representation)

like the catholic church being seen as a country with no boarders on another axis with real countries. a nation pattern that overlays the physical nation pattern.

the progressives are a meta party
and so are the one party above the parties that presume to be able to sum up the power the way these other ones can do.

its quite clever, but if you dont see the others doing this you cant see them doing this.

in this way, they play both ends against the middle (us).

doesnt matter what kind of thing you want, its always under feminism (for porno, against porno, for marraige, against marriage, for abortion against abortion) dont matter.

doesnt matter what kind of thing you want, its always under progressivism/socialism/communism (for big state, against big state, republican or democrat, for abortion against abortion) dont matter.

of course if they label it diferent and such, we are too stupid to see it. just watch the discussino if any.

Astroturfer. Do Democrats astroturf? I really really didn’t know that. In all my reading of the Washington Pravda and the Communist News Network, I had only heard of Republicans doing that. What is this world comming to?

You mean that all those emails I get from Obama.org telling me to get out there and call my congressman and tell them “XXX”. Is that Astroturfing. Who knew. I guess Astroturfing is good. The One does it.

I want the parties to oppose each other. This is one way to stop them from doing stupid things.

“Government is the problem,” said President Reagan.

I don’t want government to get things done. Every time government gets things done, disaster follows. (See the subprime mortgage fiasco.)

The best government is divided government. Let’s hope the Republicans win the Senate or the House next fall. This might be the best way to keep Obama from doing anything at all.

I suppose in 2011 and 2012 he could whine about the Party of No.

” The Republicans are the Party of No for a good reason.

When the six-year-old boy ties a cape around his neck and wants to jump off the roof of the garage because he thinks he can fly like Superman … his parents say “No!”

When the eleven-year-old girl wants to get a permanent tattoo of some vampire from Twilight … her parents say “No!”

When the kids come home from an evening of trick-or-treating and want to eat their entire haul of candy in one sitting … their parents say “No!”

The Republicans are the Party of No because they are the Party of Adult Supervision.“