Obama’s version of sanctions on Iran comes with a huge asterisk.
[NOTE: The title of this post is a riff on this.]
This entry was posted
on Friday, April 30th, 2010 at 12:19 pm and is filed under Iran.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Previously a lifelong Democrat, born in New York and living in New England, surrounded by liberals on all sides, I've found myself slowly but surely 
April 30th, 2010 at 12:48 pm
I am amazed the Mullahs can stand the tension, knowing that Obama is after them. After all didn’t you point out that Tom Friedman made clear that the Messiah is not a man to be toyed with?
He is indeed inspiring. Can you imagine in Churchill’s place?
April 30th, 2010 at 1:40 pm
As I read the proposal, countries that Obama defines as cooperating with us are excused from cooperating with us. What am I missing?
April 30th, 2010 at 2:53 pm
This supports the perception that NObama considers Rush and Glenn Beck as greater enemies than the Mullahs.
The longer he is in office, the greater the probability that someone explodes a nuclear bomb somewhere- as shown by such inane pronouncements. I just hope NObama leaves office before it happens. Hope and change, and all that.
April 30th, 2010 at 3:14 pm
Mr Frank,
I would say you are missing Logic 101, the Obama version, that is
April 30th, 2010 at 3:52 pm
Ironic justice: Obama gets taken out by a terrorist nuclear bomb.
April 30th, 2010 at 4:28 pm
Curtis, Obama taken out by a terrorist nuke, not likely. One Iranian already made it clear they want Obama in power, and they are quite close to Al-Qaeda now. When a terrorist nuke, read Iranian nuke delivered to the US by Iranian agents claiming to be Al-Qaeda, does hit the US you can be sure that of 300,000,000 Americans only one will be on a do not kill list, our esteemed leader.
Also in my comment above, the first one, I meant to write “Imagine if Obama were Prime Minister of Britain after Dunkirk instead of Churchill?” He probably would give a speech along these lines “You will fight for me on the beaches, you will fight for me in the skies, you will fight for me in the streets, you will never surrender me…and if this island is subdued I will go overseas where you may relax knowing that I am safe”
May 1st, 2010 at 4:53 am
More accurately will be
“Obama: making the world safe for theocracy, Iran’s Mullahs style”
US imposed exporting Iraqi oil after 1991, US had warships and navy that installed and started in after 1991 sanction against Iraq to search and checks the oil and other ships smuggled Iraqi oil.
Bush in one of his speeches gave Iran weeks not months to comply with UN demands, Bush left WH without any serious actions against Mullahs.
Obama started and with all the fuss about Iran he did not really done any things that really threaten the Mullahs.
In fact US opened the doors for Mullah in Iraq to gain more money by investing and wining many projects also the export sky rocketing from 2003 till now with Iraq made the financial arm of Mullahs stronger.
May 1st, 2010 at 5:51 pm
> Has the White House forgotten that the entire point of the exercise is to force Iran to stop building nuclear weapons? Or has the Obama administration decided to just concern themselves with political game-playing, fiddling furiously while Tehran glows?
Three words continue to *exactly* explain Obama’s actions:
Cloward-Piven Strategy
.
At what point to we decide that the thing which looks, smells and sounds like a horse is, in actual fact, a friggin’ horse?