Comments on: Sarah Jessica Parker’s shoes: the sequel http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:55:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Artfldgr http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166661 Artfldgr Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:13:09 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166661 Women thing men and women are the same, but in truth, men dont have transformational relationships with their underwear or clothing in general. :) Women thing men and women are the same, but in truth, men dont have transformational relationships with their underwear or clothing in general. :)

]]> By: Daniel in Brookline http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166375 Daniel in Brookline Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:46:18 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166375 The Daniel, he is right... As a happily-married straight man with five kids, I'll confess to being a little fuzzy on the subject of 'statement shoes' or 'statement dresses' (or using the word 'statement' as an adjective in the first place, I might add). Is this supposed to be analogous to Patrick Swayze's "<a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2224473166" rel="nofollow">say something hat</a>"? respectfully, Daniel in Brookline The Daniel, he is right…

As a happily-married straight man with five kids, I’ll confess to being a little fuzzy on the subject of ‘statement shoes’ or ‘statement dresses’ (or using the word ‘statement’ as an adjective in the first place, I might add). Is this supposed to be analogous to Patrick Swayze’s “say something hat“?

respectfully,
Daniel in Brookline

]]> By: Daniel http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166356 Daniel Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:25:58 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166356 ...and the straight male says, "Huh? What shoes." …and the straight male says,

“Huh? What shoes.”

]]> By: njartist49 http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166355 njartist49 Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:24:52 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166355 <i>I may have taken some wrong turnings in my life, but I am proud and relieved to say that I have never committed the faux pas of mixing statement shoes with statement dresses.</i> Ah, yeah; in the Age of Twitter, one does not speak in paragraphs. I may have taken some wrong turnings in my life, but I am proud and relieved to say that I have never committed the faux pas of mixing statement shoes with statement dresses.

Ah, yeah; in the Age of Twitter, one does not speak in paragraphs.

]]> By: Richard Cook http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166354 Richard Cook Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:11:05 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166354 She looks like one of those jingle trucks we always encountered in Afghanistan. Think she might be deep cover Taliban? She looks like one of those jingle trucks we always encountered in Afghanistan. Think she might be deep cover Taliban?

]]> By: FenelonSpoke http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166338 FenelonSpoke Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:24:26 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166338 I don't think I've seen a more ridiculous pair of shoes in my life. I don’t think I’ve seen a more ridiculous pair of shoes in my life.

]]> By: betsybounds http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166308 betsybounds Fri, 18 Jun 2010 04:01:52 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166308 rickl, Not only that you are turning, but that you have turned--into the turningness of the metrosexualness of the womens. The Manolo has spoken, and it shall be so. rickl, Not only that you are turning, but that you have turned–into the turningness of the metrosexualness of the womens. The Manolo has spoken, and it shall be so.

]]> By: rickl http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166307 rickl Fri, 18 Jun 2010 03:57:19 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166307 I could care less about Sarah Jessica Parker's shoes or dress, but this: <blockquote cite=""> More simply put, you cannot mix statement shoes with statement dresses.</blockquote> ...actually makes sense to me. Does that mean I'm turning metrosexual? I could care less about Sarah Jessica Parker’s shoes or dress, but this:

More simply put, you cannot mix statement shoes with statement dresses.

…actually makes sense to me.

Does that mean I’m turning metrosexual?

]]> By: Tatyana http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166277 Tatyana Fri, 18 Jun 2010 02:18:36 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166277 vanderleun: I have a Russian accent, not Manolian! vanderleun: I have a Russian accent, not Manolian!

]]> By: vanderleun http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166271 vanderleun Fri, 18 Jun 2010 02:01:54 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/2010/06/17/sarah-jessica-parkers-shoes-the-sequel/#comment-166271 "Of the course, you and the Manolo - you are in cahoots!" No, no, no... Say rather: Of the course, the you and the Manolo - in the cahoots you are! “Of the course, you and the Manolo – you are in cahoots!”

No, no, no…

Say rather: Of the course, the you and the Manolo – in the cahoots you are!

]]>