Just a couple of days ago I wrote a post defending the looks of the PT Cruiser against those who dare call it ugly.
And now I read that Chrysler is ending production of the cute little guy, once so popular there were waiting lists to buy one. But after this Friday no more will be manufactured, and the PT will go down the road so many cars have traveled before it to oblivion.
Hey, Chrysler, did it have something to do with my post?
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, July 7th, 2010 at 2:28 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Previously a lifelong Democrat, born in New York and living in New England, surrounded by liberals on all sides, I've found myself slowly but surely 
July 7th, 2010 at 3:40 pm
I told you it was a car for wimps and gurlz. But did you listen? Noooooo…….
July 7th, 2010 at 3:52 pm
Funny how sometimes attention makes a subject appear in all your areas of occupation. At one intersection, I noticed three PT cruisers. They hadn’t been there before. And just recently, an accident involving a PT cruiser.
I think if we all concentrated real hard we could get one to appear in Charlie Sheen’s driveway, which might solve his car-getting-stolen-and-being-dumped-down-a-mountainside-problem.
More importantly, Beyonce is looking better.
July 7th, 2010 at 5:56 pm
They didn’t name it Part Time Cruiser for nothin.
July 7th, 2010 at 6:18 pm
It had a good run for a vehicle that was based on the Neon but fetched a much higher price than its more pedestrian sedan-shaped sibling.
BTW Neo, whatever happened with your search for a comfortable car?
July 7th, 2010 at 7:20 pm
Yeah, I noticed a whole bunch of them on the way home from work today. I probably wouldn’t have paid much attention if I hadn’t heard the news.
July 7th, 2010 at 8:40 pm
Don’t blame yourself, Neo;-). Lead-times in the auto industry tend to be measured in years, so Chrysler obviously made the decision some time ago to stop PT Cruiser production. Pity it didn’t have the performance or reliability to go with its looks, which I always found to be easy on the eyes.
July 7th, 2010 at 9:22 pm
I’m still able to proudly state: No piercings, no tattoos, and I don’t drive a PT Cruiser…
July 7th, 2010 at 9:25 pm
“Hey, Chrysler, did it have something to do with my post?”
Let’s test the hypothesis — say something nice about the Chevy Corvette.
July 7th, 2010 at 10:27 pm
And it got designer Bryan Nesbitt a higher-profile gig at General Motors, too. (If the Chevy HHR looks rather PT-ish, now you know why.)
July 7th, 2010 at 11:51 pm
My wife likes how it looks too but a woman who has one told me it’s not well made. I’ve heard it was designed out of Geo parts. You don’t see many of those on the road these days, even used ones.
July 8th, 2010 at 9:12 am
You do understand that the PT Cruiser was simply the Dodge Neon as a station wagon, don’t you? Same chassis, same parts stream, all identical.
You have to remember that they’re in the business of selling something new.
July 8th, 2010 at 9:39 am
I kind of liked it. Looked like cars did when I was very small. My grandfather had a 36 Dodge that had to last through the war years. PT reminded me of that. If it blew a tire, or overheated a couple of times whenever you tried to take a 200 mile trip it would be perfect. It was really fun on a July trip crammed in the back with brother and a well padded great-Aunt or two.
Sometime just before or very early in WWII my Mother and Dad took the train to Detroit and picked up two Pontiac sedans for a dealer friend. They were the first of the “streamlined” look and Mom drove one with two tone paint. Allegedly the first ever in Florida. She said people all along the way just went crazy when they saw it. She was Queen of the Road, and loved it.
July 9th, 2010 at 1:17 am
[...] I were rich, I’d get extra Cruisers as parts [...]
July 9th, 2010 at 1:47 am
I never really cared much for the “retro” cars. It just seems like automobile stylists run out of ideas from time to time and have to go back to the well. That Chevy thing was the worst example. If I get the bug to drive a car that looks like a 34 Ford or a 50 Chevy pickup I’ll buy or build one.
July 9th, 2010 at 5:19 am
The PT Cruiser was cute. That’s not a compliment unless you are two years old.
July 10th, 2010 at 11:03 am
It does have issues when the odometer gets around 125K and up. The electrical system circuit for the radiator fan motor has major issues. I have the burn scars on my left arm to prove it.
After a radiator/hoses/thermostat R and R, it was a direct wiring to the battery via a toggle switch. I live in the Mojave Desert. The fan needs to be on, ALL THE TIME.
Not Chrysler’s best engineering at all. Cute is all. The Missus went back to work to buy it ten years ago. It soldiers on as I was in and out of work for a couple of years. Now working. Civil Service.
July 10th, 2010 at 1:17 pm
And here’s the PT’s Swan song.