Home » Borges on books and change

Comments

Borges on books and change — 16 Comments

  1. I admit to a love of libraries myself.

    The internet may be the future with libraries becoming obsolete, but in my mind nothing really compares with an actual, physical book.

    Interestingly enough, the book that I guess most fascinated me growing up was a very, very old family bible my grandmother had.

    If I remember it correctly, it was probably from the mid-1800’s perhaps, it had both the old and new testaments, as well as apocrypha, family births/deaths, and a very thick leather cover that had been tooled or something.

    The most fascinating thing were the numerous illustrations inside. I think they may have been by Dore or some similar illustrator?

    Not saying I took every lesson intended by the contents to heart (!), but it was a fascinating book for a 10 or 12 year old to be looking through.

  2. I read Borges in college and loved his short stories, many of which have themes similar to this. I do wonder if his engaging writing makes him more persuasive than he deserves, though. We tend to read comments like this as if he is saying there is an ongoing deepening and modification of meaning. But he often goes well beyond that into suggesting that meaning is forever unstable, with previous understandings destroyed or invalid.

  3. Thank you for that wonderful Borges’ excerpt!

    (I do not really know Borges, having only recently read his short story “The Immortal”.)

    But isn’t it amazing how thinking — a lightening bolt of consciousness — can speak so personally to nameless others, far removed in time, space, and culture?

    The best that has been thought and said is in the public domain, available to all, and yet we are admonished to “Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many.” Who would have thought that the divine spoke in the resigned voice of worldly wisdom?

    Life is problematic — yes — why do we not partake of all this goodness?

  4. I’m reading ‘Ficciones’ in an effort to advance my Spanish. I think I’d rather be reading Don Colacho’s Aphorisms…in English.

  5. Books delight us, when prosperity smiles upon us; they comfort us inseparably when stormy fortune frowns on us. They lend validity to human compacts, and no serious judgments are propounded without their help. Arts and sciences, all the advantages of which no mind can enumerate, consist in books. How highly must we estimate the wondrous power of books, since through them we survey the utmost bounds of the world and time, and contemplate the things that are as well as those that are not, as it were in the mirror of eternity. In books we climb mountains and scan the deepest gulfs of the abyss; in books we behold the finny tribes that may not exist outside their native waters, distinguish the properties of streams and springs and of various lands; from books we dig out gems and metals and the materials of every kind of mineral, and learn the virtues of herbs and trees and plants, and survey at will the whole progeny of Neptune, Ceres, and Pluto.

    Pichard de Bury, Philobiblon, Ch, XV.

  6. My first non-adapted, “adult” book was “20 Thousand Miles Under Sea” by Jule Verne in Russian translation. It was printed in 1890, in old leather cover, and beatifully illustrated by estampes, probably, reprinted from original French edition. I remember how I read it aloud in kindergarten, surrounded by other boys and girls, who listen to my reading with a great interest. Our nurses were happy that they did not need to watch children playing while I read; I was 6 years old and earned a nickname “snotty professor” because of my chronic running nose and didactic tone, picked up from my mother, an English teacher. I do not remember anything from this book now except illustrations.

  7. I wonder if Terry Pratchett, creator of the Discworld stories read that essay a long time ago.
    He had a lot of fun with the library at Unseen University, where wizards are educated.
    Among other things he wrote that magical books cannot be filed by subject. Their contents, the spells, are so powerful that shelving them together would result in a Critical Black Mass.
    He also wrote that books were a state of matter which existed seperately from liquid, solid, or gas. They exerted an influence on the shape of space and time so that every library that ever exist was linked to every other.

  8. One thing leads to another, as Charlie Brown (I believe) once said in Peanuts: “The cosmic implications are staggering…”

  9. The great thing about great books is that they can be read over and over, and each time they yield new insights. They seem to change to educate each reader, no matter where he or she is in life. I just learned that Walker Percy, the novelist, read Brothers Karamazov six times.

    May I ask what everyone is re-reading?

  10. I found it best to have a wide ranging reading habit: one never knows when an idea or statement found in an out of the way book may resolve a problem in an unrelated field. Picasso once responded to a question regarding what should an artist do when he cannot do art: he respondedIntellect; in the same book, I found a short quote from Aristotle on from: every thing snapped together in a instant.

  11. Glitch in loading. Should have read:

    I found it best to have a wide ranging reading habit: one never knows when an idea or statement found in an out of the way book may resolve a problem in an unrelated field. Picasso once responded to a question regarding what should an artist do when he cannot do art: he respondedIntellect; in the same book, I found a short quote from Aristotle on from: every thing snapped together in a instant.

  12. Glitch in loading. Should have read:

    I found it best to have a wide ranging reading habit: one never knows when an idea or statement found in an out of the way book may resolve a problem in an unrelated field. Picasso once responded to a question regarding what should an artist do when he cannot do art: he responded “Read.”

    As an artist, the master artist I honed myself against was Cezanne; not only did I seek to understand what he was doing without replicating him; I also sought to understand his comment “Art is intellect.” I saw this as the golden key. After nearly twenty years, I found the answer in Mortimer Adler’s book Intellect; in the same book, I found a short quote from Aristotle on from: every thing snapped together in a instant.

  13. Pingback:TIE Institute

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>