Yesterday I attended the first day of a conference in Boston held by CAMERA, the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (see this for the list of speakers).
The usual crew of anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian demonstrators was there, bright and early, to greet the attendees as we arrived at 9:00 AM. Hoarsely shouting in a sing-song chant, and beating a rhythmic drum, they stood with unfurled banner as they serenaded us in the bright and chilly Sunday morning air.
Attendance was enormous, and security tight and visible. The theme? Truth is powerful—if you can get it out above the din of false information that is constantly generated and disseminated about Israel.
Alan Dershowitz began by stating another theme of the day, which is that criticism of Israel often features a double standard. The country is customarily judged by far stricter rules than apply to any other nation. He told the following story (about Jews in general rather than Israel itself) illustrating the way it works:
President Lowell of Harvard was going on about how bad Jews are and how their presence was not welcome at the university because, after all, “Jews cheat.” Judge Learned Hand, to whom he was speaking, pointed out that non-Jews cheat, as well. Lowell replied, “Quit changing the subject; we’re talking about Jews now!”
And so the world does—on and on and on.
A highlight of the conference for me was the appearance of Philippe Karsenty, the Frenchman who successfully defended himself against the charge of libel for helping to expose the lies of France2 and well-known French reporter Charles Enderlin in perpetrating the al Durah hoax. Four years ago I went to France to report on a related trial, and met and spoke with the intrepid Karsenty there (see this for some of my posts on the subject).
Karsenty is a charming and elegant speaker (the accent doesn’t hurt, either), but also a clear and incisive one. He is one of France’s modern-day Dreyfuses—a man on a mission, and with the heart to stick with it. One of the new developments he revealed is that Enderlin is still defending himself, having just written and released a book called (in French) “A Child Is Dead.”
Other highlights of the CAMERA conference were the remarks by Anne Bayevsky, who detailed the sorry record of the UN as well as its Orwellian Human Rights Council; Gerald Steinberg on the anti-Israel slant of NGOs such as Human Rights Watch, and how their “witnesses” are accepted as unbiased by the press; and Melanie Phillips, who spoke blisteringly of hardened anti-Israel attitudes in Britain and the general decline of Britain itself.
During the speeches and question-and-answer periods, I was struck by the descriptions of the depth and breadth of the deceptive demonization of Israel—not just in the Arab and Muslim world, where it has found an especially receptive home and eager practitioners, but in the press, academia, and among the international “peacemakers,” the NGOs, and many churches.
CAMERA has its work cut out for it.
Previously a lifelong Democrat, born in New York and living in New England, surrounded by liberals on all sides, I've found myself slowly but surely 
October 11th, 2010 at 3:51 pm
1. The truth always wins in a way. It has solidity. It is a ‘something’. The lie is not real in the same way. It can never really last. It can, however, do enormous damage and inflict incredible pain and suffering. Jews know have known this since Moses.
2. I think it is true that God blesses those who bless Israel, and curses those who curse it. I mean that in a metaphorical, but real sense. History basically proves it. Where are the Hittites? Babylonians? or Nazis for that matter? Where will be Hamas and Hezbollah, long term? We know the answer.
October 11th, 2010 at 4:06 pm
Stay skeptic, be critical and fair … praise and condemn with a razors edge.
October 11th, 2010 at 4:10 pm
I especially enjoyed Dershowitz’s defense of Israel during the recent “raid” by Israeli commandos on the ship carrying “humanitarian cargo” to Gaza. He succinctly explained why the raid was perfectly legal under established international law. Yet Dershowitz is hardly a shill for Israel, as he criticizes them politically on a fairly frequent basis>
October 11th, 2010 at 4:20 pm
Today Israel is a different people, multi-ethnic, pluralistic of conscious, Democratic, an ally. But within this nation are those who steal and support the stealing of Palestinian lands, just as there are those Palestinians, and Jihadist, who terrorize Israel, these slivers should be condemned.
But I cant help commenting on Mikes post, Moses …. the guy who omitted genocide from the 10 Commandments, more convenient for the slaughter of the Amalekites, and thus historical example, warrant, and justification for genocides to come.
Stay skeptic, be critical and fair … praise and condemn with a razors edge. That’s better.
October 11th, 2010 at 4:32 pm
Nyo – razor’s edge. And that would be why even broad distinctions are not understandable to you?
To even drop in the settlement question, calling it “stealing Palestinian’s land,” is to at best strain at a gnat while swallowing a camel. At worst, it is refusing to even consider the other side of the story.
Stop congratulating yourself, please.
October 11th, 2010 at 6:08 pm
The rise of racism and anti-Semitism in the last two years is indeed alarming. I believe this is occurring because the enemies of Israel and Jews everywhere are picking up on the ambiguities coming out of Washington. Just saw that more boats with activists are on their way. We all know what this exercise is about. The old game of push the cops, until something bad goes down, and then scream bloody murder. Two more years?, I hope it goes by quickly, Iran doesn’t get it’s device built, and we get someone in office who will deal with the devil in a serious manner.
October 11th, 2010 at 6:09 pm
I know there are a lot of Non religious folks on this site that I enjoy reading their comments, but you should know this growing anti-Israel thing is not suprising to a lot Christians (or Jews). The eventual ganging up on Israel by the nations of the world and the execution of Christians who refuse to go along with a coming dictator have long been fortold.(The dictator is a wolf in sheeps clothing type, btw, who makes a treaty with Israel, only to break it) There is also a predicted “falling away” within the Christian Church that is predicted to happen before the worst persecution breaks out. That has already begun in ernest in Europe and America.
October 11th, 2010 at 6:17 pm
Assistant Village Idiot
hah?
October 11th, 2010 at 6:58 pm
thanks for getting the word out…I had not heard about this conference…Jennifer
October 11th, 2010 at 7:36 pm
jon baker,
and Jesus said that only the father knows the day, even Jesus said he did not know. and so, you prepare as if it is a thief in the night, not as if you can work out when to be ready. the major point made over and over is not to try to guess that time, but to live as if any time was such. (this is the part that many of the end times believers refuse to accept)
October 11th, 2010 at 8:31 pm
neo-neocon, did you happen to notice the Students for Justice in Palestine protesting? They’re busy slapping each other on the back for a job well done and I want to know if anyone actually noticed them or if (as usual) they are celebrating invented victories.
(I’m a BU student; I was going to volunteer, but I was sick this weekend. Horrible timing. I did see Melanie Phillips at Hillel on Friday, though, and I found her a compelling speaker. Again, the accent doesn’t hurt.)
October 11th, 2010 at 9:38 pm
Artfldgr:
Well put! That’s actually part of Jewish teaching too. (One of the Jewish sages used to like to say that you should offer your most heartfelt prayers to God on the day before you die. His students always asked him how one could possibly know that it was the day before your own death… and he’d answer, naturally, that you should therefore pray that way EVERY day.)
nyomythus: sometimes you have such good things to say. And then there are times like now.
Why on Earth would you bring up, out of left field, that Moses neglected to include “thou shalt not commit genocide” in the Ten Commandments? Has that anything to do with the topic of discussion? (For the record, authorship of the Ten Commandments is not attributed to Moses. And it does include the unambiguous “thou shalt not murder”… which to my mind is stronger than a hypothetical “thou shalt not commit genocide”. The Amalekites are a much larger topic for another day.)
And as for stolen Palestinian land… don’t even start. (a) The land on which Palestinian Arabs lived pre-1948 hardly ever belonged to them; absentee ownership was the general rule then. (b) The land acquired by Palestinian Jews (yes, they were called that pre-1948) was purchased, often at exorbitant prices, by private individuals and by the Jewish Agency (which would become part of the new Israeli government). (c) Land has indeed been taken by the State of Israel from Palestinians (as they have called themselves since 1962 or so), and from Israeli Arabs, and from Israeli Jews, in a process called “eminent domain”. Perhaps you’ve heard of it? The people on the receiving end of it usually don’t like it much, but it’s legal, and nearly every Western nation does it without comment.
For more information, read “Battleground” by Samuel Katz, or “From Time Immemorial” by Joan Peters.
You illustrate precisely the fruits of the slander against Israel that Neo’s conference attempts to address. “Land stolen from the Palestinians” is a myth; the fact that it’s a pervasive myth, and a commonly-accepted one, doesn’t make it true. Not only has Israel bent over backwards to help the Palestinians in any way it can; Israel is also the only country to have done so. (Only one country has ever made a determined effort to get Palestinians out of refugee camps. Only one Middle Eastern country routinely admits gay Palestinians, who are running for their lives from their own families. Only one country sends hundreds of truckloads of food, fuel, and medical supplies to the Palestinians, daily, during wartime. By now you can probably guess which country this is.)
The Arab-Israeli conflict is not symmetrical; it never has been. And from the very beginning, Israel has had to defend itself from the most ridiculous and outrageous accusations — accusations that are often more appropriate for the accusers than the accused.
And the rare transgressions Israel is genuinely guilty of — which are, without exception, violations of Israeli law, and are harshly punished as such — are as nothing compared to the daily standard practices of her enemies. Israel’s extremely high standards of morality are all the more remarkable, given the rough neighborhood in which she lives.
respectfully,
Daniel in Brookline
“I decline utterly to be impartial as between the fire brigade and the fire.” — Winston Churchill
October 11th, 2010 at 10:22 pm
This 2006 column by former NYC mayor Ed Koch on George W concludes as follows:
“In my judgment, when history evaluates George W. Bush’s position in the pantheon of presidents, he will be compared with Harry S. Truman. Bush’s fortitude in recognizing the danger of Islamic fundamentalism to the U.S. and, indeed, the Western world, and his awareness of the need to win this war of civilizations is remarkable. He deserves the applause of all Americans and in time he will receive it.”
A clear contrast with, and reminder of what we’ve lost, with the WH current occupant.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/08/bushs_fortitude_on_the_middle.html
October 11th, 2010 at 11:44 pm
Bryan: I described the demonstrators in the second paragraph of my post.
October 12th, 2010 at 1:52 am
“But within this nation are those who steal and support the stealing of Palestinian lands, just as there are those Palestinians, and Jihadist, who terrorize Israel, these slivers should be condemned.”
A little historical revisionism goes a long way for the proverbial “useful idiot” and hypocrite, ie. at the Temple Mount, the Ma’arat HaMachpela and Hebron; Judea and Samaria renamed Palestine, much later, for the benefit of the Jew haters; Israeli “apartheid” (where they vote, and big etc.) vs. arab/muslim “judenrein”, the genocide in ethnic cleansing, and where “even broad distinctions are not understandable…”
October 12th, 2010 at 2:09 am
As Daniel in Brookline points out, Jews living in pre-Israel statehood were called Palestinians. In fact, my mother and I came across some of my father’s old papers a couple of years ago..he’s been gone for over two decades now, but we had never seen this particular cache of material; in it, we found a passport.
My dad was a survivor of the camps, was liberated from Bergen Belsen in 1945. My grandparents were murdered in Auschwitz.
Dad apparently had thought to go to the Mideast after he was liberated, but was persuaded to come to the U.S. to study, by relief organizations, as he had some university training, and later became a successful microbiologist.
So Mom and I looked at this passport, In Hebrew, it said, “Eretz Yisroe”, State or Land of Israel.
In English, it said “Palestine”. It was issued in ’46 or ’47, prior to the independence of Israel in May ’48. So yes, my dad could have been a Palestinian! (He came to America in ’47).
As an aside, there is an excellent and well-researched book on the question of the conflict, with new findings of old documents only recently declassified and never available to researchers before, for anyone interested in the topic Palestine Betrayed by Ephraim Karsh.
October 12th, 2010 at 2:16 am
On another topic, an important one, Ace at Ace of Spades is organizing a “meatspace” GOTV effort.
http://minx.cc/?post=306755
The above links to his post on getting out the vote. He’s in NYC, plans to go to Boston as well, and is calling on his readers and fellow conservative bloggers to consider making calls and knocking on doors. The RNC and local Republican offices have lists of likely conservative voters, and the GOTV effort will focus on getting them to the polls (IOW, it’s not about confronting hostile lefties in their lairs).
October 12th, 2010 at 3:15 am
So, Nyomythus, where do you live? On land that wasn’t “stolen” from somebody else, I take it? Ah, of course! You live in Antarctica! I should have known.
October 12th, 2010 at 11:00 am
Mo: well put. My father-in-law has pointed out that he is as much a Palestinian, if not more, than Arafat ever was. (My father-in-law was born in Palestine in 1937; for the first eleven years of his life, his local government called him a “Palestinian Jew”. Yasser Arafat was born in Egypt, although he didn’t like advertising the fact.)
The late Menachem Begin had a way, when discussions turned to Palestinian rights, of reaching into a desk drawer and pulling out his Palestinian passport, granted to him by the British Mandate. He would say, “This says I’m a Palestinian. Does Mr. Arafat have one of these?”
The word “Palestinian”, like the word “ghetto”, does not mean today what it originally meant… and, in both cases, I don’t think the change was for the better.
respectfully,
Daniel in Brookline
October 12th, 2010 at 11:22 am
In fact, I should have pointed out: does anyone know the origins of the name “Palestine”?
It’s a corrupted version of the name given to the area by the Romans, back in 135 AD I believe, in an attempt to destroy any possible connection between the Jewish people and their ancient homeland. The Romans, as a deliberate finger in the eye, named the region “Syria Palaestina” after an age-old enemy of the Jewish people, the Philistines.
The name stuck to the area because nobody else really wanted it; it was a place to march through on your way from Africa to Europe and Asia. Even the Muslims didn’t care much for the place; after building some admittedly magnificent mosques, the place was left alone, with no one bothering even to change the name. Ditto for the Byzantines, the Crusaders, the Ottoman Turks, and finally the British. Only one group of people ever cared enough about the place to rebuild it and make a home out of it (yes, and give it its old name back); you know who that was.
If you’re interested in the condition of Palestine before Jewish immigration really got started there (circa 1880 or so), read what Mark Twain had to say about the place in “Innocents Abroad”. It makes for depressing reading, even from Twain; the place was a desolate wasteland. There’s a reason why the Second Aliyah, the wave of Jewish immigration from Russia after the (failed) coup attempt in 1907 — the ones who did the initial backbreaking work of rebuilding the land — are sometimes called “Aliyat ha-mitabdim” (the aliyah of suicides); it was pretty grim then.
Put briefly: nobody cared about Palestine until Jews rebuilt it into a land worth living in. Their success was great enough that it’s not surprising to see others wanting to share the results, if not the credit. (Jews had been rebuilding the land and making a modern state of it since 1880, as I said; the so-called Palestinian national movement, of people wanting a state of their own, began in 1962 with the formation of the PLO.)
respectfully,
Daniel in Brookline
October 12th, 2010 at 12:26 pm
“But within this nation are those who steal and support the stealing of Palestinian lands,”
It is a definitional impossibility for Jews to be stealing Palestinian lands.
Why? Because the Jews are the only true Palestinians. They are the indigenous people of Palestine.
As for the ones falsely claiming that name, they are Arabs. The Arabs are indigenous to the Arabian Peninsula. The only way Jews could be stealing land from them is if the Jews constructed settlements in the Arabian Peninsula.
Outside of the Arabian Peninsula, the Arabs themselves are beneficiaries of a land-grab. However, I’m not one to stoop to Helen Thomas’ level, so I don’t hold a grudge and I’m not going to call on all Arabs from Morocco to Iraq to go back home to Arabia. But, it does mean the Arabs have absolutely no cause to complain about dispossession in Palestine. Palestine is not and has never been theirs, and is and has always been the Jews’.
I am a Palestinian. Stop telling me my land isn’t mine. “The Palestinians among us” – Immanuel Kant, referring to the Jews in one of his writings.
October 12th, 2010 at 2:46 pm
Palestine may stretch back further, to Philistine. The etymology is disputed, but at minimum, the Philistines were one of the tribes that occupied the area.
I will add to Daniel and Mo’s comments the information that the absentee landlords were largely from Turkey and Jordan. The myth of generalised prosperity of the (current) Palestinians in the first half of the 20th C, though widely taught and widely believed, it not supported by evidence.
There are films by the British – news reports mostly – from those times. Try and get them shown in Palestine now. Or Britain either, for that matter.
October 12th, 2010 at 2:47 pm
Completely different angle.
I am not finding any record of organisations from the religious left being in attendance at CAMERA.
October 12th, 2010 at 8:15 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSQnfSfAsPM&feature=sub
Enjoy!
October 13th, 2010 at 4:43 am
Genocide as an ultimate measure of self-defence IS justified in my book. But only with unambiguos sanction from Almighty, and only when all other measures fail. Was nuking of Hiroshima an act of genocide? Yes. Was it justified? Yes.
October 13th, 2010 at 4:49 am
These were Amalekites who attempted genocide first, and for this crime they deserved a symmetrical response.
October 15th, 2010 at 7:39 am
Sergey,
Unambigous sanction from Almighty is easy to get, since every man can easily make up their own Almighty to justify whatever he likes. The days of prophecy are over. Nobody hears the voice of the Almighty any more. But lots of people think they do.
I therefor put it to you that your reasoning is absolute bollux.
And yes, Hiroshima was an act of genocide. No, genocide is never justified.
Hiroshima was necessary, not justified.
There is no justification ever to take another’s life. It is too often necessary but never justified.
October 15th, 2010 at 1:45 pm
Andrew Brehm: Genocide? Hardly. There was no attempt to eliminate the Japanese because they were Japanese. It was done to end the war. You are using the word way too loosely, although it is not unusual for it to be used that way. I first heard the term used in that manner back in college, when a friend said that the US was committing genocide in Vietnam. I argued about it with her then, and I would argue the same way now.
October 15th, 2010 at 7:49 pm
I did some lookup about the origins of the “Palestinians”. They arrived in and settled down in what is now Gaza. Around 800-ish or so CE. They were referred to as the sea-faring peoples. A (very) few inscriptions they left from that era seem to be of Mycenean Greek language. Or Cretan. Very likely they no longer exist as a separate ethnicity after the many waves of conquering and assimilating populations such as the Hittites, Assyrians, Arab Moslems, and Ottoman Moslems. The Romans did indeed resurrect this label to rename Sudea and Sumeria as some kind of insult to the Jews after the destruction of the 2nd Temple.
Please correct any errors I may have made.
October 17th, 2010 at 7:59 am
[...] summary of the CAMERA conference here included a powerful statement regarding the conference “Truth is powerful—if you can get [...]
October 18th, 2010 at 3:33 pm
pat laforce:
I believe you may be conflating two histories here. I’m not aware of “Palestinians” settling in Gaza in 800 CE, but I wouldn’t dispute it. (That was about the right time for Arab settlement in the area, after the wave of conquest under Muhammad and his successors in the mid-seventh century.)
However, I doubt very much that these were “sea-faring peoples”, or that they spoke Greek. The Philistines were indeed sea-faring, and were called that; and as such I wouldn’t be at all surprised if they had strong connections to Greece etc. But that was a different era entirely. (King David’s reign, when the Philistines were at their height — pun intended — is usually dated to approximately 1000 BCE.)
It is possible that some remnants of the earlier cultures were still hanging on in Gaza (originally a Philistine area) at the time of the Arab conquest; they would not have survived that conquest intact.
No, the people who today call themselves Palestinians have a relatively uncomplicated ancestry; they are Arabs, descended from the nomadic tribes of Arabia. They have no blood connection to the Philistines of old, just as there is no real connection anymore between the ancient Egyptian civilization and Egypt’s inhabitants today (who are likewise Arabs).
Of course, the Palestinians like to turn that on its head by claiming that there is no connection between modern-day Jews and biblical Jews. To that I have a very simple answer. My father-in-law and brother-in-law are Cohens (in Hebrew, “kohanim”), entitled to be called first to the Torah at any synagogue they attend. This is an honorific that is passed from father to son, and only from father to son; there is no other way to achieve that status.
In other words, my father-in-law is a direct descendant, through males only, of the Temple priests in the time of King David — and thus a direct descendant of Aaron, the brother of Moses.
So far as I know, the Palestinians have no remotely equivalent claim that they can make.
respectfully,
Daniel in Brookline