Whenever I get blue, and want a little pick me up, I visit GoFugYourself, and am almost never disappointed.
Today is no different. Feast your eyes on this:
It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s…it’s…it’s a cross between a a tutu and a corset and camouflage for lying in wait in a duck blind.
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, November 30th, 2010 at 2:56 pm and is filed under Fashion.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


November 30th, 2010 at 3:00 pm
It’s Nancy Pelosi’s lame (in both senses of the word) duck session costume.
November 30th, 2010 at 3:18 pm
I wonder whether she would run around with her head chopped off. The thought reawakens my feather phobia.
November 30th, 2010 at 3:24 pm
Brings new meaning to the word “chick.”
November 30th, 2010 at 3:44 pm
I wonder where the idea for that garment was hatched?
November 30th, 2010 at 3:48 pm
nice shoes!
November 30th, 2010 at 3:57 pm
Papagena!
November 30th, 2010 at 4:22 pm
Reminds me of the dress the singer Bjork wore to the Oscar ceremony a decade ago (I think):
http://www.fabsugar.com/Bjorks-Infamous-Swan-Dress-Love-Hate-144212
Steve Martin was hosting that year, and followed Bjork’s appearance (in her wacky dress) onstage. He paused, and the audience was just waiting for him to comment on the dress. He said, “I was going to wear MY swan….”
November 30th, 2010 at 4:22 pm
This is the doing of Howard the duck.
November 30th, 2010 at 4:40 pm
Okay, it looks a little drag queen-ish from behind. But she looks good from the front, when she’s posing and has some control over the angles.
November 30th, 2010 at 4:40 pm
Okay, it looks a little drag queen-ish from behind. But she looks good from the front, when she’s posing and has some control over the angles.
November 30th, 2010 at 4:43 pm
If you go to the site you can see the front.
Bob, At first I thought I liked the shoes until I saw the front.
She looks like she’d never drown – looking at the front
November 30th, 2010 at 4:51 pm
I saw the front and would definitely pluck her.
November 30th, 2010 at 5:10 pm
I’m with Steve. Slipping her out of that would definitely pick me up. But maybe that’s not what was in Neo’s mind….
November 30th, 2010 at 5:53 pm
As far as its being duck hunting camo, the colors are all wrong and showing way too much skin. Unlike deer, ducks do see in color and the wrong colors will scare them off. I do get your point however. It is a horrible dress.
It might be good to see what could be done that looks good (if a bit odd) as eveningwear in Max4 or one of the other hunting camo patterns.
November 30th, 2010 at 6:00 pm
Her cup runneth over.
November 30th, 2010 at 6:36 pm
Fah…. now this…. THIS….. is the dress!
http://racked.com/archives/2010/11/29/how-to-snag-prince-charming-wear-this-dressthing-in-public.php
November 30th, 2010 at 7:31 pm
Adorable and my next post
November 30th, 2010 at 7:39 pm
Yeah, I didn’t really notice the dress.
November 30th, 2010 at 10:41 pm
Proves once again you can dress a pretty woman in anything and it don’t change a thing.
November 30th, 2010 at 11:09 pm
It is reassuring to know that my generation did not have a monopoly on inanity.
Wiki, wiki…
November 30th, 2010 at 11:10 pm
Mr. Frank wins the comment of the thread award.
December 1st, 2010 at 12:21 am
2010 update of Mae West style? Anyway it would work on a Victoria Secrets Runway, where everybody would just be admiring the fashionabilitease…
December 1st, 2010 at 1:20 am
That can’t be refudiaterated…
December 1st, 2010 at 4:44 am
Feathers? I don’t see any feathers.
And Baklava is right. Once you see the front… Oh my…
If she finds herself out of work she can always get a job as a life preserver.
December 1st, 2010 at 6:59 am
I suppose most folks on here don’t know: Gets mighty cold in a duck blind.
December 1st, 2010 at 8:16 am
Mr. Frank wins? Not yet. Here are two:
-”The game’s afoot!”
-”How do I get out of this chicken outfit?”
December 1st, 2010 at 7:02 pm
ACHOOOOO! Sorry I am just allergic to your dress.
On another note, I wonder why feathers are not politically incorrect, like fur is. Maybe because birds are dumb and are not “cute”?
December 1st, 2010 at 7:25 pm
Nice, um, tailfeathers.
May 20th, 2011 at 6:26 pm
Thanks very much for this great submit;that is the form of thing that keeps me going by way of these day. I’ve been wanting round for this site after being referred to them from a buddy and was happy when I discovered it after looking for some time. Being a avid blogger, I’m pleased to see others taking initivative and contributing to the community. Just needed to remark to point out my appreciation to your article as it’s very appleaing, and plenty of writers do not get authorization they deserve. I’m positive I’ll drop by again and can suggest to my friends.