Home » Obama gets more flak on Israel…

Comments

Obama gets more flak on Israel… — 15 Comments

  1. “I continue to think that none of this will hurt Obama with the vast majority of Democratic voters. Nothing seems to.”

    I agree. While he will likely get less than the 78% of the Jewish vote that he got in 2008, considering Jews are a tiny 2% of the U.S. population, it probably won’t matter if he gets 78% of the Jewish vote or 50%. It might impact his fundraising some, but even that is quesionable.

    The strongest Christian supporters of Israel are evangelicals — the majority of whom already vote Republican. Like you, I just don’t see this dust up having a meaningful impact on the elections. As EVERYTHING Obama does is considered first within the context of its political implications, he is fully aware this will be a minor impact on his re-election prospects.

  2. Reid has consistently opposed Obama on Israel.

    Example are the flotilla and a June 15, 2009 letter to Obama which stated “Last year, the Senate passed my bipartisan resolution to proudly celebrate the 60th Anniversary of the modern state of Israel and recognize the historic kingdom of Israel, which was established more than 3,000 years ago.” Reid also supported Israel when they invaded Gaza in 2008 and called Hamas a terrorist organization.

    This troubles Reid’s supporters who accuse him of being a sell out to the Jewish Lobby. They state things like Reid’s wife is a Jew who converted to Mormonism; Mormonism is a pseudo-Jewish religion (the lost tribes of Israel); and the Las Vegas money Jewish mob connections.

    The same people also accuse Obama of the same thing. Abner Mikva, former Clinton White House counsel, calls Obama “our first Jewish president” based on his roots in West Side Chicago politics.

  3. If Obama wins in 2012, the last vestige of my respect for the American voter will vanish.

    I have said over and over…our problem isn’t our politicians…our problem is our voters.

    It makes me cringe when I hear about “get out the vote” campaigns.

  4. Excerpt from Netanyahu’s speech to AIPAC:

    We got to visit Washington’s majestic memorials. I read Jefferson’s timeless words, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.” I read Lincoln’s immortal address, “government of the people, for the people, by the people.”

    Now, let me tell you why these words resonate so powerfully with me and with all Israelis – because they’re rooted in ideas first championed by our people, the Jewish people, the idea that all men are created in God’s image, that no ruler is above the law, that everyone is entitled to justice. These are revolutionary Jewish ideas, and they were spoken thousands of years ago – when vast empires ruled the earth, vast slave empires ruled the world. And the Jews spoke these truths.

  5. “all bets are off after Obama is elected to a second term, should that undesirable event occur. Whatever statements, promises, or assurances he has given previously to whatever interest group, no one should feel that his word has any meaning whatsoever. He will have cast off the need to appeal to any constituency save himself.”

    I agree. Obama, if re-elected, will unabashedly do everything possible to make his socialist ideology a reality. He will feel no need to hide who and what he is; and the MSM will feel even more emboldened to aid and abet his desire to achieve his agenda. All that will hold him in check is a republican controlled house (with the will to do their sworn duty) and hopefully a senate with a slim republican majority. However, I’m of the opinion he can be defeated by a strong, articulate fiscally conservative opponent. “Its the economy, stupid.”

    “I have said over and over…our problem isn’t our politicians…our problem is our voters.”

    Hear, hear!

  6. Congress got the speech of a lifetime from Netanyahu. Wow!

    You won’t hear a word about it from the state run media most likely.

    The Daily Kos and the Grio: nothing. Chris Cillizza from the WaPo: nothing.

    Score one for the Huffington Post: Netanyahu talks “painful compromises’ in speech to Congress. Israeli PM heckled.

  7. Joke going around the e-mail circuit.
    “Dear Mr. President,
    We in Israel demand that the U.S. return to its 1959 borders. This will please the poor Hawaiian people whose land you have annexed.

    Now, Mr. President, you know what an unreasonable demand looks like.
    Benjamin Netanyahu”

    Saw parts of Netanyahu’s speech in Congress on Hannity tonight. The dems were notable in withholding their applause. He put it to them and good. Truly speaking truth to power.

    The man is a lion!

  8. As far as I heard it, part of Obama’s message to the Israelis was, “The solemn guarantees and assurances issued to you by previous American presidents are meaningless. Trust your lives to my guarantees and assurances.”

    No one who is modest runs for president but Obama’s self-regard verges on hubris.

  9. United Nations Security Council Resolution 242

    United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 (S/RES/242) was adopted unanimously by the UN Security Council on November 22, 1967, in the aftermath of the Six Day War. It was adopted under Chapter VI of the United Nations Charter

    Operative Paragraph One “Affirms that the fulfillment of Charter principles requires the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which should include the application of both the following principles:

    (i) Withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict;

    (ii) Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force.”

    Resolution 242 is one of the most commonly referred UN resolutions to end the Arab—Israeli conflict, and the basis of later negotiations between the parties.

    Egypt, Jordan, Israel and Lebanon entered into consultations with the UN Special representative over the implementation of 242. After denouncing it in 1967, Syria “conditionally” accepted the resolution in March 1972. Syria formally accepted UN Security Council Resolution 338, the cease-fire at the end of the Yom Kippur War (in 1973), which embraced resolution 242

    In a statement to the General Assembly on 15 October 1968, the PLO rejected Resolution 242, saying “the implementation of said resolution will lead to the loss of every hope for the establishment of peace and security in Palestine and the Middle East region.” In September 1993, the PLO agreed that Resolutions 242 and 338 should be the basis for negotiations with Israel when it signed the Declaration of Principles.

    Negotiations concerning the agreements, an outgrowth of the Madrid Conference of 1991, were conducted secretly in Oslo, Norway, hosted by the Fafo institute, and completed on 20 August 1993; the Accords were subsequently officially signed at a public ceremony in Washington, DC on 13 September 1993, in the presence of PLO chairman Yasser Arafat, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and US President Bill Clinton. The documents themselves were signed by Mahmoud Abbas for the PLO, foreign Minister Shimon Peres for Israel, Secretary of State Warren Christopher for the United States and foreign minister Andrei Kozyrev for Russia.

    — Declaration of Principles

    back to UN

    Secretary of State Dean Rusk commented on the most significant area of disagreement regarding the resolution:

    There was much bickering over whether that resolution should say from “the” territories or from “all” territories.

    In the French version, which is equally authentic, it says withdrawal de territory, with de meaning “the.”

    We wanted that to be left a little vague and subject to future negotiation because we thought the Israeli border along the West Bank could be “rationalized”; certain anomalies could easily be straightened out with some exchanges of territory, making a more sensible border for all parties.

    We also wanted to leave open demilitarization measures in the Sinai and the Golan Heights and take a fresh look at the old city of Jerusalem.

    But we never contemplated any significant grant of territory to Israel as a result of the June 1967 war. On that point we and the Israelis to this day remain sharply divided.

    This situation could lead to real trouble in the future.

    Although every President since Harry Truman has committed the United States to the security and independence of Israel, I’m not aware of any commitment the United States has made to assist Israel in retaining territories seized in the Six-Day War.

    “What’s on the Arab Ambassadors’ minds boils down to one big question: Will we make good on our pledge to support the territorial integrity of all states in the Middle East? Our best answer is that we stand by that pledge, but the only way to make good on it is to have a genuine peace. The tough question is whether we’d force Israel back to 4 June borders if the Arabs accepted terms that amounted to an honest peace settlement. Secretary Rusk told the Yugoslav Foreign Minister: ‘The US had no problem with frontiers as they existed before the outbreak of hostilities. If we are talking about national frontiers–in a state of peace–then we will work toward restoring them.’ But we all know that could lead to a tangle with the Israelis.” President Johnson (LBJ)

    In the pre-1967 borders Israel was barely 10 miles wide at its narrowest point. The bulk of Israel’s population lived within artillery range of hostile Arab armies.

    I am not about to ask Israel to live that way again…

    So the United States will not support the establishment of an independent Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza, and we will not support annexation or permanent control by Israel.

    There is, however, another way to peace.

    The final status of these lands must, of course, be reached through the give-and-take of negotiations; but it is the firm view of the United States that self-government by the Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza in association with Jordan offers the best chance for a durable, just and lasting peace.

    It is the United States’ position that – in return for peace – the withdrawal provision of Resolution 242 applies to all fronts, including the West Bank and Gaza.

    When the border is negotiated between Jordan and Israel, our view on the extent to which Israel should be asked to give up territory will be heavily affected by the extent of true peace and normalization and the security arrangements offered in return.

    Finally, we remain convinced that Jerusalem must remain undivided, but its final status should be decided through negotiations

    Ronald Reagan

    The resolution also calls for the implementation of the “land for peace” formula, calling for Israeli withdrawal from “territories” it had occupied in 1967 in exchange for peace with its neighbors.[21] This was an important advance at the time, considering that there were no peace treaties between any Arab state and Israel until the Israel-Egypt Peace Treaty of 1979. “Land for peace” served as the basis of the Israel-Egypt Peace Treaty, in which Israel withdrew from the Sinai peninsula (Egypt withdrew its claims to the Gaza Strip in favor of the Palestine Liberation Organization). Jordan renounced its claims regarding the West Bank in favor of the Palestine Liberation Organization, and has signed the Israel-Jordan Treaty of Peace in 1994, that established the Jordan River as the boundary of Jordan.

  10. Throughout the 60s more soviet homes wer pinned on Nasser than on any other third world leader outside latin America.

    Soviet ideologist devised the term “non-capitalist path” and “revolutionary democracy” to define a progressive intermediate stage between capitalism and socialism.

    Nasser’s decision to nationalize much of Egyptian industry in 19611 provided encouraging evidence of his own progress down the “Non-capitalist path”. Among soviet agents who eulogized his achievements was the former SIS officer Kim Philby, who until his defection to Moscow in 1963 was the Beirut correspondent for the observer and the economist.

    In an article entitled ‘Nasser’s pride and glory” on the tenth anniversary of the Egyptian revolution in the sumber of 1962, Philby declared that he had successfully turnd Egypt into a ‘co-operative socialist democracy’: It is now as difficult to conceive an Egypt without Nasser, as a Yugoslavia without Tito, or a India without Nehru — and Nasser is still a young man”

    Of all the Soviet aid to the third world between 1954 and 1961, 43% went to Egypt. In 1964 nasser was made a Hero of the Soviet Union, the USSRs highest decoration. A year later, the Egyptian communist party dissolved itself and its members applied for membership of the ruling Arab Socialist Union.

    By the mid 60s, the majority view among Moscow middle east experts, was that the soviet equipment, and training, had transformed Egyptian armed forces. They were dissolusioned by the humiliating outcome of the Arab Israeli six day war in 1967

    The Israeli attack on Egypt at 8:45 am (Cairo time) on 5th of June took the Centre as well as Nasser by surprise. The Soviet news media learned of the attack before the KGB, which only discovered the outbreak for war from intercepted associated press reports.

    the war was virtually decided during the first three hours when Israeli air raids destroyed 286 of 340 egyptian combat aircraft on the ground, leaving the Egyptian army without air cover during the ensuing battles

    On 28 june, 1967, in one of his first speeches as KGB chairman, Yuri Andropov addressed the KGB communist party activist on the subject of “the soviet unions policy regarding israels aggression in the near east”. In order to avoid similar intellgence failures in the future, and have timly information and forcasts of events, the KGB must draw highly qualified spcialists into intelligence work from a variety of academic fields.

    They tagged a man by the name of Primakov… (a name to remember and look up!!), code name MAKS… he later became head of the SVR, and a prime minister under Boris Yeltsin.

    In late 60s, primakov became connected to Hafiz Al-Asad in Syria, and Saddam Hussein in iraq… he is quoted as making modest but always “politically correct” strides during this period. (PC is a soviet term)

    In public the Kremlins too by Nasser and the Arab cause…
    And broke off diplomatic connections with Israel.

    The debacle of the six day war left Moscow with only two options:

    Either to cut loses or rebuild Arab armies.

    It chose the second. Podgorny (president) visited Egypt with an entourage which included Marshal Matvei Zakharov chief of general staff, kirpichenko, and primikov.

    Zakharov stayed on to advise on the reorganization and re-equipment of the Egyptian army. Desperate to prove his role as a hero, nassar proved willing to make larger concessios in return for soviet help than before.

    He told Podgorny:

    What is important fo us that we now recognize our main enemy is the united states and that the ONLY possible way of continuing our struggle is for us to ally ourselves with the Soviet Union… Before the fighting broke out, we were afraid that we would be accused by the western media of being aligned (with the soviet union), but nothing of that sort concerns us any longer.
    We are ready to offer facilitaies to the soviet fleet from said to salloum, and from al-arish to Gaza

    Soviet advisors in Egypt eventually numbered 20,000. in 1970 at nassers request, soviet airbases, equipped with SAM-3 issles and combat aircraft with Russian crews, were established to strengthen Egyptian defenses.

    The people cant eat socialism. if thy weren’t Egyptian they’d beat me with their shoes” Nasser

    There is a WHOLE lot more with details in:
    The world was going our way: the KGB and the battle for the Third World
    By Christopher M. Andrew, Vasili Mitrokhin

    Sadat kind of crumbled that relationship..

    It goes over the coup by Sudanese army officers… supported by the communsts…

    “I cannot allow a communist regime to be established in a country sharing my borders” Sadat said..

    And Nimeiri was returned to power.. the general secretary of the Sudanese communist party, abdel maghoub, was executed. Russia at the same time found out about Vladimir Nikolayevich, Sakharov was working for the CIA.

    Sakharov went to his car, and found a bouquet of flowers in the backseat (Agency signal)
    He defected right away… just in time.. [among things he divulged was that Sharaf was with the KGB]

    It was SIX years later that the Arab states [Qaddafi (libya), Asad (syria), and Sadat (Egypt)], were thought by the KGB to be ramping up to collude and attack Israel.

    The constant readiness, and backing down desensitized the players

    May, 1973… the Yom Kippur war broke out…

    Basically the same tactical idea as Tet Offensive.
    Attack during a special holiday to gain advantage…

    Robert Gates said it was his worst personal intelligence embarrassment

    A whole bunch of stuff back and forth happened, but then the soviets wanted revenge!!! And when they want revenge… they mobilize..

    They started an active measures campaign targeted at Marwan… (Nasser’s son in law)
    Service A even went so far as to push the point of Sadats early enthusiasm for Adolf Hitler. (just as today, people are being told of grandparents who were Nazi in wwii).

    It all came from the fact that at 14 years old, Nasser admired Hitler for wanting to rebuild his country. at the time he just became chancellor. Not such a big deal since TIME made Hitler man of the year too… his later admiration for Rommel, and others was used against him. (as an aside, American tank soldiers today are known to have images of Rommel up! an opponent they respected)

    Russia was proud of such active measures as:
    Anwar Sadat: From Fascism to Zionism..
    [it portrayed him as a nazi agent who went over to the CIA]

    No other third world leader inspired loathing by Moscow as Sadat
    Oleg gordievsky heard a number of KGB officers say he should be bumped off. Though there is no evidence that the Centre was every implicated in such a plot, it was aware that some of its contacts were. in December 1977 it received information that a secret meeting in Damascus between leaders of Syrian intelligence and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine had discussed plans for assassinating Sadat and Marwan.

    On October 6 1981, the anniversary of the outbreak of the Yom Kippur war, Sadat was assassinated by fundamentalist fanatics while reviewing a military parade. While archives make no notice that the KGB knew in advance, the news that it worked was greeted with jubilation

    He has been called the Egyptian Darkness…. – Gromyko

    It then goes into Iran and Iraq…

  11. A few years ago I had an idea, “Netanyahu for President in 2012” bumper stickers and I went no where with it. Boy am I kicking myself now.

  12. Wait, if they return to the pre-June ’67 borders, doesn’t that mean that Egypt takes over Gaza and Jordan takes over the West Bank? You know, that isn’t a half-bad idea!

  13. Richard Saunders,
    Only problem with that is they (Egypt, Jordan, et al) don’t want anything to do with them!

    If you remember, when the wall separating Gaza from Egypt broke several years ago (about Jan. 2008, I believe) and tens of thousands of Gazans teemed into Egypt, Egypt freaked and couldn’t cram them back in fast enough! And the Egyptians practically did all but move heaven and earth (and if required, probably would have done that, too!) to get that wall fixed and CLOSED OFF.

    They didn’t want Yasser Arafat back for burial when he died, nor did the Israelis or Muslim Arabs want Arafat buried on the Temple where HE wanted to be buried!

    The fact is, all the Arabs can grumble and grouse and teach their children to hate Jews, ascribing causal reason for such hate to existence of Israel- to the tiny sliver of land they now have — after they were attacked by no less thab 5 Arab countries in a single day for no more provocation than being Jewish and being alive. That tiny sliver ot land — bare and barren desert, that has since been developed, irrigated to create a successful agricultural business and industrialized while forming a truly democratic govt. — for Jews and resident Arabs and a free-market based economy that has succeeded in becoming a center for many industries. This reformed sliver of land is THE one that must be divided to create a state for self-proclaimed Palestinians (regardless the land of their forefathers) and disregarding the huge unpopulated and unused masses of land within surrounding Arab countries.

    They’ve spent all these years hating Jews and Israel to support their “Arab” brothers, the Palestinians, whom they’be done zero to support. However, they are quick to find them useful as customers for as many arms as they have to sell (all bought with foreign assistance $, like from us!)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>