1. Once is an anomaly; twice, a coincidence; thrice, a trend; everything after, evidentiary (usually tagged exhibit A, B, C, and so on).

2. Another item for the bulging “what if Bush had done this” file.

   “Jewish janitors” reminds me of a fond dream: go back to college, major in sociology, flunk my classes, then change my major to physics and graduate (again!). I’d like to be the only person in human history ever to do that.

   As an aside, am I the only person who now breaks out in hives when the Messiah says “folks?” I’m getting very tired of the faux “folksy” shtick.

3. That new YouTube embeddable player sure is drab looking. What were they thinking? Apologies for being a little off topic.

4. This will die. Potatoes lives on forever. Any idea why?

5. Richard Aubrey: don’t you mean “potatoe”?

6. Richard:

   This will die and “potatoe” lives on because poor Dan Quayle’s gaffe has the entire weight of the news and entertainment media working to keep it alive.

   If I had the whole American media establishment at my beck and call I could make Obama look like anything you choose.

7. Obama was channeling Rev. Wright.

8. Trimegistus,

   You are right. I remember reading the comments of some reality show — Survivor, I think it was — who said that if they have 60 hours of film on you and are going to show 15 minutes, they can make absolutely any story or any character out of you they want.

9. If I had the whole American media establishment at my beck and call I could make Obama look like anything you choose.

   Except competent.

10. As you all may know, there was a mitigating circumstance for Dan Quayle’s gaffe. He had been provided a list of the ‘correct’ spellings of the words, one of which was ‘potatoe’. It is true that he did not spot the error on the list and went along with it, assuming that the teacher must be correct.

    Maybe he did not have the fortunate experience I had with teachers, even in grade school, who would accept a correction when I was correct in pointing out an error. They helped me learn early that authority was not always right.

11. Our minds work through association. So, the question is in what context does “Jew” exist?

12. Over at Ace of Spades, there’s a long post on Jews,dems, libs, Israel, and the perennial dem warning about fundie Xians and the end times. Comments are more thoughtful than usual and there are hilarious references to “janitors”.

13. I was thinking “judo champion” myself. Other possibilities include “jewelrymaker,” “Jewel grocery store clerk,” “Juniper tree grower,” and, of course (of course!) “junebug-studying entomologist.”

    On a related note, how do you say “janitor” in Austrian?

14. “As an aside, am I the only person who now breaks out in hives when the Messiah says “folks?” I’m getting very tired of the faux “folksy” shtick.”

    Or when he drops his “g’s”, using the cadence of a revival preacher in a tent meeting.

15. Maybe he was in party mode and referring to Juve Morning (joovay), an important date in Carnival season in the Caribbean and other places.

16. The most interesting part of this whole episode is that the Indonesian Imbecile is now on his “billionaires should pay the same taxes as plumbers” (the newest version, so as to avoid Barky’s Joooo-Turret’s, I guess) meaning that he is now advocating a flat tax! Why is everyone missing this? They missed Barky doing the same sort of thing when he argued against the “unfair” tax deductions that high income earners get for their charitable donations.

    Of course, the Indonesian Imbecile is, indeed, an imbecile, so it’s correct for people to just ignore anything he says (as he is really too stupid to be taken seriously on any topic) … but it’s still a bit sad to see people letting him get away with another set of contradictory claims. Unreal.

17. I believe it’s called a ‘kinsley gaffe,’ wherein the politician accidentally says what he really thinks; see ‘bitter clingers.’

18. ErisGuy: re Obama’s “bitter clingers” remark: yes he was saying what he really thought. I am not sure it was a necessarily a Kinsley gaffe, an inadvertent slip. He was talking to a group of wealthy San Francisco donors, a group who would have agreed with the “bitter clingers” characterization of rural Pennsylvanians.

    This was more of a “what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas” remark. Obama figured that as he was among friends, he could say what he thought. Obama also figured that as he was among friends, that those who were not friends would have access to his remarks. He let his guard down.

19. correction:
    Obama also figured that as he was among friends, that those who were not friends would not have access to his remarks. He let his guard down.

20. The Wan is innumerate — which is why 57 is the new 50.

    You must realize that he can’t perform long division.

    When his economic team starts crunching numbers — his eyes glaze over.

    —-

    No doubt Barry has Bibi on the mind — a real ear worm, no doubt.

21. Parapraxis means nothing….

    If your investment professional slips up, and you realize a week later it wasnt a joke and he was referring to his new home in barbados, and he cant be found…

    Just remember, parapraxis means nothing…
    and “The Psychopathology of Everyday Life” is….

    “Well, You know what a Freudian slip is? It’s when you think one thing and say your mother.”
    ~ Oedipus

    So Obama saying Jew, is nothing…

    Helen Thomas saying Jews go back, is nothing

    Dunn admiring mother Theresa and chairman Mao in one sentence was a nothing

    Reverend Wright saying G D America… nothing

    Obama, fundamental transformation, nothing…

    how about slips in action?
    Bows to the caliphate?
    Automatically makes a officer guilty for doing their job?

    would you say, that Obama’s slip up with Joe the plumber was parapraxis?

    how about the director of the Office of Management and Budget saying we need less democracy?

    how about the NC governor Perdue, who says we should suspend elections for a couple of years and give a blank check to congress?

    Van Jones calling for the administration to integrate the business system with “the gulag system”?

    with the left socialists Versprechen, Verhé¶ren, Verschreiben, Verlesen, are all ways to push the limit and then backpeddle

    using helen thomas as a example:

    What would have happened when she said that if the reporter instead pretended to agree with her?

    Does Wilhelm Fliess ring a bell to anyone?

    “I do not believe that an event in whose occurrence my mental life plays no part can teach me any hidden thing about the future shape of reality; but I believe that an unintentional manifestation of my own mental activity does on the other hand disclose something hidden, though again it is something that belongs only to my mental life [not to external reality]. I believe in external (real) chance, it is true, but not in internal (psychical) accidental events.” (Freud, 1901b, p328)

    but let me move over a tiny bit and point something out from all this…

    there are slips which are normal… ie, we all do it, and so on…

    but there are special slips… slips we forget exist, slips caused by the complexities of living a double life

    a person who is a revolutionary, leads a double life. at least the real ones do. So a person who is living a double life of some sorts, tends to make more meaningful mistakes.

    the couple who are spying and forget their married names… the german operative who lapses into german after pretending that he doesnt know the language at all.

    not only do such things become noteworthy, but they are what people use to determine honesty as well.

    prior to the fomenting of gay is good, gays led double lives and were OFTEN tagged by spy agencies because of it. ie, they needed less training in how to maintain separate lives.

    another group that lives double lives are the sub clinical sociopaths…

    we know obama poses as something he isnt… his is an image, not a substantial form. his image is also of a sociopathic controlling nature in which he will say different things to different groups as if they cant compare notes (which in the past they couldn’t easily).

    so a person, who has a hidden agenda and worldview they KNOW the population would abhor… but do not recuse themselves, have to do this

    i have spoken of this dual mind thing before. but few care to learn about it, and what people did about knowing it.

    to show another example… we often worry about people around us we care about who are about to commit suicide… well, parapraxis is there too, as the person doing it, often, but not always gives out signs or freudian slips in Versprechen, Verhé¶ren, Verschreiben, Verlesen….

    how do you catch a subclinical sociopath?

    parapraxis

    they not only mismatch words and deeds

    They slip up verbally

    AND to put icing on that cake, they have a desire for duping delight… that is playing tricks on people.

    It is THIS that makes them gaffe-tastic

    why?

    well, since they have no feelings the same way, what they do, at best, is pretend… so they have learned all their lives to pretend the right things so that people dont get a clue to them.

    the child who used to bury cats up to their necks and run them over with the lawnmower as an adult seems to care deeply for animals… (but out of view you catch them doing something and are confused)

    their duping delight is why such people ruin their lives and get caught. once tuned to it, you see it and note it, and also note that others are invisable.

    want to know the difference between obama of the election and obama today?

    nothing.

    the difference is in the people who were duped, and OVER TIME, the parapraxis shows itself.

    obama has been showing it big time
    and we have been ignoring it
    from the wifes position in hating the US, then liking it
    to his holding his head up like el duce
    to his comments that he thinks all will like, but have to backpeddle when his guess is wrong.

    and how wrong he can be shows that he is playing people, not showing himself.

    one last thing. its easy to spot them if you can tell the difference between substance and surface.

    sociopaths are cargo cult..

    they wont learn what they can pretend
    if they do learn, its to make the pretending greater
    they LOVE affirmative action

    when your personality is all about fronts and dual living and playing people. its hard to have the discipline to study, do well and all that in the classic sense. your make up is to game the systems by playing their inputs, rather than actually doing it.

    in one aspect you can see them as shadow people. unreal… not fully anything… but what they think you want to see..

    once the glamour wears off though…
    the spell is broken
    and rarely without romantic reason or attachement does the victim stroll back for another round.

    a gaggle of them colluding is what our society now has in politics as the anti culture things they deconstruct are what we use to detect them and keep them out of critical places.

    one example: merit:
    in a society who chooses a proxy for merit over merit, one then can define the ability based on something that is easy to portray or pose… so a society that abandons merit for image, is a society that favors the sociopaths rule over competent ones, as merit is how we filter out the poseur.

    merit is the scratch test that determines whether gold is gilt or solid..

    by the way.. copious amounts of indiscriminate sex, not caring aobu the outcomes, moving away from merit, breaking the family to affect more of your kind, and so on… are all the symptoms of sociopaths moving in..

    they HAD to redefine the game tht filters them out
    the fools under false liberation, changed to improve things, not for all, but for the few who have no guilt

    how else can they work and starve 100 million to death and want more of it? how else can dunn admire mao… because sadistic power and such admires such.. which is why they keep dedicating things to satan… (alinsky did, as did moses harmon, among others)

    their parapraxis is in that they are not horrifies by such things and solutions to public issues, they dream of having that power themselves and playing!!!!

    given most of us are normal, and dont want that, we refuse to catch them in some childish way that ignoring the monster under the bead will make it all go away in the morning.

    but the monster under the bed is not real

    and the monsters i am referring to are real, walking among you, educated, and colluding…

22. “Jewish janitors” reminds me of a fond dream..

    it reminds me of a horror reality…

    but then again, i guess you have to know history in detail. even the history that implied and was used in Good Will Hunting…

    ie… soviet scientists were often janitors

    The Soviet Union: empire, nation, and system
    By Aron Kat︠s︡enelinboĭgen

    it was Rostropovich who hired Solzhenitsyn as a gardner or janitor to serve in his house and then save him from the laws on parasitism…

    “My book was directed to empathise with the thoughts, feelings and the psychology of the Jews – their spiritual component,” he said. “I have never made general conclusions about a people. I will always differentiate between layers of Jews. One layer rushed headfirst to the revolution. Another, to the contrary, was trying to stand back. The Jewish subject for a long time was considered prohibited. Zhabotinsky [a Jewish writer] once said that the best service our Russian friends give to us is never to speak aloud about us.” – Solzhenitsyn

    the responds:
    “The question of ethnicity did not have any importance either in the revolution or the story of the NKVD. This was a social revolution and those who served in the NKVD and cheka were serving ideas of social change – Vassili Berezhkov

    you CANT be a student of socialist history and ideology and not run into “the jewish question”, like the “womens question” later etc..

    ALSO…

    anyone notice that Obama has faciltated a huge war against israel by erasing the peace treaties? snubbing them… and more?

    how about his ideas of Nazi Social Justice for the Volk hurt by white privelege? (note i quoted wiki quoting the left informing us that white also includes jews)

    his anger at the bankers… the money changers.

    oh… and please note his code name from secret service (as a parapraxis word game), is renegade. an apostate to islam from christiantity was the original.

    how can you be a marxist and love jews

    hows this:
    their hatred of capitalism is Jewish hate/antisemitism

    of course if one has not read marx, lenin, and all the giants as one is not a follower… then one would not know the mental positions of followers other than what they pretend to show…

    if one DID read beyojnd the surface one would find out that to the left, judaism and capitalism are the same thing!!!

    that they equate capitalism with judaism, and bankers, and that they all speak that to end capitalism you have to exterminate the jews (And now this century the white west society – as Christians showed they were jew lovers in the eyes of these racists)…

    in fact, you can find tropes where those in the know try to keep those asleep by making false claims.

    one of my favorites is to say that a world without jews is not a call to exterminate them… most of these tropes rely on the fact that the reader having got that far, by accident, had not read engels quote about the world war conflagration that would sweep them off the face.

    example:

    “World Without Jews” is not a call for the extermination of Jews, as the title might imply, but rather Marx’s analysis of why most Jews were not interested in the working class movement of his day. He wanted Jews to cease identifying themselves as Jews first and foremost and instead adopt a more universalist outlook, which would aid their participation in the workers’ movement. Marx saw Judaism, the religion, as a barrier to developing class consciousness, so he saw a “world without Jews” as the only way the European working classes would be able to unite. It is important to keep in mind that the translators of this work into English have largely been of the “Jews Against Communism” variety, and so the anti-Judaic tone of the work is not necessarily due to Marx alone. The fact that Jews are taught to identify themselves as a race, instead of merely as co-religionists, was what Marx was decrying in this pamphlet, not the fact that there are Jews at all. Marx’s contempt for religion in general is well known, and as a Jew by birth (although his family converted to Christianity) he had an insider’s perspective on the problems that identifying oneself as a Jew presented to the working class movement at the time that he wanted to share with non-Jews.

    see? hitler got it wrong… the soviets got it wrong
    obama and modern marxists have it wrong

    they just want htem to leave the planet and have no part in the future… not exterminate them… (hunh?)

    well if you accept that point, then explain this quote:
    What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money. Marx

    and since its not really extermination but emancipation…

    Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our time. An organization of society [such as communism] which would abolish the preconditions for huckstering, and therefore the possibility of huckstering, would make [this] Jew impossible. His religious consciousness would be dissipated like a thin haze in the real, vital air of society. On the other hand, if the Jew recognizes that this practical nature of his is futile and works to abolish it, he extricates himself from his previous development and works for human emancipation as such and turns against the supreme practical expression of human self-estrangement.

    and where does the african marxist get the idea of white privelege and such?

    The Christian state can behave towards the Jew only in the way characteristic of the Christian state — that is, by granting privileges, by permitting the separation of the Jew from the other subjects, but making him feel the pressure of all the other separate spheres of society, and feel it all the more intensely because he is in religious opposition to the dominant religion. But the Jew, too, can behave towards the state only in a Jewish way — that is, by treating it as something alien to him, by counterposing his imaginary nationality to the real nationality, by counterposing his illusory law to the real law, by deeming himself justified in separating himself from mankind, by abstaining on principle from taking part in the historical movement, by putting his trust in a future which has nothing in common with the future of mankind in general, and by seeing himself as a member of the Jewish people, and the Jewish people as the chosen people.

    On what grounds, then, do you Jews want emancipation? On account of your religion? It is the mortal enemy of the state religion. As citizens? In Germany, there are no citizens. As human beings? But you are no more human beings than those to whom you appeal.

    so you are no more human beings than those who you appeal…

    a bit more direct info?
    ok

    here is a book excerpt:
    City of gold: an apology for global capitalism in a time of discontent By David A. Westbrook
    preview.tinyurl.com/3bsshnp

    indeed, many americans work harder than is healthy, harder than they can enjoy… it is easy enougyh to understand the economy in rationlistic terms, but scrutiny of actual people going to work whether corporate lawyer or janitor — destroys the comforting idea that we work for rational reasons. it is not to excessive to understand the american idea of work as essentially religious observance, if perhaps one whose deeper meanings have been forgotten…

    the next set of paragraphs, ties corporate lawyer and janitors to jews..

    in this vein, we might understand marx famous problems with jews, his own back ground not withsdanding, in terms of this opposition between work and money, in which work is a form of observance, and money seeks ot change and so undermin that which is respcted.

    prhased medievally, the worker shoulder adams burden and labors. in accepting their station and participating inthe just social order, the worker is observant, or as a vassal to his lord, worshipful.

    in contrast the money lender often a jew, makes money without working. furthermore, the moneylender profits fromthe amitions of others, that is, profits from the desire to change the order.

    now city of gold was written in 2004…

    if your a modern liberal Marxist
    then you have read this kind of thing.

    and all it does is reinforce the soviet measure that the jews are the bankers/moneylenders and have privelege and that they practice capitalism as a religion and so on.

    IF you read this stuff, then all thats going on, makes perfect sense!!!!

    heck… fukiyamas gbook the end of history was quoting marx as to the withering of the state… not very withered…

    i leave with one more Westbrook quote from his book near the same page as above (note the authenticity angle, and compare that to obamas words in other areas too):

    The just social order is atemporal because its perfect, a very midevil thought. yet money as we discussed, is both profoundly temporal and inauthentic.
    the jew as moneylender, that scapegoat of the midevil mind, reappears in the ostensibly atheistic marx as a huckster, the figure of inauthenticity, who instantiates nad profits from the corruption of contemporary social life, based on financal communication, untruths, and exploitation

    THIS is the mindset behind the closed doors sealed by ignorance.

    for obama to associate jews with bankers huckstering to not pay taxes and let others do that. FITS MARX..

    so much for parapraxis being a nothing among subversives…

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>