Perplexed about the Cain sexual harassment charges? Well, be perplexed no more; clarity is here:
Something or someone got into some cab somewhere at some time in the late 1990s and went back to Herman Cains’ home, apartment, condo, mansion, pizza parlor, Airstream trailer, neighborhood, city, state or region. He, she or it stayed there for a minute, an hour, overnight and was seen at work the next day looking like he, she or it was at work. Of all this our reporters are absolutely sure except when we are not and need to issue a correction. And another correction. And another. Stay tuned. This just in…
This entry was posted
on Friday, November 4th, 2011 at 3:07 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Previously a lifelong Democrat, born in New York and living in New England, surrounded by liberals on all sides, I've found myself slowly but surely 
November 4th, 2011 at 3:28 pm
That deserves a Pulitzer.
November 4th, 2011 at 3:54 pm
That sums up everything we know quite nicely.
November 4th, 2011 at 4:51 pm
Those are the known unknowns. What about the unknown unknowns?
Journalism is no longer about reporting facts. It is gossip with an agenda.
November 5th, 2011 at 12:32 am
Tom could add:
Addendum – Herman Cain should’ve responded appropriately as he had forwarning that the someone made an accusation and therefore the accusation could’ve been responded to especially given that Herman Cain was given forwarning. It shows a lack of experience and skill in all things with respect to life and liberty and being able to apply experience and knowledge of how to handle a situation dealing with life and liberty.
November 6th, 2011 at 9:30 am
You may all laugh if you want to, but you have my word that the aforementioned statement about Mr. Cain is true. To the best of my knowledge, I was there. And, of
course, you may quote me if you wish.