December 12th, 2011

Obama: all the Republican candidates are the same because…

they’re all Republicans.

Somehow I don’t think that’s a good approach for Obama to take in his re-election campaign. After all, most polls indicate that a generic Republican does better against Obama than any of the individual candidates we actually have. Emphasizing their generic Republicanism is more likely to enhance their chances of being elected than reduce them. Emphasizing their individual and personal failings and crochets seems much more likely to do the trick.

But why am I giving Obama advice, anyway?

2 Responses to “Obama: all the Republican candidates are the same because…”

  1. Occam's Beard Says:

    But why am I giving Obama advice, anyway?

    Don’t worry about it, neo. If he could recognize and take good advice, we wouldn’t be in this fix.

  2. njcommuter Says:

    They don’t all look alike … if you are a Republican.

    Sadly, at this point it appears that only two of the GOP candidates can withstand the Left’s smear-and-slander machine, and they are Newt and Mitt. With a strong GOP Congress, Newt will remove ObamaCare and get started on entitlement reforms; Mitt won’t move until he has a complete plan, which the Donks will sabotage in the legislature at every turn. With a weaker Congress, Newt will still peel back ObamaCare, though there might be some more noxious remnants left.

    What’s not clear is whether any group of present or likely candidates, given four, eight, or twelve years, can salvage the foreign policy mess that this President has given up. LBJ would be proud.

    But nothing will save us abroad if we don’t get our economy back on track. NOTHING.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



About Me

Previously a lifelong Democrat, born in New York and living in New England, surrounded by liberals on all sides, I've found myself slowly but surely leaving the fold and becoming that dread thing: a neocon.
Read More >>








Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AtlasShrugs (fearless)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
Baldilocks (outspoken)
Barcepundit (theBrainInSpain)
Beldar (Texas lawman)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
Breitbart (big)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
Contentions (CommentaryBlog)
DanielInVenezuela (against tyranny)
DeanEsmay (conservative liberal)
Donklephant (political chimera)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (thinking shrink)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InFromTheCold (once a spook)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor is Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
RedState (conservative)
Maggie’sFarm (centrist commune)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
Michelle Obama's Mirror (reflections)
MudvilleGazette (milblog central)
NoPasaran! (behind French facade)
NormanGeras (principled leftist)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob’s blog)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (Jewish refugees)
Powerline (foursight)
ProteinWisdom (wiseguy)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RachelLucas (in Italy)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SecondDraft (be the judge)
SeekerBlog (inquiring minds)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
TheDoctorIsIn (indeed)
Tigerhawk (eclectic talk)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Regent Badge