Comments on: If Obama nominates Hagel for Defense…

By: sheldan

sheldan — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 02:00:15 +0000

Csimon and Neo,

I have read that book, and I recommend it to anyone who wants to understand why Jews have been liberals. Be sure to read the last couple of chapters for an excellent summary.

By: kcom

kcom — Tue, 08 Jan 2013 14:38:25 +0000

Thanks, Rickl. That was it. I guess I didn’t come up with the right words to search for.

By: Gary Rosen

Gary Rosen — Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:33:55 +0000

Parker:

“Its all about the mannish boy flashing the middle finger”

I was thinking of using the phrase “give the finger” in my post. I guess I got my point across :^).

By: parker

parker — Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:25:21 +0000

“We are under attack…”

Yes, we are and it does not matter if you are goy, jew, conservative, or simply an useful idiot leftist kool-aid drinker too stupid to realize you are a target. The only question is how we, as individuals will respond. I will soon be 65, bring it on before I’m too old to be effective for 30 seconds,

By: Promethea

Promethea — Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:04:06 +0000

csimon @ 8:32 . . .

“(Note: I’m a proud Jew myself and mean no disrespect to others because of their faith. I just “don’t get” the whole Jewish- Democrat thing, and particularly, in the case of Obama and his consistent attitude over time.”

Dear csimon,

I think it’s time to recognize the fact that Jews are just not as smart as they think they are. Maybe it’s inbreeding. Maybe it’s their general lack of contact with the physical world. Being “brainy” is very nice, but it’s meaningless when the enemy is approaching.

We are under attack, and all our “nice” friends and relatives are in denial or refuse to think about the nasties who want to kill us. What does that say about Jews? Nothing very good, I’m afraid.

We are the generation who had to wander in the desert for 40 years. Because of decadence and stupidity.

BTW, Rahm Immanuel and David Axelrod are evil men, like Trotsky and Yagoda. We don’t need to claim them as our kinfolk. They should be shunned.

By: Promethea

Promethea — Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:44:36 +0000

It’s late, and I haven’t read the above comments. But since I’ve had enough bourbon to make me uninhibited, I can with confidence say that:

Antisemites are jackasses.

It doesn’t matter who Obama appoints to anything. He is a jackass, and we will be rid of him soon. The traitors in the Democratic party and the wimps in the Republican party will be replaced by men with chests and women with courage.

By: parker

parker — Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:31:02 +0000

“Why didn’t Obama pick a more obvious candidate like say Wesley Clark? With Obama there is always a hidden agenda. In this case it may be as petty as just showing he can ram Hagel through knowing there was bound to be a lot of opposition to him and not just because of his views on Israel.”

Its all about the mannish boy flashing the middle finger at any and all who oppose his narcissistic dreams of his father.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pc8Wc1CN7sY

By: rickl

rickl — Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:30:17 +0000

Speaking of "unserious", here's a recent Bill Whittle video: Unserious People

By: Gary Rosen

Gary Rosen — Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:09:58 +0000

Some people have pointed out that it really doesn’t matter what Hagel’s views are, what matters are what Obama’s views are. While I’m hardly a fan of the Hagel nomination there is a sort of precedent for this. The Reagan administration was generally very pro-Israel, with one notable exception – Defense Secretary Casper Weinberger. Of course one big difference is that the Obama administration is *not* “generally very pro-Israel”.

Aside from Hagel’s views on Israel and the rest of foreign policy there is a more basic question – is he really the most qualified person for the job? Why didn’t Obama pick a more obvious candidate like say Wesley Clark? With Obama there is always a hidden agenda. In this case it may be as petty as just showing he can ram Hagel through knowing there was bound to be a lot of opposition to him and not just because of his views on Israel.

By: J.J. formerly Jimmy J.

J.J. formerly Jimmy J. — Tue, 08 Jan 2013 04:21:08 +0000

From Powerline:
“So far most of the critical discussion about Chuck Hagel for SecDef is that he said mean things about homosexuals, or is hostile to Israel, if not in fact anti-Semitic. So far I’m curious that people on the Left in particular are forgetting Hagel’s key role in derailing the egregious Kyoto Protocol in its infancy. He was the key person behind the “Byrd-Hagel” resolution in the Senate in 1997 denouncing the Kyoto treaty in the draft form that existed at the time. The Byrd-Hagel resolution was essentially a missile aimed at the Clinton administration that said Don’t even think of bringing this crap treaty to the Senate if it doesn’t include India and China. It passed by a vote of 97 – 0; think of who was included in that vote for this to happen—such prominent ‘climate deniers’ as Babs Boxer and John Kerry.”…………
………”I wonder if the environmentalists will say something cross about Hagel. Not everyone on the Left has forgotten this. The Daily Kos Kids have their knickers bunched up at least.”
http://tinyurl.com/asod9uy

Based on his successful efforts to kill Kyoto, I think he would make a great Energy Secretary. But of course we can’t have that. Obama is going to stop the rise of the seas this term.