Home » Dino-chick

Comments

Dino-chick — 21 Comments

  1. The very last thing I’d want to run into would be a 11 foot tall chicken. Anyone who’s been around chickens knows what I’m talking about.

  2. The paleontologist fail to answer the really profound question: What wine would be best served with grilled Oviraptor?

  3. So, which came first, the oviraptorosaur or the egg?

    (Thank you all, I’ll be here all week. Try the veal – and don’t forget to tip your waiter!)

  4. Well, they went extinct, so maybe they weren’t particularly good-looking to other oviraptorosaurs.

  5. Inference (i.e. creation of knowledge) has been the bane of scientific progress. Where it should serve as a guide, it has instead assumed a status to justify conclusions.

    Well, at least this latest discovery is based on a “partial skeleton”. Whereas as other discoveries were made from, in a more extreme case, extrapolation from a single tooth.

    Human beings are creatures with a predisposition for instant or immediate gratification. This character flaw is exacerbated in a civilized society, which grants us the time and resources for casual (i.e. dissociation of risk) speculation and fornication.

  6. “Though the team didn’t find direct evidence of feathers, the species was so closely related to birds that it was very likely covered in feathers that looked identical to those of modern birds.”

    Very likely, huh? Covered in feathers, huh? That (musta) looked identical to those of modern (huh?) birds?
    Speculation and artsy-fartsy fringe feathering ain’t real scientific. But never mind, just give them a new grant.

  7. I see that many commenters here are unduly sceptical about robustness of inference made on the basis of uncomplete skeletons. But such inferences are no way arbitrary, they are not random guesses but follow well developed methodology rooted in correlations of different body parts known since Cuvier. Such sciences as comparative anatomy, comparative embriology and morphology form the basis of paleontological reconstruction, and provide powerful tools of inference empirically tested on a huge body of factual knowledge.

  8. Of course these things were real, a long time ago and, when the Romans cut down too many trees for the Circus Magnum these Super-chicks helped adjust the environment by killing off the Romans and allowing the Visual-Goths and Van-Gouls and Italians to move in and thus upset the delicate balance of nature and of course all of the influx of invaders further upset the weather and the lack of true feathers caused the dino-birds to slow down and of course, they were killed off, not for their meat which tasted like greasy maggots but for their skin which made excellent XL stretch pants for the white female Botticelli.

  9. “excavated from the fossil-rich Hell Creek formation of South and North Dakota, starting in the late 1990s.”

    Here in Sioux Falls, they’re why we can’t slow down for the post-winter pot holes. You don’t want to stay still with these things feelin’ all protective and motherly about their eggs.

  10. I went to high school in South Dakota. It is so-o-o-o tempting to say something about the chicks I knew back then, but if I did, I’m sure I’d bring Neo’s wrath down upon me.

  11. An 11-foot chicken, probably with a very bad attitude? No, thanks. I once saw a ten-year old gringo boy get chased by an angry cassowary at a resort in Mexico. The kid thought it was funny since he managed to outrun the bird. But he also didn’t push his luck and molest it again that I saw. (Mexico is not as safety or lawsuit-conscious as the US, so the cassowary and a number of other exotic birds were walking around free on the resort’s grounds).

  12. Actually the most interesting observation about this “bird” is that it had no teeth. I was always under the assumption that dinosaurs were birds with teeth, now I am going to have to rethink my entire worldview.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>