Home » Twin twins

Comments

Twin twins — 4 Comments

  1. I had to google “superfetation” and found out -yet again- that things are stranger than I knew.

  2. I think in my day we would call them quadruplets. We know now that these were two sets of identicals but I wonder how many there have been in the past before anyone thought to call them two sets of twins instead of quadruplets?

  3. Ruth H:

    It’s possible, but IMHO highly unlikely. Identical twins look almost exactly alike, whereas fraternal twins (even of the same sex) look no more alike than ordinary siblings. It would be the highly unusual set of fraternal twins that would resemble each other strongly enough to be seen as identical.

    So, if a woman had identical quadruplets, that would certainly be noticeable and differentiated from fraternal quadruplets. But two sets of identical twins at the same time—that would tend to be noticeable and remarkable, too, and to be differentiated from either identical quadruplets (very rare incidence of 1 in 15 million) or some other combination of babies that would give four at the same time.

    It’s hard to figure out how common spontaneous conception (as opposed to assisted) of quadruplets used to be, but it certainly was very low as well. Here are some current facts:

    Spontaneous conception of quadruplets is rare. The MOST (Mothers of Super Twins) organization estimates the odds at 1 in 571,787 pregnancies. Most recent quadruplet births are the result of assisted reproductive techniques such as fertility enhancing drugs or in-vitro fertilization. Multiple Births Canada (MBC) estimates that 90% of quadruplet pregnancies are the result of fertility assistance.

    The site also says that 418 sets of quadruplets were born in 2005. If 90% of those were fertility-assisted, that means that only about 30 of them had been spontaneously conceived.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>