When is a big bad government shutdown not a big bad government shutdown? — 12 Comments
Of course. This shutdown is for the little guy, the working man, THE CHILDREN!!!
See, it is completely different hater.
Go senator Pocahontas. Filibuster for ‘the people’. Step up Pocahontas and derail HRC. Run, run, run Pocahontas and I’ll temporarily change my party affiliation so I can vote for you in the caucus.
Pro-choice or unprincipled positions are a foundation for anarchy.
Hillary is in trouble. You know that Obama gave his blessing to that many staffers supporting Warren.
When a prog like Warren wants to shut the government down it is “courageous.” When the Republicans do it, it is dangerous, treasonous, anarchistic, etc. So sayeth the MSM.
Senator Elizabeth Warren: hostage-taker, and terrorist.
> I’ll temporarily change my party affiliation so I can vote for you in the caucus.
You know, a lot of people gamed the system by voting for Obama against Hillary Clinton. That turned out really well. I’m not convinced Clinton would have been worse than Obama in 2008. She’s just as crooked and unprincipled, but I think she’s smarter, and wouldn’t have a problem with hiring competent people the way Obama does (although that doesn’t mean she would have).
I wouldn’t vote for Warren unless I were ready for a President Warren. Don’t say it couldn’t happen.
I’m more worried about Warren at this point than I am about Hillary. I think Hillary is past her sell-by date. Warren is not all that unattractive for a woman her age, and we all know that’s a major concern for many voters. Plus it’s an opportunity for another “historic first”.
Sarah Palin could derail that train, but the GOP establishment doesn’t like her any more than the Democrats do. Remember, she ran for governor on the platform of rooting out corruption in her own party. You think the national GOP wants anything to do with her?
I keep thinking of Firesign Theater’s brilliant comedy album “I Think We’re All Bozos On This Bus.”
Here’s the bit known as “the breaking of the President,” which you will get if you went to the 1964 World’s Fair, and especially if you did any computer programming the mainframe era:
The foregoing is offered by way of a mental palate-cleanser.
There is no way that, more than 300 hundred former Obama staffers write an open letter urging Elizabeth Warren to run for President in 2016 without Obama’s prior approval. That tells us that Obama will not be endorsing Hillary Clinton in 2015 (always unlikely). Instead, Obama will give Warren his extensive supporters list. He’ll direct lots of money into her coffers and lots of former Obama people will work on her Presidential campaign.
The democRat party is much more radical than it was even a generation ago and Warren has much more credibility with that crowd than does Clinton. While they’re both women, Clinton looks old, she’s not aging ‘gracefully’, while Warren looks reassuringly ‘mature’. And, wonder of wonders, faux that it is, she has native American ancestry! The importance that she’s only ‘partially’ white cannot be overstated and, in her mind where it really counts, she’s not white at all!
The primaries are determined by who can influence the base ($$$) and the democrat base likes Warren’s radicalism, not Clinton’s platitudes, much less her easily attacked record; Benghazi, she voted for the Iraq war… etc, etc.
Warren’s going to win the democrat primary battles and then she’ll present herself as a moderate to gain the low-info vote during the election campaign. The MSM will be totally behind her and will NOT report on her radicalism. When the right exposes it, it will be dismissed by the MSM as the rantings of racist sexists.
Clinton’s already lost before the contest even begins.
The meme will of course be that Warren is a WOMAN. Obviously the only motivation for not voting for her and instead voting for a racist republican is sexism. Ergo, anyone who doesn’t vote for a woman is a sexist. Go on, I dare you, prove you’re NOT a sexist pig.
Given the once again, developing GOP betrayal of its base, many more conservatives will stay home when the GOP nominates another RINO, which looks like either Romney, Jeb Bush or Chris Christy, ALL of whom have declared support for amnesty. Wisconsin’s Walker may run but is unlikely to get anything more than ‘polite’ GOP support.
Which means that Warren’s already got the election won, she just has to play out her hand. Blacks had their turn, it’s now time for a WOMAN, hear them roar!
Truly a case of, “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss”.
The aristocrats have sent their orders, all the peasants must now bow down and obey. And so they will.
Leave a Reply
HTML tags allowed in your
comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>
Of course. This shutdown is for the little guy, the working man, THE CHILDREN!!!
See, it is completely different hater.
Go senator Pocahontas. Filibuster for ‘the people’. Step up Pocahontas and derail HRC. Run, run, run Pocahontas and I’ll temporarily change my party affiliation so I can vote for you in the caucus.
Pro-choice or unprincipled positions are a foundation for anarchy.
Hypocrisy, thy name is ‘liberality’.
“300 Former Obama Staffers Urge Elizabeth Warren to Run for President”
Hillary is in trouble. You know that Obama gave his blessing to that many staffers supporting Warren.
When a prog like Warren wants to shut the government down it is “courageous.” When the Republicans do it, it is dangerous, treasonous, anarchistic, etc. So sayeth the MSM.
Senator Elizabeth Warren: hostage-taker, and terrorist.
> I’ll temporarily change my party affiliation so I can vote for you in the caucus.
You know, a lot of people gamed the system by voting for Obama against Hillary Clinton. That turned out really well. I’m not convinced Clinton would have been worse than Obama in 2008. She’s just as crooked and unprincipled, but I think she’s smarter, and wouldn’t have a problem with hiring competent people the way Obama does (although that doesn’t mean she would have).
I wouldn’t vote for Warren unless I were ready for a President Warren. Don’t say it couldn’t happen.
I’m more worried about Warren at this point than I am about Hillary. I think Hillary is past her sell-by date. Warren is not all that unattractive for a woman her age, and we all know that’s a major concern for many voters. Plus it’s an opportunity for another “historic first”.
Sarah Palin could derail that train, but the GOP establishment doesn’t like her any more than the Democrats do. Remember, she ran for governor on the platform of rooting out corruption in her own party. You think the national GOP wants anything to do with her?
I keep thinking of Firesign Theater’s brilliant comedy album “I Think We’re All Bozos On This Bus.”
Here’s the bit known as “the breaking of the President,” which you will get if you went to the 1964 World’s Fair, and especially if you did any computer programming the mainframe era:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5x2xBa8p0A
The foregoing is offered by way of a mental palate-cleanser.
There is no way that, more than 300 hundred former Obama staffers write an open letter urging Elizabeth Warren to run for President in 2016 without Obama’s prior approval. That tells us that Obama will not be endorsing Hillary Clinton in 2015 (always unlikely). Instead, Obama will give Warren his extensive supporters list. He’ll direct lots of money into her coffers and lots of former Obama people will work on her Presidential campaign.
The democRat party is much more radical than it was even a generation ago and Warren has much more credibility with that crowd than does Clinton. While they’re both women, Clinton looks old, she’s not aging ‘gracefully’, while Warren looks reassuringly ‘mature’. And, wonder of wonders, faux that it is, she has native American ancestry! The importance that she’s only ‘partially’ white cannot be overstated and, in her mind where it really counts, she’s not white at all!
The primaries are determined by who can influence the base ($$$) and the democrat base likes Warren’s radicalism, not Clinton’s platitudes, much less her easily attacked record; Benghazi, she voted for the Iraq war… etc, etc.
Warren’s going to win the democrat primary battles and then she’ll present herself as a moderate to gain the low-info vote during the election campaign. The MSM will be totally behind her and will NOT report on her radicalism. When the right exposes it, it will be dismissed by the MSM as the rantings of racist sexists.
Clinton’s already lost before the contest even begins.
The meme will of course be that Warren is a WOMAN. Obviously the only motivation for not voting for her and instead voting for a racist republican is sexism. Ergo, anyone who doesn’t vote for a woman is a sexist. Go on, I dare you, prove you’re NOT a sexist pig.
Given the once again, developing GOP betrayal of its base, many more conservatives will stay home when the GOP nominates another RINO, which looks like either Romney, Jeb Bush or Chris Christy, ALL of whom have declared support for amnesty. Wisconsin’s Walker may run but is unlikely to get anything more than ‘polite’ GOP support.
Which means that Warren’s already got the election won, she just has to play out her hand. Blacks had their turn, it’s now time for a WOMAN, hear them roar!
Truly a case of, “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss”.
The aristocrats have sent their orders, all the peasants must now bow down and obey. And so they will.