Home » Connecting the dots with the Charlie Hebdo terrorists

Comments

Connecting the dots with the Charlie Hebdo terrorists — 12 Comments

  1. Let’s see. Aggressive non-assimilation, apartheid, extra-territorial enclaves (no go zones), cultural supremacism, social intolerance, inferiority angst, grievance mongering, psychopathic misogyny, female genital mutilation, honor killing, gay, Jew, and kafir (blacks) hatred; censorship, violence, antipathy to science, education, invention, art, music, free will, creation, and God; anhedonic in all aspects of the pleasures of life excepting barbaric cruelty; pretensions to religion, demands for religious freedom and protections while denying same to all others; and known ties to other terrorists, along with indictments and convictions for attempted terrorism. Dots! What dots? You see dots? Islamophobe.

  2. Why is it so hard to regard people like this as ticking time bombs who must be deported (if non-citizens), watched like hawks if they haven’t yet committed a crime and are citizens, or put away for a long, long, long time if they have committed one*?

    Do you not realize that the Leftist alliance and Islamic Jihad are allies? Why would they put their reliable votes and cultural invasion force in jail? They can’t rape the culture or take it over, then, nor can they vote for socialist parties. What would be the point of importing them in to fight a race war against the locals, from the Left’s pov?

  3. At the BBC: Charlie Hebdo attack: A French intelligence failure?

    It’s by a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute and worth a read. It basically says the answer isn’t clear-cut. One thing that struck me was this:

    We might also ask whether French authorities and their foreign counterparts, especially those in Yemen and the US, shared intelligence that might, taken together, have thrown up insight that the individual portions could not.

    One report suggests that France de-prioritised the Kouachi brothers because Yemen was a US priority, whereas American officials left it to the French. France, it should be remembered, is not a member of the US-led Five Eyes intelligence alliance.

    That sounds so pre-9/11. Very worrisome.

  4. Why isn’t it a felony to associate with or support known terrorist groups. A very long mandatory sentence to a prison that served pork would perhaps act as a bit of a deterrent.

  5. One other connection I saw mentioned this morning on CNN: Said Kouachi, who was studying Arabic grammar, shared a small apartment with the ‘underwear bomber’ Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab for one to two weeks in Sanaa, the capital of Yemen.

    http://preview.tinyurl.com/m6e2c3b

    Guess we can stop it with the claims that each of the attacks are just crazed lone wolves.

  6. or put away for a long, long, long time if they have committed one

    10% of the French are Muslim. And 60% of the jailed in France are Muslim. Finishing school.

  7. Ymarsakar:

    Yes, I realize the left would be completely against my suggestions. But the left is not the majority in this country—not yet, anyway.

  8. But the left is not the majority in this country–not yet, anyway.

    The way the Left works is via infiltration, at best, and slaughter via totalitarian force later. So all it takes is that the leaders be corrupted. The people may just be clueless, they don’t actually matter much in the strategic level.

    Currently the Left has almost total control of the police unions, the teacher’s unions, and so forth. There was the AFL CIO merge, I believe, which appointed certain new leaders. Those new leaders were Leftists, primarily. It took some years for them to get the police departments militarized, corrupt, and more incompetent, with the help of DHS, so the solution is ongoing for control.

    It will only get harder to enforce law and order, because the Left plays both sides of the fence. They support the criminals in order to obtain a pretext to control the police forces. They make the police forces crush the insurgents, in order to promote more criminal passion. They benefit from such. The same strategy is used with Islam, they promote Islamic violence and then use the backlash to stomp down on Christians and Jews.

    This makes it harder to enforce law and order.

    The Gaystapo, another Leftist faction, goes around looking for baker discrimination against gay weddings. IN order to heighten the differences and freeze people personally, so that they take damage.

  9. Neo: “you’ll end up wondering, as the author of the article does, how they could possibly have slipped through the radar screen”

    Structural limitation. The difference between a law enforcement approach to terrorism and a counter-terrorism approach to terrorism is the difference between prosecution and prevention.

    A succinct explanation is provided here by a retired CSIS agent (Canadian equivalent of the CIA) who investigated the 1985 Air India 182 attack:
    http://youtu.be/yS_4ZNa1ByI?t=16m30s

    Like the Paris attack, the Air India 182 perpetrators were known and under surveillance.

    The whole documentary (1:30 long) provides useful insight on the difficulty of counter-terrorism, more so the law enforcement approach to counter-terrorism.

  10. Some Americans did tell the anti war profiteers and the Europeans that fighting terrorists in the ME would be better than the alternatives. It looks like people refuse to believe things when it is easy for them. They’ll have to deal with the consequences now when it is harder.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>