Home » One of the Iran “side deals”

Comments

One of the Iran “side deals” — 6 Comments

  1. Obama found a flaw in the treaty-approval system and he attacked in that soft and vulnerable spot.

    obama couldnt find his own shadow on a sunny day.. when did he do the analysis? when on the basketball court or when he bumped into bill clinton on the golf course? or was it during one of those multimillion dollar vacations the has gone on our dime?

    sorry… but this is akin to the lion of the senate dems getting help from the KGB to act against ronald reagan…

    he did not attack that or think that, he is a puppet… not a political idiot savant who cant talk but can do 43 dimensional chess to figure that out.

    he is following a script and other stuff from people passing strategy who are wll connected and off the radar… they are connected to external organs of other states who ARE and have been doing such analysis since about 1945…

    Ted Kennedy’s Soviet Gambit
    http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/27/ted-kennedy-soviet-union-ronald-reagan-opinions-columnists-peter-robinson.html

    Composed in 1983 by Victor Chebrikov, the top man at the KGB, the memorandum was addressed to Yuri Andropov, the top man in the entire USSR. The subject: Sen. Edward Kennedy.

    “On 9-10 May of this year,” the May 14 memorandum explained, “Sen. Edward Kennedy’s close friend and trusted confidant [John] Tunney was in Moscow.” (Tunney was Kennedy’s law school roommate and a former Democratic senator from California.) “The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov.”

    Kennedy’s message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election.

    unlike then, the borders are open, the communications are open, people have their own email servers and they can also chat behind closed doors..

    so give me a break…

    there are two ways to manage.
    one is to hire people who are more competant than yourself and pay them well and be very competent.

    the other way is to lift up morons or people who are unable to do the job, run interference for them, and they become servants to you as they cant do anything without that connection!!!

    obama and so many Dems are the latter… complete sell outs who have to do what they are told to prevent the skeletons of their own closets to be let out and unguarded from action.

    its that simple… if they are elected they are not the sharpest crayons in the box, but are the most servile sell outs who can be bought or placed because of the dirt… from barney to clinton.. .
    [edited for length by n-n]

  2. Artfldgr:

    You are underestimating Obama immensely, and in addition you continue to misunderstand something I’ve specifically addressed time and again—to you.

    Let me clarify one more time, and I hope it’s the last time I need to do this: when I write that Obama did this or that, or thought or planned this or that, if I meant he did it or thought it all by himself I would write that. I have often stated that he has advisors and is a man of the left. I have also stated that he is intelligent and not just a puppet, and that he is also makes decisions and has input into those decisions. His is not a solo effort, but he is not just a puppet—he and his confederates are probably on the same page most of the time.

    I don’t have time to go into the full explanation every time I write about what Obama has done. Nor do I think it is necessary. But no, he is not some sort of brilliant maverick: he is a man of the left. His greatest gift is in hiding his true nature successfully and selling himself to the American people, but he certainly does not do that alone.

    Of course Obama & Co. knew exactly what they were doing re whether the Iran deal would be a treaty or not. It was not a treaty, it was an executive agreement, and he knew that would hold up.

    I’ve written about his (and their) strategy on this many many times before. I’m not going to go into the details again, but some of them are here. His approach was clear quite some times ago; see this and this (the latter stating that even back in October it was clear that the plan was to avoid Congress and not label the deal a treaty).

  3. Stepping back to allow neo to slice and dice the brilliant, but mostly obsessive artflgr.

  4. BHO has long realized that as long as a ‘thing’ can be morphed into some sort of EO or presidentially exclusive decision — he’s good-to-go.

    Hence, certain phrasings are to be shunned: “TREATY” “Declaration of War” ( cf Libya )

    Other phrases are to be embraced: “Duty to Protect” — but these are are art of language.

    Inside their velvet grift -is the raw menace of BHO’s deconstruction of America.

    He simply knows that every time he flips the script – he!! follows in his wake.

    Think of it as his personal jihad.

  5. The God King Hussein Obola has declared A Great Holy War against the infidels called American patriots and anti Leftist counter revolutionary forces!

  6. His is not a solo effort, but he is not just a puppet–he and his confederates are probably on the same page most of the time.

    Hitler and Stalin’s regimes are a good example. So would Mao’s cultural revolution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>