Home » On the seventh anniversary of FredHJr’s death

Comments

On the seventh anniversary of FredHJr’s death — 22 Comments

  1. I remember FredHJr with gratitude. I learned so much from him. Others too, but he was special

  2. Neo,

    Thanks for the annual reminder. It’s simply remarkable that it has already been seven years!

    My continued best wishes to his family.

  3. Before my time here, but so, so right about Moscow and Tehran.

    Obama’s real foreign policy legacy will be when Iran tests its nukes in about three years. I only hope Barack finds out about it after his golf game with the CEO of Boeing. Terrible deal for world security but Boeing sold Iran some jets.

  4. I, too, remember FredHJr, strcpy and Occam’s Beard. The comment section here is the best I’ve seen for consistency and quality.

  5. Thanks for the memorial to FredHJr, neo. Those comments by him are pure gold. Incredible insight. Would that we had such wisdom in our government.

    FredHJr and I had many similar thoughts about the 2008 financial crisis and “Porkulus.” It was nice to know I was in such good company on those issues.

    RIP, FredHJr, and may his family be comforted by their memories of him.

    Now that I’m getting closer to “Flying West,” (I may have one year, or ten, but I can definitely see the end of the runway now) I have left instructions that neo and some other blog masters be informed. I’ve been commenting here since the days of your podcasts with Shrinkwrapped and Sigmund, Carl, and Alfred. I won’t just disappear. 🙂

  6. FredHJr:
    “To me, Moscow is the epicenter now of the totalitarian forces and alliances within our civilization.”

    Based on his stated foreign policy views, Trump is Moscow’s US presidential candidate.

  7. I remember Fred well. We were about the same age, had very different histories regarding the Left (he was once a part of it, I never was), but ended up with very similar points of view. His comments were always thought-provoking and remarkable in their clarity. RIP, Fred.

  8. Neo, thank you for keeping Fred’s memory alive here. As one of the other commenters mentioned here, the quality of comments on this site are the best amongst the various blogs I follow. Fred was a great example of the wisdom to be found in the common man. The “expert” talking heads we see ad nauseum today don’t hold a candle to an honest man with common sense.

  9. Janet Says:
    June 26th, 2016 at 7:48 pm
    …Fred was a great example of the wisdom to be found in the common man. The “expert” talking heads we see ad nauseum today don’t hold a candle to an honest man with common sense.
    * * *
    Some of the disruption in society / politics here and in Britain is, I believe, a result of the honest men finally realizing that the experts have been selling them a bill of goods, at best, and down the river, at worst, for a very , very long time.

  10. I was thinking about this idea of not knowing what happens to people on the Internet. I think it is somewhat unique. Even in the days of pen pals who never meet, you usually could expect to find out if something happened to them.

    On the Internet, it is sometimes literally, “here today, gone tomorrow” with no further explanation forthcoming.

  11. Eric Says: “To me, Moscow is the epicenter now of the totalitarian forces and alliances within our civilization.”

    Based on his stated foreign policy views, Trump is Moscow’s US presidential candidate.

    Leave it to a Libtard to take a respectful column of a human being that has touched our lives and make it a political jab :-(.
    Of course given dear leader’s “good intentions” and Hildabeast’s desire for “pay for play” speeches and donations to the foundation’s slush fund, I’m sure their decisions will be “pure” as the driven snow.
    Trump is not my first choice but he isn’t guilty of leaving Americans to die in Bengazi or giving Iran the “bomb”.

    One last question Eric, since this is a column about FredHjr-
    Do you really think he would choose Hildabeast over Trump?
    I think not.

  12. “I think the beginning of the end of our civilization began with the French Revolution and The Terror. It was the beginning of the elaboration of totalitarian thought and throughout the 19th century this kept on finding newer permutations of elegant, intellectual terror. The 20th century was the culmination of the barbarity of totalitarianism.”

    I think that that is an especially important observation about which we need to be periodically reminded. Especially now that many of our politicians are more enthralled by the French Revolution and it’s predicates, than our own.

    You have of course dealt with this in the past: even contrasting their national slogan with our own Lockean statement of fundamental rights and interests.

  13. I usually have a few names going on different sites at any given time. There aren’t many sites that merit loyalty. I think we’ve moved out of a Golden Age of internet communication – actually, gold-plated at best, but there was a little gold. Facebook diminished the anonymity of the internet, then Twitter rewarded the briefest and the worst. There aren’t many salons left.

    The most frustrating part of it is the loss of relationships, however casual they may be. Then again, is it right to call a relationship “casual” when you spend days talking about philosophy and culture, politics and art? The best you can do, I guess, is to respect other people’s personal privacy if they approach you on an anonymous blog. It’s weird, though.

  14. The astuteness and prescience of those comments is impressive. FredHjr nailed many aspects of the forces on the Left. I would only express reservations about Moscow being the current epicenter of the Left. IMO, the ideology of the Left metastasized after the fall of the Soviet Union. Having spread across the world during the Soviet Union’s time, it is now a disparate network of aligned interests, rather than a centralized ideology…

  15. RIP to all good people who take the last exit from our lives. They live on through our memories. We too shall pass as all things pass someday. Our lives are best measured by how the living remember us.

  16. However long I’m absent, I always de-lurk to comment on the annual remembrance, as it’s also a reminder to all of us still around how wonderful our little haven and its proprietress are.

    I arrived here shortly after Fred’s passing, but I did know strcpy (who was, as I recall, a young man, making his likely death from cancer all the more tragic), and Occam’s Beard, whose blunt, sometimes endearingly curmudgeonly witticisms and observations were a big part of what made this place so uniquely attractive to me.

    It’s such a noble thing for neo to keep their memories alive – each in his unique way an embodiment of what makes America special (as another commenter said, “ordinary people with common sense”).

    God rest.

  17. MikeII:
    “One last question Eric, since this is a column about FredHjr-
    Do you really think he would choose Hildabeast over Trump?
    I think not.”

    FredHJr would have recognized immediately that Trump’s rhetoric is consistent with Russian propaganda.

    Based on his comments, I believe FredHJr would choose neither Clinton nor Trump with the grim recognition that both the presumptive GOP and Dems presidential candidates, and more significantly, their contextual social activist movements, to be sides of the same dis-civic coin.

    Based on his comments, FredHJr evidently understood the big picture and long view that the activist game is the only social cultural/political game there is.

    The current challenge to America the leader of the free world would have been a crystalline moment for FredHJr. I believe he would have understood the epochal crossroads that We The People now face.

    As such, I believe FredHJr would have advocated for American conservative and liberal patriots to rally collectively for a viable 3rd option with a competitive activist awakening to save our country and the civilization that depends on our Shining City upon a Hill from both intolerable options – again, more than Trump and Clinton the individual candidates, but their contextual toxic social activist movements to which FredHJr, based on his comments, was evidently sensitized.

    I’m curious – because Neo hasn’t quoted it – whether FredHJr advocated prescription beyond his worthy diagnosis.

    Generally speaking, conservative intellectuals, including Neo, are sharp with diagnosis but also tend to fall short on prescription due to their ingrained aversion to the practical activism that’s necessary to compete for real in the arena versus social activist movements like the Democrat-front Left and Left-mimicking Trump-front alt-Right.

  18. Add: In other words, I believe FredHJr would have been #NeverTrump and #NeverHillary. He would not have impotently bent his knee and bowed his head in submissive compromise.

    The question – again, unanswered by Neo’s quotes of him – is whether FredHJr would have undertaken the social activism that’s practically necessary to solve the problem, inspired by and consistent with the Founding Fathers’ essential activism that won our nation via competition in the arena, as much he’s inspired by their ideal aspirations.

  19. I think what FredH would do is up to FredH, even dead.

    Unless you have a power to ask a soul without a physical body a question, the issue is no longer in the political arena.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>