Home » Kissinger on Trump

Comments

Kissinger on Trump — 16 Comments

  1. Kissinger was hated by the left because he knew the perils of the Communist states. Not so much that he wanted a hot war with the USSR or China, but that he knew they could easily blow the world up. I would guess that having seen the devastation of WWII and having a first class intellect he could see how easily disaster could strike. His wannabe successor Brzezinski lacked Kissinger’s longer term insights. Perhaps he sees that by gentle flattery to Trump, Donald might be inspired to actually want to be seen as a wise leader and work at the job.

  2. Fascinating Neo. So often we never see past the public person. Kissinger certainly had a richer past than I realized.

    When I thought of Kissinger, the Statesman, Von Bismarck always came to mind. To me he embodied the quintessential pragmatist; a practitioner of Realpolitik.

    After reading of how lightly he wielded uncommon power as a young man, I wonder if I underestimated his moral sense. Then again, maybe that was merely an early manifestation of his pragmatism. Whether inherent or because the way he evolved, I viewed the mature Statesman as rather amoral in his dealings; and that could be an unavoidable trait in the world of power diplomacy.

  3. I met Kissinger’s younger brother, Walter, a few months ago. Nice man and he too has aged very gracefully. Definitely some good Methuselah genes there.

  4. Had Kissinger disapproved of “opening up China” and prevailed upon Nixon to abandon the idea, would we today be better off with a China still enmeshed in third world status?

    Pragmatism, grounded in short term considerations can lead to long term consequences that might have been avoided.

  5. [q]Geoffrey Britain Says:
    December 20th, 2016 at 5:41 pm
    Had Kissinger disapproved of “opening up China” and prevailed upon Nixon to abandon the idea, would we today be better off with a China still enmeshed in third world status? [/q]

    Seems to me, several other countries have created more problems for the USA than China. At least lately. They do steal our tech though.

    They haven’t created any maniacs to come blow us up.

  6. GB, our Red China policy went south with H.W. Bush 41 and a certain square in Beijing.

    It’s never recovered.

  7. With Kissinger, and many others, there is the good and the less than good. I do not presume to judge HK.

  8. Oh phooey! I am ceaselessly amazed at how many people on the internet consider themselves qualified to criticize almost every action of the people who actually make decisions and carry out policy.

    Let me go on record. I consider George H. W. Bush to be one of the finest men this country has produced–in every respect. Few have served the country more selflessly, and in so many positions of great responsibility–not to mention personal peril when he was hardly more than a boy. I consider Nixon, for all of his obvious faults, to be one of the premiere strategic thinkers of our time. I consider Kissinger to be a genius. I also believe that all of these men acted in what they considered the best interests of the country, based on the information they had, and the circumstances they faced.

  9. Another fascinating biopic, Neo! Thank you.

    Krefeld… let me see. Have to get out my map for this one, because I don’t remember exactly where it’s situated. Oh! Up by Duisburg. I’ve probably been there, but I can’t remember what for. Maybe I just passed through on the train once.

    Interesting about his connection to Fé¼rth, since I passed through there numerous times on my way between Nuremberg and Erlangen.

  10. By the way, I learned a bunch of things from reading Kissinger’s Wiki entry that I’d never known before about his history. His family left Germany in 1938 when he was about 15, just in time to avoid the worst.

    Kissinger graduated from George Washington High in upper Manhattan from the same class as the mother of a childhood friend. She didn’t know Kissinger in high school, though she could show us his picture in her high school yearbook.

    Kissinger last served in office FORTY YEARS AGO, but he is still listened to.

    His time in the Army shows that at for all the jokes about the Army, it is also capable of making use of the best abilities of at least some recruits. He had a very impressive record in the Army as a mere private.

  11. groundhog,

    Other than the obvious, what motive might China have for its military buildup and explorations into militarizing space?

    Oldflyer,

    Are you really suggesting that we should refrain from examining and discussing the consequences of the decisions of our betters?

    As a general rule, never forget that they put their pants on, one leg at a time, just like you and I. Intelligence and wisdom are entirely separate qualities and all three of the men you cite made profound mistakes. That we could do no better and almost certainly would do worse absolves them not in the least from having their actions reflected upon.

  12. Geoffrey Britain – the obvious of course — but it’s also not possible to argue that large nations, even peaceful ones engage in plenty of offensive capabilities.

    Failure to be in the game on land, air, sea, and space is to be more vulnerable than someone who is. Offensive capabilities like our nuclear weapons, are actually considered defensive by us. But that doesn’t mean everyone sees it that way.

  13. Even during his time in office he was informed about the team’s results by the German Embassy every Monday morning.

    Only a trivial observation, but this was life before the internet. Very simple information required good contacts and diplomatic cables. How much we take for granted, and how quickly.

  14. Great post on a significant Secretary of State. I immediately recalled that he was an intellectual rival of Sam Huntington :
    “Roughly contemporary, as a Harvard graduate student in security studies, with Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski, Huntington failed to achieve their spectacular level of success in Washington, although he did rise to a second-tier position in the National Security Council under President Jimmy Carter. His intellectual achievements, by way of compensation, have far out-stripped those of his peers. His immensely influential Political Order in Changing Societies (1968), in particular, established his reputation as a leading authority on state-building.”
    <<

    Actually, this whole '97 page seems more relevant than Kissinger's fine interview idea that Trump has "an extraordinary opportunity".

    Sam H thought:
    ‘The West’s victory in the Cold War has produced not triumph but exhaustion.’ We have lost not only our ‘self-confidence’ but also our ‘will to dominate’. American society is marked by self-indulgence, a wasting work ethic, raging criminality, antisocial behaviour, disrespect for authority, drug use, family breakdown, poor educational performance and a general erosion of personal trust.
    <<

    Kind of funny to see PC dictators as having a lot of "will to dominate", while supporting most of the ills being warned against.

    And maybe Trump can help stop the rot (tho I remain with low expectations.)
    I hope for that change.

  15. GB, examine and criticize all you want. On the other hand I will comment on the criticism as I feel it warranted.

    I think my point stemmed from unsubstantiated speculation that if the opening to China had not occurred, then such and such would have happened, or not happened. Pure second guessing about the unknowable. Same with the peace agreement with N. Vietnam. Pure speculation as to motive and outcome. What if Congress had not pulled the rug from under the South? Don’t think that was even mentioned.

    These developments were used to inclulde rather gratuitous swipes at Nixon and G.W.H. Bush in a posting that was essentially about the life of Kissinger. Kind of a stretch. Finally, although I never watched them put their pants on, I accept your speculative assertion about how they went about it; even if it is a non sequitor.

    But, everyone has their own opinion and should be allowed to express it–if Neo so pleases.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>