Home » Law enforcement and the new suspect in the Berlin market attack

Comments

Law enforcement and the new suspect in the Berlin market attack — 18 Comments

  1. The first step in changing such an outrageous situation: in future, a “duldung” will only be issued if the person receiving it will be housed by the person issuing it. That might change such a shocking travesty of justice.

  2. I always thought the Inspector Clouseau character was fictional. Apparently not.

    It’s obvious that European law enforcement is reactive and seemingly soft on suspected terrorists. Also, they seem to have no intelligence that allows law enforcement to understand in real time who they have in custody.

    They don’t seem to take the terrorist threat all that seriously. At some point I suppose they will become enraged enough by the senseless violence to take more proactive measures to defend themselves.

    James Mitchell’s book, “Enhanced interrogation,” ought to be required reading for all policymakers and law enforcement. Being nice or fair to the jihadis only increases their contempt for infidels. Only by understanding them and taking them seriously can a realistic defense be mounted.

  3. European attitude to terrorism is nothing short of suicidal. Just as all their social policies, too. And in Germany all this insanity is especially bad.

  4. Leftists in the West are going to allow more deaths to pile up before a solid majority of the voters throw them out of office.

  5. Applying that old formula of “If the INTENT were to {achieve result X} what would they be doing differently?”, one might decide that THIS IS INTENTIONAL ON THE PART OF THE GLOBALISTS.

    The primary function of government is to protect its citizenry from threats external and internal. Defend the borders, ensure the civil peace, enforce the law, that sort of thing.

    When a government follows policies that foment chaos and civil discord, that cause economic damage, and/or otherwise are injurious to the welfare of its citizens, and KEEPS DOING SO despite the harm being done, it has become treasonous and illegitimate. Period. (Look up “Social Contract”.)

    The West, the so-called “First World”, is UNIVERSALLY engaged in such malfeasance against its citizens. The various national governments are DELIBERATELY destabilizing their own states: they invite non-assimilating foreigners in, they adopt rules (or at least “social pressure & propaganda”) to discourage their native populations from complaining about the economic cost and civil unrest the “new guests” bring, they deny that borders or national culture-and-customs or patriotism have any valid reason to exist; further, they allow their central banks to follow economic policies that GUARANTEE an eventual global economic collapse.

    If they really had any concern for their citizens, their countries, civil cohesiveness and/or the public welfare; if they valued the continuation of Civilization-as-we-know-it, WHY would they double-down and keep on following such destructive policies?

    I can’t say for certain that Total Destruction Of The West is their conscious, deliberate goal.

    But if such Destruction WERE their goal: WHAT WOULD THEY BE DOING DIFFERENTLY????

  6. The documents are a taunt to the German authorities.

    They weren’t left behind by accident.

    This jihadi WANTED the world to know of him.

  7. This is Fabian socialism, the Fabian window depicts it succinctly.
    Two blacksmiths are at a forge working intently, they are working on an image of planet earth engulfed in flames with the comment, *re make it to your hearts desire*.
    Also ask yourself why Obama is releasing all these criminals ???
    Gotta get those fires burning !

  8. PC Germany, Merkel paid a visit to the site with what appeared to be fellow useless pols, I m surprised it wasnt delayed a day for Hollande to get there. Note there appeared to be No Clergy person in attendance.

  9. It’s not law enforcement failing to do their duty so much as the asylum laws that won’t permit them to hold a person unless he is charged with a crime. Any attempt to change these laws is met by lots of resistance, and not from Merkel’s party. You have lots of do-gooders from other parties that get lots of airtime to preen about their superior morality.

  10. Other than the obvious refusal to face reality, European political authorities view jihadist terrorism as a police problem. In which case, until they break a law, they can’t be detained, much less arrested. We BTW have the exact same, repeatedly demonstrated problem here in America.

    A_Nonny_Mouse,

    They simply take the view that you can’t make an omelet without breaking some eggs…

  11. “inept” means not doing the right thing according to the rules, protocols, regulations, and procedures through being stupid.
    This is a matter of doing things exactly as laid out in the rules, protocols, regulations and procedures. German law enforcement was operating exactly on point. There is nothing to reproach in their work.
    The problem is both the laws and the social pressures impinging on their work. It’s not as if they were Brit cops allowing the Rotherham atrocity to go on for ten years in fear of being accused of islamophobia. Those guys avoiding doing things the right way.
    The Germans did all they were required/allowed to do at their various levels.

    Also, as with the Boston bombing and other events, the injured outnumber the dead by a substantial factor. There is a tendency to pass over “injured” without recalling, as in Boston, amputations, irreparable internal injuries, blindings, and similar life-changing and life-limiting traumas. This wasn’t just so and so many dead and….something something.

  12. There is an eye-opening article by Andrew McCarthy on the National Review website that I encountered on the Real Clear Politics website.

    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/443268/germany-islamist-enclaves-europe-jihad-terrorism-problem-growing

    His message is that the danger we face is largely a product of jihadist enclaves, which he defines as assimilation-resistant zones in which terrorists can develop and be sheltered by the sympathetic. He cites specific examples where even German police fear to tread.

  13. Stubbs,
    This is absolutely correct. A lot of te problem comes from 2nd and 3rd generation immigrants who are frustrated. Their faters still raise them in a strong man of the house manner and don’t really give them a role model or permission to assimilate. The fathers often don’t take education seriously and don’t teach their sons to value it. The children will often be forced to marry a relative from the home country that they don’t even know so testosterone filled guys don’t learn to see girls as friends or possible future mates. Their is a lot of frustration in these young people that can be acted on by radicals.

    What needs to be said to immigrants is that they are responsible for bringing their kids to or having their kids in the West. It is their responsibility to help them live here. They cannot project their memories of how life used to be in the homeland when they were young onto kids who are now growing up in the age of smartphones and videogames.

  14. Sex is genetic. Gender is a behavioral bias closely correlated with sex. All that the child knows is that their bias differs from others of the same sex. Whether it has a homosexual or crossover orientation, the current transgender “treatment” selects a preferred social gender, rather than the conventional “treatment” that selects a gender correlated with the biological sex.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>