Home » The new blog site: an unveiling

Comments

The new blog site: an unveiling — 49 Comments

  1. It would be nice if the font in the section about why the apple was the same as the font used in the rest of your new site.

  2. Neo wrote, ” One of the main reasons I want to change over is that the name “neocon” has led to misunderstandings and also that I’m not such a “new” conservative, although I want to keep “neo” because that’s become my nickname.”

    Response: I can understand that. I remember you having to explain repeatedly.

    Q’s and A’s
    1) Yes. Text darkness is good there and here.
    4) Not nested is my preference but others may disagree.
    6) oooohhh yes – a like button.
    8) I like that option. I’ve seen it on Sistah Toldjah’s blog and it helps drive RESPONSES 🙂
    9) No. I won’t connect my social media because people here in CA are hateful.

    Hope this helps. 🙂

  3. IE 11 sandboxed with Sandboxie – both videos seemed the same. I didn’t see a difference.

    Opera 51.0 no sandbox – both videos seemed the same. I couldnt’ tell a difference

  4. Overall, I like it. It’s easier for my middle aged eyes to read on my cell phone.

    I really wouldn’t like to HAVE to cut Facebook. I’m still somewhat closeted on Facebook. (I kind of like some of my idiot progressive friends. Plus, I still get to see what it is they’re thinking.)

  5. I do like your new site, the NEO in that neat font does the job just fine. It is an easy to read site and in appearance it is crisp and clean. Thank you and now I guess you are good for another decade or two.

  6. 1. darkness is ok
    2. either name is fine
    3. there is no three on your list!
    4. I prefer non-nested since you only have to locate the last comment you read and then continue on. I have seen a reply to the first comment which essentially hi-jacks the thread. Also, depending on the depth of nesting, the readability gets weird, i.e. one to two words per line.
    5. a date is fine, no need to time stamp if you can’t figure it out.
    6. the like feature is good, since you can just up vote instead of having to comment “yes, I like what you said.” But, do you need the recent comments on the sidebar?
    7. fonts are ok
    8. I usually ignore the follow-up option since my inbox on email is crowded enough and I check your blog on a regular basis. I think it also encourages faster and nastier reactions when two people are having a comment fight. See LI for examples.
    9. I don’t use social media to comment, but I am also someone who will log off computers for a week or two to relax.
    10.either version is ok

    I checked the new version on my kindle fire – it fills up the screen but I cannot enlarge the size of the letters. I only need that if I need to hit a particular spot to get a link.

    I like the archives being on a drop down menu, can you do that with the categories? If you don’t then the recent comments and recent posts widgets will be way down on the page.

  7. I agree with all of Baklava’s comments, including that I couldn’t see an appreciable difference in the two videos (maybe it’s my monitor?).

    I would only add that I find the font on this, the original site, to be more readable, but freely acknowledge that that might just be because I’ve become set in my ways and accustomed to the ‘look’ here (at the original site).

    Regarding the dropping of the “neocon” part of your moniker, I can see the wisdom of this change (plus I think you actually come across as more of a mainstream conservative thinker – a ‘classical liberal’ – than a textbook, William Kristol-style Neocon anyway. However, your Change story is VERY compelling and I’ve always thought that it might be quite persuasive to any wavering liberals who drop by out of idle curiosity or as the result of a link. And I, for one, have always thought that your Change story is a great marketing or branding “hook”. Plus it resonates with the unstated (unconscious?) associations with the Matrix storyline (the name “Neo”, the Change, see Reality, the “red pill”)… or is that crazy? Anyway, if you can figure out how to continue to put your Change story in a prominent, eye-catching place, I think it would be continuing good promotion of your ‘brand’.

    Just my $0.02….

  8. My vision isn’t what it used to be, so I could stand a slightly larger font and I don’t like the idea of using Facebook for comments. Our local paper went to it for LTE comments. It’s slow and doesn’t always work properly, plus we lost some participants that aren’t members and won’t join.

    I like NEO.

  9. Darkness and font are fine. I prefer non-nested comments. Like the Like button. Prefer Neo to Neocon. Datestamps are unimportant to me. Twitter, Facebook, and I suppose all other social media are dead to me so commenting through those vehicles is too. Both videos look the same to me on iPhone.

  10. Just to clarify: the Facebook comments thing wouldn’t change anything about the old way of commenting. That would stay the same. No one would be forced to use the Facebook method. It would simply add some alternative methods if people happened to want to use them.

    It’s not necessary. But it’s an expansion rather than a big change. I would never want to limit people to Facebook comments or anything of that sort.

  11. -I like the “like”.
    -I do not want to get emails about new posts or replies to comments.
    -I do not favor a link to Facebook or any other of the “socials”. I think they are becoming a source of societal harm, and earn billions for a few young Soros resemblers who are smarter than all the rest of us combined.
    -“Neo” in “neo-conservatism” has faded into historical obscurity. Today “neo” is used in “neo-fascism” and “neo-Nazi”. Just a caution!
    -consider “Neviah”. Commenters like you have a prophetic streak in them, rightly so.

  12. 1. font is good.
    2. new Neo
    3. -what happened to this one?-
    4. nesting is nice to follow one idea, but non-nested is easier to read.
    5. as long as there are dates, I’d be OK w/o timestamps
    6. tested it. seems to work OK
    7. fonts? colors? sounds too radical for me.
    8. nice to get notified to help keep track on a conversation. keep it.
    9. FB only to share, otherwise F that dumpster-fire
    10. done!

  13. Sorry to be a spoilsport.
    I like the content; I don’t care if you feed it to me in Tengwar
    or Times New Roman or Cyrillic; I don’t care about the weight, slope, or whether vel non the letters have serifs.
    I just like and enjoy the content.
    If I find the content strains my eyes a bit more than comfortable, I just enlarge it.
    Please just do what’s simplest and most cost-effective for you.

  14. imo it’s a wash–one is a little sharper while the other is a little more colorful.

    🙂

  15. I like the narrow column style in the original better than print across the whole page, because I don’t have to move my eyes or head to read. It just feels more readable and comfortable,
    and I can look up within the paragraphs more easily. I also like the lighter text better, but looks like I’m in the minority!

  16. I hate getting e-mails about new comments or someone responding to my comment. A music site I comment at occasionally does this if you don’t say not to and it is really annoying to check my e-mail and have a bunch from that site. So big no on that one. And no on Facebook only commenting that would be a deal breaker as I can’t stand Facebook.

    On the whole I like the changes.

  17. At newneo, my comments were blocked. In one case, the screen went blank, except for the following message: message blocked due to suspected bot.

    I was using Firefox, along with some common extensions for privacy: Adblocker, Disconnect, HTTPS everywhere, and a VPN (Virtual Private Network). I disconnected all of them, and then cleared cache, cookies, internet temp files, etc. I then again tried to comment. No luck.

    I suspect that the cause of this is not obvious, so — for now anyway — it’s probably best to ignore the issue, but I thought you might like to know.

  18. Cornflour:

    I’ll look into it. It’s obviously (I think!) an overzealous spam filter. I’ll take a look at the settings. When I end up making the transfer, let me know how it’s going. I don’t want you to be blocked, of course. But not only that; if the filter is blocking you, it will be blocking a host of people.

  19. Griffin et.al.:

    No one would ever send you such an email unless you checked the box saying you wanted it. I was just asking whether the checkbox and the line explaining it was intrusive. I can remove the whole thing, I think, if no one would ever use it. But it doesn’t ever get activated unless a person asks to do so.

  20. Neo,

    At the site I was mentioning it is default to send the email and you have to turn it off after every comment so a reverse would be ok.

  21. ” I might add “The New Neo” rather than just “Neo,” which is the way it is now.”

    NO. NO. NO. AND……. (wait for it) …….NOOOOOOOOOO!

  22. JUST USE a different, weightier, san-serif font.

    Maybe “Universe Bold Extended”.

    You’ve got a very small name and that means it needs to be punched up in the space you have for it. (good location)

    You also need to do that one element in a classic chinese red. Not the maroon of the rest.

  23. David, You can increase the font size of the text to suit yourself.

    Just hold down Ctrl key and hit the plus sign in the top line of keys until you get what you need. It should stick for th at site.

  24. Great job!

    Name change seems seamless.

    I like “like” and don’t want to use Facebook to comment under any circumstance, which doesn’t seem to be an issue.

    Although it’s a minority preference to me, nested comments make it easier to follow an sub conversation without getting diverted from the point.

    Narrower copy is more comfortable for me to read. So on my iPad I prefer your current iteration. But on the small screen of my iPhone I prefer the scaling of your new format.

  25. Looks good – you might think about updating the blog list. Stephen Green really doesn’t post at his site anymore, instead he is part of of the posters at Insty and has a strong presence at the PJ Media Hot Mic daily posts.

    Otherwise I think it is very good.

  26. I like having the option to receive replies to comments. Also, isn’t Neo the Keeanu Reeves character in the Matrix? So that might confuse the newcomer as to where your name came from.

  27. Patrick:

    Well, I probably don’t resemble Keanu Reeves a whole lot.

    But I think maybe I’ll add some explanation of my name, perhaps at the end of the “About Me” part.

  28. Another op’nin’, another show…

    Or, if you like it better:
    We are the (folks) of the chorus,
    we hope you like our show,
    We know you’re rootin’ for us,
    but now we have to go.

    Well, we’re rootin’ for you, Neo, anyway.
    Looks like you can’t please all of the people all of the time, but we’ll get used to whatever you do and wonder how we ever did things otherwise.

    I do like the idea of keeping at least a part of your “change” story up front.

  29. Looks good. These 71 year old eyes prefer the larger font. Perhaps an updated photo? One with a cherry instead of an apple.

  30. Like the new site and the name Neo. I THINK I prefer nested comments, but see everyone here does not want them. I often see a comment on your site that I want to respond to, even if there are many newer comments. For example, you answer Patrick in the above thread, right after his comment but have to address him directly by name. What actually happens when I see a comment that is really excellent from my point of view is I want to respond to that comment – either to acknowledge its importance to me or expand on it or both. But if it is an older comment with many intervening comments, I often just give up. Any suggestions (from anyone here) on the best way to deal with this. That is, if I understand this nested vs non-nested issue correctly.

  31. Use “The New Neo” only if you add “and Improved” between “New” and “Neo.”

    Please use all serif fonts.

    The “Like” button works. Email notification opt-in is good. Nested comments are good, too.

    I don’t use Facebook.

    I like the colors. Maroon suits you.

  32. I like it. Clearer for old eyes. The photo is nice.

    I couldn’t see a lot of difference in the videos — maybe the first one is a little brighter?

    I’m not sure about “Neo”. Seems a little abrupt or something. OTOH, I understand not wanting to use Neocon, and I agree. And Neo Neo sounds affected. I guess you have to go with Neo.

  33. I really like the look of the new site. It has a modern fresh look and is easy to read and follow.

    I do prefer nested comments because so many of your comments are in reply to specific ones and sometimes it’s hard to go back and find the correct one.

    ‘Like’ button is good; Facebook is irrelevant to me but I’m sure good for some.

    The font is very readable as are the colors and format. No difference on my computer to the 2 videos. Both have excellent size.

    I’m partial to ‘The New Neo’ because it lets people know you’ve been around for a while and have a history and following.

    I also agree about giving a prominent place to your ‘A Mind is a Difficult Thing to Change’ series of posts. They are what brought me to you in the first place and are a real classic.

  34. “Also, isn’t Neo the Keeanu Reeves character in the Matrix?”

    Our host ought to pose for a photo while wearing a long black trenchcoat and holding a green apple in front of her face.

  35. “Well, I probably don’t resemble Keanu Reeves a whole lot…”
    But you’d look good in a trenchcoat. Go for it! 😉

  36. On the Nested v. unNested threading:
    I follow another site regularly (AccordingToHoyt) which uses nested comments and there are definitely pluses and minuses:

    Plus — for the kind of casual chit-chat that abounds there, the nests allow people to opt-out of that particular side-street, or to contribute to the conversation as desired (this especially applies when someone Mentions Their Gun and the conversation about Models and Ammo goes on for several pages).

    Minus 1 — if someone adds to a conversation after you have read it, you won’t necessarily know (I think that’s what the “notification” may be aimed at, but I couldn’t get it to work for me there, so maybe I’m just blog-illiterate on that level).

    Minus 2 — as someone noted above, if you go way far into nests-within-nests (Ezekial’s syndrome?), the final ones can be loooonnnng lines of one-word-wide text

    Minus 3 — a reply to an upper-level nest comes in AFTER all the nested-nests, and can be ambiguous or incomprehensible unless you follow the lines back up to the top (in which case the tips at * are just as helpful in nested as in un-nested threads).

    Caveat — each AtH post draws upwards of 100, sometimes 200 comments, which Neo does not (yet), so Nesting is necessary to avoid the many-multiple multi-comment side-threads woven into a formidable braid, where it would become very difficult, if not impossible, to follow any coherent line of thought. (Exponentially worse than replying indirectly* to comments at Neo.)

    Conclusion for AtH: pluses for nesting beat not-nesting despite the minuses.

    Counter-minus 1: on the current Neo, once you find your own “final” comment, you know where you left off and can view new comments easily (or you can tell from the timestamps where you quit reading before).
    (Minuses 2 & 3 are effectively countered by the unnested format itself).

    Wish-list: it would be nice in the new blog format to have some kind of “comment added” notification somewhere, somehow (have I just been missing it?) to know when posts are still “active” or not — a few really interesting ones have gone on for a couple of days after Neo puts them up; it doesn’t have to be a sidebar with names and quotes, maybe just a timestamp at the top of the comments with “last comment added dd/dd, tt:tt” — maybe that’s not possible, or maybe no one ever asked.

    *tips on replying — it’s helpful to include the full “citation” of the post you are referencing, that being the name and timestamp (one need not copy the full comment text, but a suggestive quote is helpful in identifying the comment and issue being addressed); if it’s WAY back in line, you can open the comment in a new tab (click on the timestamp), then copy the URL into your reply.

    However, only a few posts have ever been long enough to need something that drastic (it does, however, help a lot if you are replying to a comment in Post A over in Post B because of some kind of topical relevance).

  37. I like just plain “NEO”.

    The first video is a bit sharper.

    To fill the screen on my laptop I needed to zoom 125%.

    I like the nice clean look.

  38. I prefer nested.

    If not, then the ability to note via a “quote” or “reply” is my strong preference.

    If threads are hijacked this way, then moderate them. (My preference is not deletion, but a note that a side-track is moved to a separate comment thread for this purpose. That way the trolls and single-issue fanatics don’t get to bleat about “censorship” but the rest of us can focus on the issue at hand.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>